green
Positive treatment
2.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Avondale Industries, Inc. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor and Wilton J. Cuevas
See also Fulks v. Avondale Shipyards, Inc., 637 F.2d 1008, 1012 (5th Cir.) (applying Cardillo’s last employer rule), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1080 , 102 S.Ct. 633 , 70 L.Ed.2d 613 (1981); Argonaut Insurance Company v. Patterson, 846 F.2d 715, 719 (11th Cir.1988) (stating that prior to the split of the 5th and 11th Circuits, the Circuit adopted the last employer rule in Fulks).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Avondale Industries, Inc. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs
See also Fulks v. Avondale Shipyards, Inc., 637 F.2d 1008, 1012 (5th Cir.) (applying Cardillo 's last employer rule), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1080 , 102 S.Ct. 633 , 70 L.Ed.2d 613 (1981); Argonaut Insurance Company v. Patterson, 846 F.2d 715, 719 (11th Cir.1988) (stating that prior to the split of the 5t h and 11th Circuits, the Circuit adopted the last employer rule in Fulks ).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Argonaut Insurance v. Patterson
See, e.g., Fulks v. Avondale Shipyards, Inc., 637 F.2d 1008 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1080 , 102 S.Ct. 633 , 70 L.Ed.2d 613 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Argonaut Insurance Company v. Patterson
See, e.g., Fulks v. Avondale Shipyards, Inc., 637 F.2d 1008 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1080 , 102 S.Ct. 633 , 70 L.Ed.2d 613 (1981). 20 Much of the controversy in this case revolves around selecting the date at which Patterson became "aware" that he was "suffering from an occupational disease arising naturally out of his employment...." Cardillo, 225 F.2d at 145 . 21 B.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
American Mutual Liability Insurance v. Smith
In a case of this nature "we are to review only for errors of law, and [we must] make certain that the Board adhered to its statutory standard of review of factual determinations." Presley v. Tinsley Maintenance Service, 529 F.2d 433, 436 (5th Cir.1976); see also Fulks v. Avondale Shipyards, Inc., 637 F.2d 1008, 1011 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1080 , 102 S.Ct. 633 , 70 L.Ed.2d 613 (1981). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
American Mutual Liability Insurance Company v. Suzanne Smith (Child of James v. Smith), and Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, U.S. Department of Labor, American Mutual Liability Insurance Company v. Christopher Lamon and Patrick Wayne Andrews (Children of Cecil Andrews), and Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, U.S. Department of Labor, American Mutual Liability Insurance Company v. Brenda Turnbo (Child of Benny Turnbo, Jr.), and Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, U.S. Department of Labor
The ALJs in the Smith and Andrews cases agreed that an immediate increase was due and ordered the compensation rate increased to 50% 3 In a case of this nature "we are to review only for errors of law, and [we must] make certain that the Board adhered to its statutory standard of review of factual determinations." Presley v. Tinsley Maintenance Service, 529 F.2d 433, 436 (5th Cir.1976); see also Fulks v. Avondale Shipyards, Inc., 637 F.2d 1008, 1011 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1080 , 102 S.Ct. 633 , 70 L.Ed.2d 613 (1981) 4 The New York statute, as reprinted in Carlin, provided: If t…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Todd Shipyards Corp. v. Black
See also Fulks v. Avondale Shipyards, Inc., 637 F.2d 1008, 1012 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1080 , 102 S.Ct. 633 , 70 L.Ed.2d 613 (1981) (a disease arising from occupational exposure is compensable under the Act) 4 The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, in an unpublished memorandum, subsequently vacated and remanded the BRB's decision in Green.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Todd Shipyards Corp. v. Black
See also Fulks v. Avondale Shipyards, Inc., 637 F.2d 1008, 1012 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1080 , 102 S.Ct. 633 , 70 L.Ed.2d 613 (1981) (a disease arising from occupational exposure is compensable under the Act). .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Fulks
v.
Avondale Shipyards, Inc. and Avondale Shipyards, Inc. v. Fulks
v.
Avondale Shipyards, Inc. and Avondale Shipyards, Inc. v. Fulks
No. 80-1923; No. 80-2135.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 30, 1981.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 637 F. 2d 1008.