Morejon v. United States, 469 U.S. 1196 (1985). · Go Syfert
Search
Morejon v. United States, 469 U.S. 1196 (1985). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
113 citation events (15 in the last 25 years) across 30 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Paley v. Estate of Ogus (dcd, 1998-09-30)
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986 2006 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 17 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Paley v. Estate of Ogus
D.D.C. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See Jack Faucett Assocs., Inc. v. AT & T, 744 F.2d 118, 132 (D.C.Cir.1984) ("Generally speaking, when a particular fact is established not by judicial resolution but by stipulation of the parties, that fact has not been ‘actually litigated’ and thus is not a proper candidate for issue preclusion.”) (quoting Otherson, 711 F.2d at 274 ), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1196 , 105 S.Ct. 980 , 83 L.Ed.2d 982 (1985); Southern Pacific Communications Co. v. AT & T, 740 F.2d 1011, 1020-21 (D.C.Cir.1984) (stating that although some courts have given issue preclusion effects to consent judgments, such acti…
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Fred Frey and Robert Demas, Fred Frey, in No. 94-1594. Robert Demas, in No. 94-1605
3rd Cir. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
This court has held, “To sup *798 port a mad fraud conviction, a mailing must further the scheme to defraud or be incident to an essential part of that scheme.” Ruuska, 883 F.2d at 264 ; see United States v. Otto, 742 F.2d 104, 108 (3d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1196 , 105 S.Ct. 978 , 83 L.Ed.2d 980 (1985).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Frey
3rd Cir. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
This court has held, "To support a mail fraud conviction, a mailing must further the scheme to defraud or be incident to an essential part of that scheme." Ruuska, 883 F.2d at 264; see United States v. Otto, 742 F.2d 104, 108 (3d Cir. 1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1196 (1985).
discussed Cited "see" Delbert James Gunnett v. Robert G. Redman, Warden
6th Cir. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Polselli, 747 F.2d 356, 358 (6th Cir.1984) (per curiam), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1196 (1985). 7 Second, the comments made by the trial judge at the plea proceedings, when read in the context of the totality of the circumstances, do not support Gunnett's claim that the comments constituted a threat.
cited Cited "see" Algie v. RCA Global Communications, Inc.
S.D.N.Y. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally Jack Faucett Assocs. v. AT & T Co., 744 F.2d 118, 124-25 (D.C.Cir. 1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1196 , 105 S.Ct. 980 , 83 L.Ed.2d 982 (1985).
cited Cited "see" Larry Noal White v. United States
6th Cir. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Polselli, 747 F.2d 356, 357 (6th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1196 (1985).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Waldrop
M.D. Penn. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Otto, 742 F.2d 104 (3rd Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1196 , 105 S.Ct. 978 , 83 L.Ed.2d 980 .
cited Cited "see" United States v. Jerry Alfred Whitworth
9th Cir. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
Agosto, 502 F.2d at 614 ; see United States v. Salvador, 740 F.2d 752, 757 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1196 , 105 S.Ct. 978 , 83 L.Ed.2d 980 (1985).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Marte v. Berkman
N.Y. App. Div. · 2010 · signal: see also · confidence low
The memorandum states that “the court failed to confirm that the jury was hopelessly deadlocked either by polling the jurors or by asking the foreperson in the presence of the jury whether a unanimous verdict could be reached in a reasonable amount of time.” But this hindsight criticism of the court—neither defendant asked either for the jury to be so polled or the foreperson to be so questioned—disregards what is most important: the jury reported in its last note, as it had indicated in an earlier note that it was at an impasse on two of the four counts (see United States v Byrski, 85…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." New Mexico v. General Electric Co.
D.N.M. · 2004 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., People of the State of Illinois v. City of Milwaukee, 731 F.2d 403, 415 (7th Cir.1984) (state cannot recover damages for public nuisance because it had not suffered injury resulting from dumping of raw sewage into public waters of Lake Michigan of a kind different from that suffered by the public), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1196 , 105 S.Ct. 979 , 83 L.Ed.2d 981 (1985). 3.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. Fag Bearings Corporation
8th Cir. · 2003 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Jack Faucett Assocs. v. AT & T Co., 744 F.2d 118, 128-29 (D.C.Cir.1984) (refusing to apply collateral estoppel where evidence tending to require a different result was excluded in the first action by erroneous evidentiary rulings by the court), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1196 , 105 S.Ct. 980 , 88 L.Ed.2d 982 (1985); Rye v. United States Steel Mining Co., 856 F.Supp. 274, 278-79 (E.D.Va.1994) (refusing to apply collateral estoppel where key witness disappeared before first trial and court made other erroneous evidentiary rulings); Mocci v. Carr Eng’g Assocs., 306 N.J.Super. 302 , 703 A…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Robert C. Bentz Ronald T. Ross, Ronald T. Ross
3rd Cir. · 1994 · signal: see also · confidence low
In Pereira v. United States, 347 U.S. 1 , 74 S.Ct. 358 , 98 L.Ed. 435 (1954), the Supreme Court defined the “use of the mails” requirement for mail fraud, stating that: ‘Where one does an act with knowledge that the use of the mails will follow in the ordinary course of business, or where such use can reasonably be foreseen, even though not actually intended, then he ‘causes’ the mails to be used.” Id. at 8-9 , 74 S.Ct. at 363 (citing United States v. Kenofskey, 243 U.S. 440 , 37 S.Ct. 438 , 61 L.Ed. 836 (1917)); see also United States v. Otto, 742 F.2d 104, 109 (3d Cir.1984) (reit…
cited Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Richard Terry Ruuska Appeal of Richard T. Ruuska
3rd Cir. · 1989 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Otto, 742 F.2d 104 (3d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1196 , 105 S.Ct. 978 , 83 L.Ed.2d 980 (1985).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." In Re Air Crash Disaster at Stapleton International Airport (2×)
D. Colo. · 1989 · signal: see also · confidence low
Trial courts are afforded broad discretion to apply its principles in the interests of “justice and equity.” Blonder-Tongue Labs, Inc. v. University of Illinois Foundation, 402 U.S. 313, 333-34 , 91 S.Ct. 1434, 1445 , 28 L.Ed.2d 788 (1971); see also Jack Faucett Associates v. American Telephone & Telegraph, 744 F.2d 118, 125 (D.C.Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1196 , 105 S.Ct. 980 , 83 L.Ed.2d 982 (1985).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Clark-Cowlitz Joint Operating Agency v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
D.C. Cir. · 1987 · signal: see also · confidence low
See, e.g., Gould v. Mossinghoff, 711 F.2d 396, 398-99 (D.C.Cir. 1983); see also Jack Faucett Associates, Inc. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co., 744 F.2d 118, 124 (D.C.Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1196 , 105 S.Ct. 980 , 83 L.Ed.2d 982 (1985).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Clark-Cowlitz Joint Operating Agency v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
D.C. Cir. · 1987 · signal: see also · confidence low
See, e.g., Gould v. Mossinghoff, 711 F.2d 396, 398-99 (D.C.Cir.1983); see also Jack Faucett Associates, Inc. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co., 744 F.2d 118, 124 (D.C.Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1196 , 105 S.Ct. 980 , 83 L.Ed.2d 982 (1985).
cited Cited "see, e.g." United States v. William Willis
6th Cir. · 1986 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Polselli, 747 F.2d 356, 357 (6th Cir.1984) (per curiam), cert denied, 469 U.S. 1196 , 105 S.Ct. 979 , 83 L.Ed.2d 981 (1985).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Morejon
v.
United States
No. 84-5916.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 21, 1985.
469 U.S. 1196
Published

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.