green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
8.3 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1994 ·
…burden of proof to avoid dismissal of the complaint was not to prove the agency but merely to adduce sufficient evidence to take the issue to the jury.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Cabrera v. Jakabovitz
burden of proof to avoid dismissal of the complaint was not to prove the agency but merely to adduce sufficient evidence to take the issue to the jury.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Cabrera v. Jakabovitz
burden of proof to avoid dismissal of the complaint was not to prove the agency but merely to adduce sufficient evidence to take the issue to the jury.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Spector v. Torenberg
sjeparate wrongs resulting in a single, indivisible injury, as here, create joint and several liability for the whole harm.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Cresswell v. Sullivan & Cromwell
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
Instead, it stated merely that the “settlement stipulation entered into ... was the contract induced by appellees’ misrepresentation.” Id. at 313; see Barrett v. United States, 651 F.Supp. 615 (S.D.N.Y.1986); see also DiSabatino v. U.S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co., 635 F.Supp. 350, 356 (D.Del.1986) (adopting the ‘New York rule’ in applying Maryland law).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Link
See State v. Cason, 596 S.W.2d 436, 440 (Mo.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 982 , 101 S.Ct. 397 , 66 L.Ed.2d 243 (1980); State v. Linzia, 412 S.W.2d 116, 120 (Mo.1967).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Nicholas Uccio
Thus, we have noted that “[t]he doctrine of the law of the case is not an inviolate rule,” United States v. Birney, 686 F.2d 102, 107 (2d Cir.1982); see Slotkin v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York, 614 F.2d 301, 312 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 981 , 101 S.Ct. 395 , 66 L.Ed.2d 243 (1980), and the decision whether or not to apply law-of-the-case is, in turn, informed principally by the concern that disregard of an earlier ruling not be allowed to prejudice the party seeking the benefit of the doctrine, United States v. Birney, 686 F.2d at 107 ; First National Bank of Hollywood v. …
cited
Cited "see"
Interpool, Ltd. v. Certain Freights of the M/V Venture Star (In Re Dunn)
See Slotkin v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York, 614 F.2d 301 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 981 , 101 S.Ct. 395 , 66 L.Ed.2d 243 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Cynthia Grantham Wright v. Peter J. Cayan, Individually and as President of the State University of New York College of Technology
(2×)
See Slotkin v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York, 614 F.2d 301, 312 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 981 , 101 S.Ct. 395 , 66 L.Ed.2d 243 (1980); Dictograph Products Co. v. Sonotone Corp., 230 F.2d 131, 134-36 , reh'g denied, 231 F.2d 867 (2d Cir.) (per curiam), petition for cert. dismissed per stipulation, 352 U.S. 883 , 77 S.Ct. 104 , 1 L.Ed.2d 82 (1956).
cited
Cited "see"
DiSabatino v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
See Slotkin v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York, 614 F.2d 301, 312 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 981 , 101 S.Ct. 395 , 66 L.Ed.2d 243 (1980)(“New York rule” serves to deter fraud); C.
discussed
Cited "see"
Charles Fisher v. First Stamford Bank and Trust Company
(2×)
See Slotkin v. Citizens Casualty Co., 614 F.2d 301, 317 (2d Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 981 , 101 S.Ct. 395 , 66 L.Ed.2d 243 (1980); E.
cited
Cited "see"
Beeck v. Aquaslide 'N' Dive Corp.
See id. at 94 (citing Slotkin v. Citizens Casualty Co., 614 F.2d 301 (2nd Cir.1979), ce rt. denied, 449 U.S. 981 , 101 S.Ct. 395 , 66 L.Ed.2d 243 (1980)).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Strubberg
(2×)
See State v. Cason, 596 S.W.2d 436, 438-39 (Mo.1980), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 101 S.Ct. 397 , 66 L.Ed.2d 243 (1980). [3] See Garrett v. State, 486 S.W.2d 272, 273-74 (Mo.1972). [4] The present version of the § 552.020.9, RSMo Supp.1975, appears in § 552.020.11, RSMo Cum.Supp.1980. [5] For the history of the "partial responsibility" or "diminished capacity" doctrine in Missouri, see note 2, supra. [6] In stating that "application of the partial responsibility doctrine presupposes guilt of some crime," we do not mean that the defendant in any sense admits guilt by injecting the issue of pa…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gilmore v. Shearson/American Express Inc.
See also Slotkin v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York, 614 F.2d 301, 312 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 981 , 101 S.Ct. 395 , 396, 66 L.Ed.2d 243 (1980); Corporacion de Mercadeo Agricola v. Mellon Bank International, 608 F.2d 43, 48 (2d Cir.1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re United States of America, in Re \Agent Orange\" Product Liability Litigation"
See, e.g., Slotkin v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York, 614 F.2d 301, 312 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 981 , 101 S.Ct. 395 , 66 L.Ed.2d 243 (1980); Dictograph Products Co. v. Sonotone Corp., 230 F.2d 131, 134-36 (2d Cir.), petition for cert. dismissed per stipulation, 352 U.S. 883 , 77 S.Ct. 104 , 1 L.Ed.2d 82 (1956).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Jenkins
v.
Brewer
v.
Brewer
No. 80-5116.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 10, 1980.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Second Circuit (4) · S.D. New York (2)
C. A. 7th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and certiorari granted.