Sidbury v. United States, 134 S. Ct. 628 (2013). · Go Syfert
Search
Sidbury v. United States, 134 S. Ct. 628 (2013). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“wjhere a defendant raises a colorable and previously unexplored ineffective assistance claim on appeal, we remand for further district court proceedings unless the record alone conclusively shows that the defendant either is or is not entitled to relief.”
6 citation events (6 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Rasheed Kayode (ca5, 2014-12-23)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) United States v. Rasheed Kayode
5th Cir. · 2014 · signal: see also · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
wjhere a defendant raises a colorable and previously unexplored ineffective assistance claim on appeal, we remand for further district court proceedings unless the record alone conclusively shows that the defendant either is or is not entitled to relief.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
James Wesley SIDBURY
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 13–6675..
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 12, 2013.
134 S. Ct. 628
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 63%
Citer courts: Fifth Circuit (1)

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.