green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
7.7 score
“those incarcerated for a criminal conviction draw on the eighth amendment's ban on 'cruel and unusual punishments.' meanwhile, pretrial detainees and non-incarcerated persons rely on the constitutional guarantee of 'due process.”
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Carzoglio v. Abrams
those incarcerated for a criminal conviction draw on the eighth amendment's ban on 'cruel and unusual punishments.' meanwhile, pretrial detainees and non-incarcerated persons rely on the constitutional guarantee of 'due process.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Miller v. Doe
Courts are ‘‘permitted to exercise their sound discretion in decid- ing which of the two prongs of the qualified immunity analysis should be addressed first in light of the circum- stances in the particular case at hand.’’ Pearson v. Cal- lahan, supra, 236 ; see also Edrei v. Maguire, 892 F.3d 525, 532 (2d Cir. 2018) (plaintiff’s ‘‘[f]ailure to establish either prong’’ entitles defendant to qualified immunity), cert. denied, U.S. , 139 S. Ct. 2614 , 204 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA
v.
Richard VOS
v.
Richard VOS
No. 18–672..
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 20, 2019.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: S.D. New York (1)
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.