green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
8.1 score
“n marital homicide cases, a statement showing ill-feelings, threats or similar conduct by one spouse towards the other is relevant to show motive or malice”
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 19 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Cheney v. State
n marital homicide cases, a statement showing ill-feelings, threats or similar conduct by one spouse towards the other is relevant to show motive or malice
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Eural WILLS, II, Defendant-Appellant
See United States v. Fioravanti, 412 F.2d 407, 416 (3d Cir.1969) (barring the use of an Allen instruction at any stage of the proceedings), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 837 , 90 S.Ct. 97 , 24 L.Ed.2d 88 (1969); cf. United States v. Graham, 758 F.2d 879, 883 (3d Cir.) (use of Allen instruction not plain error), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 901 , 106 S.Ct. 226 , 227, 88 L.Ed.2d 226, 227 (1985).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Antonio Luis Burgos
Circuit are required to use charge patterned on American Bar Association standard rather than the “problematic” Allen charge), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 924 , 109 S.Ct. 3257 , 106 L.Ed.2d 603 (1989); United States v. Graham, 758 F.2d 879, 883 (3d Cir.) (restating circuit’s previous rejection of Allen charge), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 901 , 106 S.Ct. 226 , 227, 88 L.Ed.2d 226, 227 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bissell
Counsel for Barbara BisseU’s passing comment regarding her belief Proposed Jury Instruction No. 100 should not be given does not meet her requirement to state “distinctly the matter objected to and the grounds of the objection.” Fed.R.Crim.P. 30 11 ; see United States v. Rosero, 42 F.3d 166, 173 (3d Cir.1994) (“Without a clearly articulated objection, a trial judge is not appraised sufficiently of the contested issue and the need to cure a potential issue____”) (citing United States v. Castro, 776 F.2d 1118, 1128-29 (3d Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1029 , 106 S.Ct. 1233 , 89 L.E…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Giampa
In the Third Circuit, the giving of an Allen charge is "normally reversible error.” Id.; accord United States v. Graham, 758 F.2d 879, 883 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 901 , 106 S.Ct. 226 , 88 L.Ed.2d 226 (1985). 132 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. John Doe, James Roe
See United States v. Yater, 756 F.2d 1058, 1062 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 901 , 106 S.Ct. 225 , 88 L.Ed.2d 226 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bertoli
In the Third Circuit, the giving of an Allen charge is “normally reversible error.” Id.; accord United States v. Graham, 758 F.2d 879, 883 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 901 , 106 S.Ct. 226 , 88 L.Ed.2d 226 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Victor Arditti, United States of America v. Guillermo Avila
(2×)
Congress subsequently amended the statute, but altered only one of the provisions relevant here, § 1956(c)(5) (clarifying, not enacting substantive changes to, definition of "monetary instruments") 4 See also Fifth Circuit Pattern Jury Instructions § 2.21, at 91 (West 1990) (proposed conspiracy instruction "adequately addresses the requirement of a specific intent to violate the law" if no "special state of mind," e.g., premeditation, required by substantive offense); id. § 1.36 at 52 ("we have attempted to define clearly what state of mind is required, i.e., what the defendant must know an…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Darryl Wayne Campbell
See United States v. Yater, 756 F.2d 1058, 1066 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 901 , 106 S.Ct. 225 , 88 L.Ed.2d 226 (1985) (due process violation found only in rarest and most outrageous circumstances).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Douglas Floyd Osborne, Jr.
