green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
7.2 score
“one of (the act's) principal goals was that eventually the postal service would become self-sufficient: be able to operate on the revenue received from postal rates and fees without the assistance of congressional appropriations.”
Treatment trajectory · 1973 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1973
1999
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 23 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
National Association of Greeting Card Publishers v. United States Postal Service, Association of American Publishers, Inc., Recording Industry Association of America, Inc., Council of Public Utility Mailers, Growers & Shippers League of Florida, Associated Third Class Mail Users, American Bankers Association, American Business Press, Inc., Magazine Publishers Association, Inc., Direct Mail/marketing Association, Inc., Reader's Digest Association, Inc., American Council on Education, United Parcel Service of America, American Newspaper Publishers Association, and the National Newspaper Association, Dow Jones & Company, Inc., National Foundation March of Dimes, United Parcel Service of America, Inc., Intervenors. National Association of Greeting Card Publishers v. United States Postal Service, (Two Cases). Time Incorporated v. United States Postal Service, Time Incorporated v. United States Postal Service. Growers and Shippers League of Florida, and Florida Gift Fruit Shippers Association v. United States Postal Service, American Newspaper Publishers Association and National Newspaper Association v. United States Postal Service, American Business Press, Inc. v. United States Postal Service, American Business Press, Inc. v. United States Postal Service. Magazine Publishers Association, Inc. v. United States Postal Service. Magazine Publishers Association, Inc. v. United States Postal Service, State of Maine, State of Indiana, State of Florida, State of Rhode Island, State of Washington, and State of Arkansas v. United States Postal Service, American Business Press, Inc., States of Utah, Iowa and Illinois, Direct Mail/marketing Association, Inc., Magazine Publishers Association, Inc., Readers Digest Association, Inc., Time, Inc. & United Parcel Service of America, Inc., Association of American Publishers, Inc., Mail Order Association of America, Parcel Shippers Association, American Newspaper Publishers Association & National Newspaper Association, Dow Jones & Co., Inc., Intervenors. Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. United States Postal Service, Magazine Publishers Association, Inc., Time Incorporated, United Parcel Service of America, Inc., American Newspaper Publishers Association, National Newspapers Association, State of Connecticut, Direct Mail/marketing Association, Inc., Dow Jones & Co., Inc., Intervenors
one of (the act's) principal goals was that eventually the postal service would become self-sufficient: be able to operate on the revenue received from postal rates and fees without the assistance of congressional appropriations.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
National Association of Greeting Card Publishers v. United States Postal Service
one of principal goals was that eventually the postal service would become self-sufficient: be able to operate on the revenue received from postal rates and fees without the assistance of congressional appropriations.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Sue N. Robinson
See United States v. Bursten, 453 F.2d 605, 607-08 (5th Cir.1971), ce rt. denied, 409 U.S. 843 , 93 S.Ct. 44 , 34 L.Ed.2d 83 (1972).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Clyde E. Wilson, and Stuart Van Eman
See Bursten v. United States, 395 F.2d 976, 981 (5th Cir.1968), ce rt. denied, 409 U.S. 843 , 93 S.Ct. 44 , 34 L.Ed.2d 83 (1972).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Fidencio Saenz, Domitilla Garza, Genoveva Garcia, and Norma Solis, Defendants
See United States v. Bursten, 453 F.2d 605, 608 (5th Cir.1971), ce rt. denied, 409 U.S. 843 , 93 S.Ct. 44 , 34 L.Ed.2d 83 (1972); United States v. Bright, 630 F.2d 804, 824 (5th Cir.1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Smith
The evidence supports the jury's implicit conclusion defendant benefited and had income by receiving *1172 stock, and whether he personally benefited from his use of that stock is not the issue. [43] (64a) Was the Defense of Reliance Established as a Matter of Law? (65a) "It is a valid defense to a charge of filing a false return if a defendant provides full information regarding his taxable income and expenses to an accountant qualified to prepare... tax returns, and that the defendant adopts and files the return as prepared without having reason to believe that it is incorrect." ( United Sta…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Paul D. Ylda
See United States v. Bursten, 453 F.2d 605, 607 (5th Cir. 1971) (dictum), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 843 , 93 S.Ct. 44 , 34 L.Ed.2d 83 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
Williams v. State
Accord, United States v. Bursten, 453 F.2d 605, 610-11 (5th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 843 , 93 S.Ct. 44 , 34 L.Ed.2d 83 (1972); Patriarca v. United States, 402 F.2d 314 , 321 & n.6 (1st Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1022 , 89 S.Ct. 633 , 21 L.Ed.2d 567 (1969). .
cited
Cited "see"
Craton Liddell, a Minor, and Mary Puleo, Gerard Puleo, Emma Dannenberg, Robin Dannenberg, Louis Reineri and Mary Anjela Reineri, Representing the \Involved Citizens Committee\" United States of America v. Board of Education of the City of St. Louis and Daniel L. Schlafly
See Bradley v. Milliken, 468 F.2d 902 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 844 , 93 S.Ct. 45 , 34 L.Ed.2d 83 (1972); Taylor v. Board of Educ., 288 F.2d 600 (2d Cir. 1961).
cited
Cited "see"
Liddell v. Board of Education
See Bradley v. Milliken, 468 F.2d 902 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 844 , 93 S.Ct. 45 , 34 L.Ed.2d 83 (1972); Taylor v. Board of Educ., 288 F.2d 600 (2d Cir. 1961).
cited
Cited "see"
Edwards & Hanly v. Wells Fargo Securities Clearance Corp.
