green
Positive treatment
3.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
State v. Arnold
(2×)
But see, Quaring v. Peterson, 728 F.2d 1121 (8th Cir.1984), aff'd, 472 U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 3492 , 86 L.Ed.2d 383 (1985); and Bureau of Motor Vehicles v. Pentecostal House, 269 Ind. 361 , 380 N.E.2d 1225 (1978), which found *324 photograph requirements for driver’s licenses to be an unconstitutional burden.
discussed
Cited "see"
Department of Social Services v. Emmanuel Baptist Preschool
(2×)
See Pepper, Taking the Free Exercise Clause seriously, 1986 BYU L R 299, 316-323, ns 70-101, 334-335, citing Jensen v Quaring, 472 US 478 ; 105 S Ct 3492 ; 86 L Ed 2d 383 (1985), Sherbert v Verner, Yoder, and Bowen, supra . [59] I express no opinion whatsoever on the question whether the state's legitimate interests extend to the regulation of curriculum and of the educational qualifications of staff at private preschools.
discussed
Cited "see"
Opinion No. Oag 23-86, (1986)
See Quaring v. Peterson , 728 F.2d 1121 (8th Cir. 1984), aff'd by equally divided court without opinion , 105 S.Ct. 3492 (1985) (holding that states must recognize a religious objection to photo requirement); 1 Bureau of Motor Vehicles v. Pentecostal House , 269 Ind. 361 , 380 N.E.2d 1225 (1978) (state must recognize religious objection); Johnson v. Motor Vehicle Division, Etc ., 593 P.2d 1363 (Colo. 1979) (state need not recognize religious objection); Dennis v. Charnes , 571 F. Supp. 462 (D.
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Olsen v. Mukasey
(3×)
See, e.g., Quaring v. Peterson, 728 F.2d 1121, 1126-27 (8th Cir.1984) (applying Sherbert and Yoder by evaluating whether a government interest in requiring driver’s license photographs is compelling as applied to a particular free-exercise claimant), aff'd by an equally divided court, 472 U.S. 478 , 105 S.Ct. 3492 , 86 L.Ed.2d 383 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Carl Olsen v. Michael Mukasey
See, e.g., Quaring v. Peterson, 728 F.2d 1121, 1126-27 (8th Cir. 1984) (applying Sherbert and Yoder by evaluating whether a government interest in requiring driver’s license photographs is compelling as applied to a particular free-exercise claimant), aff’d by an equally divided court, 472 U.S. 478 (1985).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
JENSEN, DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES OF NEBRASKA, ET AL.
v.
QUARING
v.
QUARING
83-1944.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 17, 1985.
Per Curiam.
Cited by 20 opinions | Published
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHT CIRCUIT
Ruth Anne E. Galter, Assistant Attorney General of Nebraska, argued the cause for petitioners. With her on the brief was Paul L. Douglas, Attorney General.
Thomas C. Lansworth argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Burt Neuborne and Charles S. Sims.[*]
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.
JUSTICE POWELL took no part in the decision of this case.
[*] Marc D. Stern and Ronald A. Krauss filed a brief for the American Jewish Congress et al. as amici curiae urging affirmance.
Solicitor General Lee, Deputy Solicitor General Geller, and Kathryn A. Oberly filed a brief for the United States as amicus curiae.