examined Cited "see, e.g." In re Care & Treatment of Easterberg (3×) Stegall, J., dissenting: "That habeas corpus is not a substitute **507 for an appeal is elementary." State v. Shores , 187 Kan. 492 , 493, 357 P.2d 798 (1960) ; see Germany v. Hudspeth , 174 Kan. 1 , 2, 252 P.2d 858 (1953) ("this court is committed to the rule that a habeas corpus proceeding is not a substitute for appellate review"); see also Medina v. Choate , 875 F.3d 1025 , 1029 (10th Cir. 2017), cert. denied --- U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 1573 , 200 L.Ed.2d 762 (2018) (citing extensive caselaw to conclude that "the prisoner is limited to proceeding by motion to the trial court, followed by a po…