green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
8.8 score
“the importance of the written benefit plan is not inviolable, but is subject - based upon equitable doctrines and principles - to modification and, indeed, even equitable reformation under 11321(a)(3)”
Treatment trajectory · 2012 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2012
2019
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Deborah Kenseth v. Dean Health Plan, Incorporated
the importance of the written benefit plan is not inviolable, but is subject - based upon equitable doctrines and principles - to modification and, indeed, even equitable reformation under 11321(a)(3)
examined
Cited "see"
White v. Ally Financial Inc.
(3×)
See Symczyk v. Genesis Healthcare Corp., 656 F.3d 189 (3d Cir.2011), cert. granted, — U.S. -, 133 S.Ct. 26 , 183 L.Ed.2d 674 (2012) (No. 11-1059).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. James Bennett, Jr.
See Henderson v. United States, 80 U.S.L.W. 3699 , — U.S. -, 133 S.Ct. 27 , 183 L.Ed.2d 674 , 2012 WL 894491 (U.S. June 25, 2012) (No. 11-9307) (granting certiorari to determine whether an error is plain where the case law is unsettled at the time of the district court proceeding but becomes clear during the appeal).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dinkel v. Medstar Health, Inc.
Myers v. Hertz Corp., 624 F.3d 537, 555 (2d Cir.2010) (citations, quotation marks, and emphasis omitted), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 368 , 181 L.Ed.2d 234 (2011); accord Symczyk v. Genesis Healthcare Corp., 656 F.3d 189, 192-93 (3d Cir.2011), cert. granted, on other grounds, No. 11-1059, — U.S. -, 133 S.Ct. 26 , 183 L.Ed.2d 674 , 2012 WL 609478 (June 25, 2012); Comer v. Wal-Mart *53 Stores, Inc., 454 F.3d 544, 546-47 (6th Cir.2006); Morgan v. Family Dollar Stores, Inc., 551 F.3d 1233, 1260-62 (11th Cir.2008), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 59 , 175 L.Ed.2d 23 (2009); McKinney v…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Seymour v. PPG Industries, Inc.
See McCann v. Newman Irrevocable Trust, 458 F.3d 281, 286 (3d Cir.2006); see also Symczyk v. Genesis Healthcare Corp., 656 F.3d 189 , 191 n. 4 (3d Cir.2011) (“ “When subject matter jurisdiction is challenged under Rule 12(b)(1), the plaintiff must bear the burden of persuasion.’ ” (quoting Kehr Packages, Inc. v. Fidelcor, Inc., 926 F.2d 1406 (3d Cir.1991))), cert. granted, — U.S. -, 133 S.Ct. 26 , 183 L.Ed.2d 674 (2012).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Already, LLC, dba Yums
v.
Nike, Inc.
v.
Nike, Inc.
No. 11-982.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 25, 2012.
Published
Citer courts: Seventh Circuit (1)
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari granted.