green
Positive treatment
5.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 2017 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2017
2021
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "but see"
Wiese v. Becerra
But see Kolbe v. Hogan , 849 F.3d 114 , 135-37 (4th Cir. 2017) (en banc), cert. denied , --- U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 469 , 199 L.Ed.2d 374 (2017) (large capacity magazines are not protected by the Second Amendment because they are weapons most useful in military service). 3 b.
discussed
Cited "see"
Hirschfeld v. The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives
See Kolbe v. Hogan, 849 F.3d 114, 132-33 (4th Cir. 2017), cert. denied, 138 S. Ct. 469 (2017) (collecting cases and confirming that “[like most of our sister courts of appeals” the Fourth Circuit applies a two-part analysis); Gould v. Morgan, 907 F.3d 659, 669 (ist Cir. 2018). □ a.
discussed
Cited "see"
Soto v. Bushmaster Firearms International, LLC
See part IV of this dissenting opinion. 24 I also note that the majority observes that certain members of Congress ‘‘were committed to Americans’ second amendment freedoms and sought to secure those freedoms by immunizing firearms companies from frivolous lawsuits.’’ Citing recent federal cases considering the constitutionality of bans on ‘‘assault weapons’’ and ‘‘high capacity magazines,’’ the majority also notes, however, that ‘‘[i]t is not at all clear . . . that the second amendment’s protections even extend to the types of quasi-military, semiautomatic assa…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Maryland Shall Issue, Inc. v. Hogan
Indeed, the Court has made clear that the Second Amendment permits “reasonable firearms regulations.” McDonald v. City of Chicago, 561 U.S. 742, 784 (2010); see Caetano v. Massachusetts, 577 U.S. 411 (2016) (per curiam); see also Kolbe v. Hogan, 849 F.3d 114, 132 (4th Cir. 2017) (en banc), cert. denied, __ U.S. __, 138 S. Ct. 469 (2017); United States v. Chester, 628 F.3d 673, 675 (4th Cir. 2010).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Maryland Shall Issue, Inc. v. Hogan
Indeed, the Court has made clear that the Second Amendment permits “reasonable firearms regulations.” McDonald v. City of Chicago, 561 U.S. 742, 784 (2010); see Caetano v. Massachusetts, 577 U.S. 411 (2016) (per curiam); see also Kolbe v. Hogan, 849 F.3d 114, 132 (4th Cir. 2017) (en banc), cert. denied, __ U.S. __, 138 S. Ct. 469 (2017); United States v. Chester, 628 F.3d 673, 675 (4th Cir. 2010).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mance v. Sessions
See also Kolbe v. Hogan , 849 F.3d 114 , 132 (4th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied , --- U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 469 , 199 L.Ed.2d 374 (2017) ; United States v. Chovan , 735 F.3d 1127 , 1136 (9th Cir. 2013) ; GeorgiaCarry.Org, Inc. v. Georgia , 687 F.3d 1244 , 1261 n.34 (11th Cir. 2012) ; United States v. Decastro , 682 F.3d 160 , 163-64 (2d Cir. 2012) ; United States v. Greeno , 679 F.3d 510 , 518 (6th Cir. 2012) ; Heller v. District of Columbia ( Heller II ), 670 F.3d 1244 , 1252 (D.C.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Cassidy
See, e.g., Kolbe v. Hogan , 849 F.3d 114 , 121 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 469 , 199 L.Ed.2d 374 (2017) ; New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n, Inc. v. Cuomo , 804 F.3d 242 , 247-248 (2d Cir. 2015), cert. denied sub nom.
DESERT WATER AGENCY
v.
AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF CAHUILLA INDIANS
v.
AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF CAHUILLA INDIANS
No. 17–42..
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 27, 2017.
Published
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.