Kittka v. Franks, 134 S. Ct. 2661 (2014). · Go Syfert
Search
Kittka v. Franks, 134 S. Ct. 2661 (2014). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
21 citation events (21 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Garner v. People (colo, 2019-03-18)
Treatment trajectory · 2014 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2014 2020 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Garner v. People
Colo. · 2019 · signal: see · confidence high
See Galloway v. State, 122 So.3d 614 , 663 (Miss. 2013) ("The United States Supreme Court has not decided whether Biggers applies to an in-court identification not preceded by an impermissibly suggestive pretrial identification."), cert. denied , 572 U.S. 1134 , 134 S.Ct. 2661 , 189 L.Ed.2d 209 (2014) ; see also Dickson , 141 A.3d at 821 ("The United States Supreme Court has not yet addressed the question of whether first time in-court identifications are in the category of unnecessarily suggestive procedures that trigger due process protections.").
discussed Cited "see" State v. Norton
Md. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See Commonwealth v. Yoke, 621 Pa. 527 , 79 A.3d 520, 537 (2013), cert, denied,-U.S.-, 134 S.Ct. 2662 , 189 L.Ed.2d 209 (2014) ("As explained below, we view the Toxicology Report at issue in this case as similar to the scientific reports in Melendez-Diaz [ 1 and Bullcoming , and, guided by these opinions, hold that it is likewise testimonial.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Norton
Md. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See Commonwealth v. Yohe, 79 A.3d 520, 537 (Pa. 2013), cert. denied, __ U.S. __, 134 S.Ct. 2662 , 189 L.Ed.2d 209 (2014) (“As explained below, we view the Toxicology Report at issue in this case as similar to the scientific reports in Melendez–Diaz [] and Bullcoming, and, guided by these opinions, hold that it is likewise testimonial.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Walker
Conn. · 2019 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Yohe , 621 Pa. 527 , 561, 79 A.3d 520 (2013) (testifying expert's analysis "did not simply parrot another analyst ... rather, he was involved with reviewing all of the raw testing data, evaluating the results, measuring them against lab protocols to determine if the results supported each other, and writing and signing the report" [citation omitted] ), cert. denied, 572 U.S. 1135 , 134 S. Ct. 2662 , 189 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Jeffrey KITTKA
v.
Jackie FRANKS.
No. 13–739..
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 27, 2014.
134 S. Ct. 2661
Published

Case below, 539 Fed.Appx. 668.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.