See United States v. Yater, 756 F.2d 1058, 1062 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 901 , 106 S.Ct. 225 , 88 L.Ed.2d 226 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Kelsey v. State
See Villanueva v. State, 695 P.2d 858, 860 (Okla.Crim.App.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 701 , 106 S.Ct. 226 , 88 L.Ed.2d 226 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gerardo Antonio Gomez, A/K/A Jerry Gomez, United States of America v. Mickey Crocker, United States of America v. Kelly Lynn Hanlon, A/K/A Leslie Ann Warren
See United States v. Yater, 756 F.2d 1058, 1067 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 106 S.Ct. 225 , 88 L.Ed.2d 226 (1985); United States v. Edwards, 549 F.2d 362, 365 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 828 , 98 S.Ct. 107 , 54 L.Ed.2d 87 (1977); United States v. Garcia, 528 F.2d 580, 586 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 898 , 97 S.Ct. 262 , 50 L.Ed.2d 182 (1976); United States v. Dickens, 524 F.2d 441, 446-47 (5th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 994 , 96 S.Ct. 2208 , 48 L.Ed.2d 819 (1976); United States v. Jenkins, 480 F.2d 1198, 1199-1200 (5th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 414 U.S…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gomez
See United States v. Yater, 756 F.2d 1058, 1067 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 225 , 88 L.Ed.2d 226 (1985); United States v. Edwards, 549 F.2d 362, 365 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 828 , 98 S.Ct. 107 , 54 L.Ed.2d 87 (1977); United States v. Garcia, 528 F.2d 580, 586 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 898 , 97 S.Ct. 262 , 50 L.Ed.2d 182 (1976); United States v. Dickens, 524 F.2d 441, 446-47 (5th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 994 , 96 S.Ct. 2208 , 48 L.Ed.2d 819 (1976); United States v. Jenkins, 480 F.2d 1198, 1199-1200 (5th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 9…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Hardy
See also, U.S. v. Yater, 756 F.2d 1058 , 1065 n. 11 (5th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 901 , 106 S.Ct. 225 , 88 L.Ed.2d 226 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Reese v. State
See, United States v. Garcia, 528 F.2d 580, 586 (5th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 898 , 97 S.Ct. 262 , 50 L.Ed.2d 182 (1976) (concluding that Williamson condemned the use of a contingent fee where it involves the promised payment of a specified sum to convict a specified suspect); United States v. Onori, 535 F.2d 938, 942 (5th Cir.1976) (condemning where a specific sum is for successfully incriminating the indicated defendant); See, also, United States v. Yater, 756 F.2d 1058, 1067 (5th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 901 , 106 S.Ct. 225 , 88 L.Ed.2d 226 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Adair v. State
(2×)
See also United States v. Graham , 758 F.2d 879 , 882 (3d Cir.) (wherein the trial court instructed a deadlocked jury, which had previously requested to be dismissed early on Friday afternoon for the Jewish holiday of Yom Kippur, that "[t]here are no time deadlines within which you must reach your verdict"), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 901 , 106 S.Ct. 226 , 227 , 88 L.Ed.2d 226 , 227 (1985); United States v. Bottom , 638 F.2d 781 , 788 (5th Cir. 1981) (wherein the court recognized that an important factor in determining that the Allen charge was not coercive was that "no deadline was set for the ju…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Caldwell
See also, U.S. v. Yater, 756 F.2d 1058 , 1065 n. 11 (5th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 901 , 106 S.Ct. 225 , 88 L.Ed.2d 226 (1985); and U.S. v. Nixon, 777 F.2d 958 (5th Cir.1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Samuel G. Ramos
(2×)
Compare United States v. Yater, 756 F.2d 1058, 1059 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 901 , 106 S.Ct. 225 , 88 L.Ed.2d 226 (1985) (in a case where the defendant entered a conditional plea of guilty to a charge of conspiracy to distribute cocaine, the defendant waived his right to appeal the entrapment issue by his conditional guilty plea); United States v. Sarmiento, 786 F.2d 665, 668 (5th Cir.1986) (Entrapment is a defense on the merits that is waived by a conditional guilty plea).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. M.K. Fadel
See, e.g., United States v. Yater, 756 F.2d 1058, 1062-63 (5th Cir.) cert. denied, 474 U.S. 901 , 106 S.Ct. 225 , 88 L.Ed. 2d 226 (1985); United States v. Swiatek, 632 F.Supp. 985, 993 (N.D.Ill.1986); United States v. Killough, 607 F.Supp. 1009, 1011 (E.D.Ark.1985); United States v. Persico, 520 F.Supp. 96, 98 (E.D.N.Y.1981); United States v. Myers, 527 F.Supp. 1206 (E.D.N.Y.1981); United States v. DePalma, 461 F.Supp. 778, 794 (S.D.N.Y.1978).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kramsvogel
v.
Wisconsin
v.
Wisconsin
No. 84-6921.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 15, 1985.
Cited by 62 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Court of Criminal Appeals of O… (1)
Sup. Ct. Wis. Certiorari denied.