Milavetz, Gallop & Milavetz, P.A. v. United States, 129 S. Ct. 2766 (2009). · Go Syfert
Milavetz, Gallop & Milavetz, P.A. v. United States, 129 S. Ct. 2766 (2009). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
13 citation events (12 in the last 25 years) across 9 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: East Texas Baptist University v. Sebelius (txsd, 2013-12-27)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" East Texas Baptist University v. Sebelius
S.D. Tex. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See Navajo Nation v. U.S. Forest Serv., 535 F.3d 1058, 1069 (9th Cir.2008) (en banc) (“[T]he cases that RFRA expressly adopted and restored — Sherbert, Yoder , and federal court rulings prior to Smith — also control the ‘substantial burden’ inquiry.”), cert. denied, 556 U.S. 1281 , 129 S.Ct. 2763 , 174 L.Ed.2d 270 (2009); see also Merced v. Kasson, 577 F.3d 578, 587-88 (5th Cir.2009) (beginning the “substantial burden” inquiry under TRFRA, the Texas RFRA analog, with a detailed analysis of Sherbert and Yoder).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Justice v. Rockwell Collins, Inc.
D. Or. · 2015 · signal: see also · confidence low
J. 26 ("Rockwell maintained employment practices and policies that had a disparate impact on non-white, and specifically Indian employees”); see also Navajo Nation v. U.S. Forest Serv., 535 F.3d 1058, 1080 (9th Cir.2008), cert. denied, 556 U.S. 1281 , 129 S.Ct. 2763 , 174 L.Ed.2d 270 (2009) ("[where] the complaint does not include the necessary factual allegations to state a claim, raising such claim in a summary judgment motion is insufficient to present the claim to the district court”). .
cited Cited "see, e.g." Jaeger v. Connecticut Siting Council
Conn. Super. Ct. · 2010 · signal: see also · confidence low
Ed. 2d 624 (1997); see also Navajo Nation v. United States Forest Service, 535 F.3d 1058 , 1067 n.10 (9th Cir. 2008), cert. denied, 556 U.S. 1281 , 129 S. Ct. 2763 , 174 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
MILAVETZ, GALLOP & MILAVETZ, P.A.
v.
UNITED STATES
No. 08-1119.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 8, 2009.
129 S. Ct. 2766
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit granted. The case is consolidated and a total of one hour is allotted for oral argument.