green
Positive treatment
6.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
General Motors Corp. v. Kilgore
See Pennsylvania Public Utility Com. v. Consolidated Rail Corp., 461 U.S. 912 , 103 S.Ct. 1888 , 77 L.Ed.2d 280 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Silvestre Chavez v. Department of Health and Human Services
(2×)
See Santise v. Schweiker, 676 F.2d 925, 927-28 (3d Cir.1982), cert, dismissed, 461 U.S. 911 , 103 S.Ct. 1889 , 77 L.Ed.2d 280 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Grand Jury Subpoena Dated April 9, 1996 v. Smith
(2×)
See United States v. Meeks, 642 F.2d 733, 735 (5th Cir. Unit A April 1981) (“Hankins never made clear that his claim of privilege was directed solely against explaining what role he might have played in the fact that records were no longer available rather than a general claim that the records within themselves might incriminate him.”), vacated, 461 U.S. 912 , 103 S.Ct. 1889 , 77 L.Ed.2d 280 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
No. 96-4676 Non-Argument Calendar
(2×)
See United States v. Meeks, 642 F.2d 733, 735 (5th Cir. Unit A April 1981) ("Hankins never made clear that his claim of privilege was directed solely against explaining what role he might have played in the fact that records were no longer available rather than a general claim that the records within themselves might incriminate him."), vacated, 461 U.S. 912 , 103 S.Ct. 1889 , 77 L.Ed.2d 280 (1983). 25 Thus, for the Court to treat appellant's statement as a waiver would create an intolerable result, placing appellant in the position of remaining silent and being held in contempt for failing to…
discussed
Cited "see"
Grand Jury Proceedings, In Re:
(2×)
See United States v. Meeks, 642 F.2d 733, 735 (5th Cir. Unit A, April 1981) ("Hankins never made clear that his claim of privilege was directed solely against explaining what role he might have played in the fact that records were no longer available rather than a general claim that the records within themselves might incriminate him."), vacated, 461 U.S. 912 , 103 S.Ct. 1889 , 77 L.Ed.2d 280 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Nash v. Bowen
(2×)
See Santise v. Schweiker, 676 F.2d 925, 930-31 (3d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 911 , 103 S.Ct. 1889 , 77 L.Ed.2d 280 (1983); see generally Scalia, The ALJ Fiasco — A Reprise, 47 U.Chi.L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Nash v. Bowen
(2×)
See Santise v. Schweiker, 676 F.2d 925, 930-31 (3d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 911 , 103 S.Ct. 1889 , 77 L.Ed.2d 280 (1983); see generally Scalia, The ALJ Fiasco--A Reprise, 47 U.Chi.L.Rev. 57 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Santini v. Consolidated Rail Corp.
See Consolidated Rail Corporation v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (E.D.Pa., 1982), 536 F.Supp. 653 , aff'd (3rd Cir.1982) 696 F.2d 981 , aff'd (1983), 461 U.S. 912 , 103 S.Ct. 1888 , 77 L.Ed.2d 280 (assuming proper test for preemption of Pennsylvania statute requiring locomotives to have speed recorders and indicators was contained in Federal Railroad Safety Act of 1970, 45 U.S.C. § 434 , state statute was preempted because federal regulation covered same subject matter); National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners v. Coleman (3rd Cir.1976) 542 F.2d 11 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Mary Marshall, Individually and as Personal Representative v. Burlington Northern, Inc.
Accord Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Pennsylvania Public Utilities Comm’n, 536 F.Supp. 653 (E.D.Pa.1982), aff’d mem., 696 F.2d 981 (3d Cir.1982), aff’d sum. sub nom., Pennsylvania Public Utilities Comm’n v. Consolidated Rail Corp., — U.S. —, 103 S.Ct. 1888 , 77 L.Ed.2d 280 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Richards v. NEW YORK STATE DEPT. OF CORR. SERVICES
See, e.g., Common Cause v. Bolger, 512 F.Supp. 26, 30 (D.D.C.1980), aff'd, ___ U.S. ___, 103 S.Ct. 1888 , 77 L.Ed.2d 280 (1983); Rhode Island Chapter, Associated General Contractors of America, Inc. v. Kreps, 450 F.Supp. 338 , 346-47 n. 3 (D.R.I. 1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Richards v. New York State Department of Correctional Services
See, e.g., Common Cause v. Bolger, 512 F.Supp. 26, 30 (D.D.C.1980), aff’d, _ U.S. _, 103 S.Ct. 1888 , 77 L.Ed.2d 280 (1983); Rhode Island Chapter, Associated General Contractors of America, Inc. v. Kreps, 450 F.Supp. 338 , 346-47 n. 3 (D.R.I.1978).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Simmons
v.
Heckler, Secretary of Health and Human Services
v.
Heckler, Secretary of Health and Human Services
No. 82-5276.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 27, 1983.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari dismissed under this Court’s Rule 53.