See United States v. DeCarlo, 458 F.2d 358, 364-65 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 843 , 93 S.Ct. 107 , 34 L.Ed.2d 83 (1972); McCormick on Evidence § 295, at 696 (2d ed. 1972). 3 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Miguel Candelaria-Gonzalez and Manuel Ledesma-Ruiz
See Bursten v. United States, 5 Cir. 1968, 395 F.2d 976 , cert. denied 409 U.S. 843 , 93 S.Ct. 44 , 34 L.Ed.2d 83 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Natale
See United States v. DeCarlo, 458 F.2d 358 , 367 n. 12 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 843 , 93 S.Ct. 107 , 34 L.Ed.2d 83 (1972). .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Heller v. Plave
See e.g., Bursten v. United States, 395 F.2d 976, 981-982 (5th Cir.1968), ce rt. denied, 409 U.S. 843 , 93 S.Ct. 44 , 34 L.Ed.2d 83 (1972). 4 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ronald Newsom Hasan Sharif Eddie J. McMillan and Donald Wolverton v. Steve Norris, Commissioner Michael Dutton, Warden and David Hindman
(2×)
The appellees have argued, in this appellate review, that orders to submit remedial plans are not, strictly speaking, injunctive relief, and that as a result this court is without jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (a)(1) to review this part of the district court’s order. 5 “This court has consistently rejected attempts to obtain review of orders requiring the submission of remedial plans.” Groseclose v. Dutton, 788 F.2d 356, 359 (6th Cir.1986) (per curiam) (citations omitted); see also Bradley v. Milliken, 468 F.2d 902 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 844 , 93 S.Ct. 45 , 34 L.Ed.2d …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Richard G. Naas
See also United States v. Wenger, 457 F.2d 1082, 1083-84 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 843 , 93 S.Ct. 44 , 34 L.Ed.2d 83 (1972); Borum v. United States, 409 F.2d 433, 440 (D.C.Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 916 , 89 S.Ct. 1765 , 23 L.Ed.2d 230 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Anthony Giacalone v. United States
Cir.1967), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 916 , 89 S.Ct. 1765 , 23 L.Ed.2d 230 (1969); United States v. Chiarella, 214 F.2d 838, 841 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 348 U.S. 902 , 75 S.Ct. 226 , 99 L.Ed. 708 (1954); see also United States v. Wenger, 457 F.2d 1082, 1083-84 (2d Cir.) cert. denied, 409 U.S. 843 , 93 S.Ct. 44 , 34 L.Ed.2d 83 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jorge Lopez, United States of America v. Alexis Ramos
Compare Bursten v. United States, 395 F.2d 976, 983-84 (5th Cir.1968), appeal after remand, 453 F.2d 605 (5th Cir.1971), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 843 , 93 S.Ct. 44 , 34 L.Ed.2d 83 (1972) (reversing conviction and remanding for new trial where trial court’s repeated interjections were “definitely prejudicial”).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Van Orman v. American Insurance
See also Bradley v. Milliken, 468 F.2d 902 , 902-03 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 844 , 93 S.Ct. 45 , 34 L.Ed.2d 83 (1972); Taylor v. Board of Education, 288 F.2d 600 , 605 (2d Cir. 1961).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Francis Van Orman, on His Own Behalf and on Behalf of a Class of All Participants, Continuing Former Employees, Pensioners, Beneficiaries and Contingent Survivors, as Such Persons Are Defined in the Revised Retirement Plan of the American Insurance Company, American Automobile Insurance Company and Associated Indemnity Corporation (\Tarp\") v. The American Insurance Company
See also Bradley v. Milliken, 468 F.2d 902 , 902-03 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 844 , 93 S.Ct. 45 , 34 L.Ed.2d 83 (1972); Taylor v. Board of Education, 288 F.2d 600 , 605 (2d Cir. 1961).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Frederick L. v. Thomas
See also Bradley v. Milliken, 468 F.2d 902 (6th Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 844 , 93 S.Ct. 45 , 34 L.Ed.2d 83 (1974) 38 Taylor v. Board of Education, 191 F.Supp. 181 (S.D.N.Y.1961) 39 See 288 F.2d at 601 n.1 40 Id. at 602.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Frederick L. v. Thomas
See also Bradley v. Milliken, 468 F.2d 902 (6th Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 844 , 93 S.Ct. 45 , 34 L.Ed.2d 83 (1974). .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Thompson
See also United States v. DeCarlo, 458 F. 2d 358, 370 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U. S. 843 , 93 S.Ct. 112 , 34 L.Ed.2d 83 (1972); Ryan v. United States, 314 F.2d 306, 310 (10th Cir. 1963).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Flynn
v.
Board of Examiners, Board of Education of the City of New York
v.
Board of Examiners, Board of Education of the City of New York
No. 71-1467.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 10, 1972.
Published
Citer courts: Third Circuit (1) · D.C. Circuit (1)
App. Div., Sup. Ct. N. Y., 2d Jud. Dept. Certiorari denied.