green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.6 score
“there is no question that the government's use of a plea bargain in order to induce or encourage a witness' silence cannot be tolerated.”
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Bhagwat v. State
there is no question that the government's use of a plea bargain in order to induce or encourage a witness' silence cannot be tolerated.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Jing Ping Li
In support of his argument that a due process violation has occurred, Li cites Paine v. Baker, 595 F.2d 197 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 925 , 100 S.Ct. 263 , 62 L.Ed.2d 181 (1979), which held “that in certain limited circumstances a claim of constitutional magnitude is raised where a prisoner alleges (1) that information is in his [presentence report], (2) that the information is false, and (3) that it is relied on to a constitutionally significant degree.” Id. at 201.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
James v. Robinson
If the information is relied on to deny parole or statutory good-time credits, the inmate’s conditional liberty interest is at stake and the due process clause is called into play____ Id. at 201-02.
discussed
Cited "see"
Hammond v. United States
See Butler v. United States, 481 A.2d 431, 439 (D.C.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1029 , 105 S.Ct. 1398 , 84 L.Ed.2d 786 (1985). 36 For sufficiency purposes, once the evidence is properly admitted, the evidence must then be sufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that “two or more persons conspired] to commit a criminal offense[ ] and that one of the conspirators committed an overt act pursuant to the conspiracy to effect its purpose.” Jones v. United States, 386 A.2d 308, 314 (D.C.1978) (citing D.C.Code § 22-105a (1981)), 37 cert. denied, 444 U.S. 925 , 100 S.Ct. 263 , 62 L.Ed.2d 1…
discussed
Cited "see"
Johnson v. Rodriguez
See James v. Robinson, 863 F.Supp. 275 (E.D.Va.1994), aff'd, 45 F.3d 426 (4th Cir.1994) Additionally, although not relied upon by Johnson, the Fourth Circuit in Paine v. Baker, 595 F.2d 197 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 925 , 100 S.Ct. 263 , 62 L.Ed.2d 181 (1979), developed a tripartite test to determine when "false information" should be expunged from prison records.
cited
Cited "see"
McCrery v. Mark
See Paine v. Baker, 595 F.2d 197, 201 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 925 , 100 S.Ct. 263 , 62 L.Ed.2d 181 (1979); see also United States ex rel.
cited
Cited "see"
Carl J. Monroe v. Morris Thigpen, Leland Lambert
See Paine v. Baker, 595 F.2d 197 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 925 , 100 S.Ct. 263 , 62 L.Ed.2d 181 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
O'Brien v. United States
See, e.g., Jones v. United States, 386 A.2d 308 (D.C.1978), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 925 , 100 S.Ct. 263 , 62 L.Ed.2d 181 (1979), in which we held that the trial court did not err in excluding psychiatric testimony “offered to negate the specific mental state required for com *301 mission of second-degree murder” because the proffered evidence “would have established ... the defense of diminished responsibility,” a defense which this court has “specifically declined” to recognize.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Freeman v. United States
See also Jones v. United States, 386 A.2d 308 (D.C.1978), cert denied, 444 U.S. 925 , 100 S.Ct. 263 , 62 L.Ed.2d 181 (1979) (attempted armed robbery); Williams v. United States, 283 A.2d 212 (D.C.1971) (attempted destruction of property); Walker v. United States, 248 A.2d 187 (D.C.1968) (attempted procuring); Sellers v. United States, supra (attempted procuring); Commonwealth v. Kennedy, 170 Mass. 18 , 48 N.E. 770 (1897) (attempted murder) (Holmes, J.).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Baugh v. Woodard
Goble v. Bounds, 281 N.C. 307 , 188 S.E. 2d 347 (1972); see also Paine v. Baker, 595 F. 2d 197 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 925 , 62 L.Ed. 2d 181 , 100 S.Ct. 263 (1979).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Paine
v.
Baker
v.
Baker
No. 78-6863.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 29, 1979.
Published
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of Maryland (1)
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.