green
Positive treatment
3.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1959 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1959
1992
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Standard Chartered PLC v. Price Waterhouse
Employers Casualty Co. v. Moore, 60 Ariz. 544 , 142 P.2d 414 (1943); United Verde Extension Mining Co. v. Ralston, 37 Ariz. 554 , 296 P. 262 (1931); Deatsch v. Fairfield, 27 Ariz. 387 , 233 P. 887 (1925); accord Shepard v. Cal-Nine Farms, 252 F.2d 884 (9th Cir.1958), cert. denied, 356 U.S. 951 , 78 S.Ct. 916 , 2 L.Ed.2d 844 (1958).
cited
Cited "see"
Clayton Peterson v. Raymond Hager, D/B/A Hager's Flying Service
See Newman v. Brengle, 250 F.2d 660, 661 (7th Cir.1957), cert. denied, 356 U.S. 951 , 78 S.Ct. 916 , 2 L.Ed.2d 844 (1958); Auto Transport v. Potter, 197 F.2d 907 (8th Cir.1952).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bar L Ranch, Inc., and in Intervention-Appellant v. Robert L. Phinney, United States of America, in Intervention-Appellee
See Anderson v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 250 F.2d 242, 248-249 (5 CA1957), cert. denied, 356 U.S. 950 , 78 S.Ct. 915 , 2 L.Ed.2d 844 (1958); Williams v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 45 F.2d 61 (5 CA1930). 300 F.Supp. at 840, n. 1 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Bar L Ranch, Inc. v. Phinney
See Anderson v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 250 F.2d 242, 248-249 (5 CA1957), cert. denied, 356 U.S. 950 , 78 S.Ct. 915 , 2 L.Ed.2d 844 (1958); Williams v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 45 F.2d 61 (5 CA1930).
cited
Cited "see"
Peter J. And Penny v. Marcello v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
See Anderson v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 5 Cir., 1957, 250 F.2d 242 , cert. den., 356 U.S. 950 , 78 S.Ct. 915 , 2 L.Ed.2d 844 . 5 .
cited
Cited "see"
Vincent Marcello, Sadie Marcello v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
See Anderson v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 5 Cir. 1957, 250 F.2d 242 , cert. den., 356 U.S. 950 , 78 S.Ct. 915 , 2 L.Ed.2d 844 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Leon J. Toledano and Esther C. Toledano v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Perry & Co. v. Commissioner, 9th Cir. 1941, 120 F.2d 123 ; see Anderson v. Commissioner, 5th Cir. 1957, 250 F.2d 242 , cert. den., 356 U.S. 950 , 78 S.Ct. 915 , 2 L.Ed.2d 844 (1958); Goldberg v. Commissioner, 5th Cir. 1956, 239 F.2d 316 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Okerlund v. United States
“The valuation process is an ‘inexact science’ requiring reasonable practical, and rational approximation based upon all information before the court.” Kraft, Inc. v. United States, 30 Fed.Cl. 739, 765 (1994) (internal citations omitted); See also Anderson v. CIR, 250 F.2d 242, 249 (5th Cir.1957), cert. denied, 356 U.S. 950 , 78 S.Ct. 915 , 2 L.Ed.2d 844 (1958) (determination of value need not be based on specific expert testimony, provided the determined value is within the range of figures that may be deduced from the evidence).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Sapp
v.
Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co.
v.
Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co.
No. 878.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 5, 1958.
Henry Hammer, Henry H. Edens and James P. Mozingo, III, for petitioners., Norman C. Shepard and Frank G. Kurka for respondent.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.