green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
12.4 score
“the decision to disregard all material submitted after a reasonable filing deadline is certainly not an abuse of discretion ...”
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 49 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Franklyn G. Perry
But cf. In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Served Upon Doe, 781 F.2d 238 (2nd Cir 1985) (en banc), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1108 , 106 S.Ct. 1515 , 89 L.Ed.2d 914 (1986) (rejecting requirement to show in both pre- and post-indictment contexts).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Davis International, LLC v. New Start Group Corp.
the decision to disregard all material submitted after a reasonable filing deadline is certainly not an abuse of discretion ...
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Davis International, LLC v. New Start Group Corp.
the decision to disregard all material submitted after a reasonable filing deadline is certainly not an abuse of discretion ...
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Tukesbrey v. Midwest Transit, Inc.
affidavits are admissible in summary judgment proceedings if they are made under penalties of perjury ...
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Ann McLaughlin Secretary of Labor, U.S. Department of Labor, Plaintiff v. Joe H. Liu, Individually and Doing Business as J L Fashions, Defendants
To this he is clearly entitled under Anderson (“The evidence of the non-mov-ant is to be believed,” 477 U.S. at 255 , 106 S.Ct. at 1513) and a host of other decisions. 7 Summary judgment cannot be justified in the face of such evidence.
discussed
Cited "see"
Young v. Choinski
See Franco v. Kelly, 854 F.2d 584, 587 (2d Cir.1988) (accepting sworn complaint as evidence of factual dispute for summary judgment and citing Pfeil v. Rogers, 757 F.2d 850 , 859 & n. 15 (7th Cir.1985) (“noting that documents sworn under penalty of perjury may suffice for summary judgment purposes even if they do not meet all of the formal requirements of a notarized affidavit”), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1107 , 106 S.Ct. 1513 , 89 L.Ed.2d 912 (1986)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Almighty Supreme Born Allah v. Milling
See Franco v. Kelly, 854 F.2d 584, 587 (2d Cir.1988) (citing Pfeil v. Rogers, 757 F.2d 850 , 859 & n. 15 (7th Cir. 1985) (noting that documents sworn under penalty of perjury may suffice for summary judgment purposes even if they do not meet all of the formal requirements of a notarized affidavit), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1107 , 106 S.Ct. 1513 , 89 L.Ed.2d 912 (1986)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hadeed v. Abraham
See, Pfeil v. Rogers, 757 F.2d 850, 862-63 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1107 , 106 S.Ct. 1513 , 89 L.Ed.2d 912 (1986) (courts deciding summary judgment should disregard legal argument in affidavits).
discussed
Cited "see"
Search Force, Inc. v. Dataforce International, Inc.
See Pfeil v. Rogers, 757 F.2d 850, 859 (7th Cir.1985), cert denied, 475 U.S. 1107 , 106 S.Ct. 1513 , 89 L.Ed.2d 912 (1986); see also Bank of III. v. Allied Signal Safety Restraint Sys., 75 F.3d 1162, 1169 (7th Cir.1996) (referring to sworn statements as ones made under oath).
discussed
Cited "see"
Saboff v. St. John's River Water Management District
See Fields, 953 F.2d at 1307 . “ ‘The Florida doctrine of res judicata bars subsequent litigation where there is (1) identity of the thing sued for, (2) identity of the cause of action, (3) identity of persons and parties to the action, and (4) identity of the quality or capacity of the person for or against whom the claim is made.’ ” Fields, 953 F.2d at 1307 -08 (quoting Amey, Inc. v. Gulf Abstract & Title, Inc., 758 F.2d 1486, 1509 (11th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1107 , 106 S.Ct. 1513 , 89 L.Ed.2d 912 (1986)).
discussed
Cited "see"
IDS Life Insurance v. SunAmerica, Inc.
See Pfeil v. Rogers, 757 F.2d 850, 859 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1107 , 106 S.Ct. 1513 , 89 L.Ed.2d 912 (1986) (a district court should not be unnecessarily hyper-technical and overly harsh on a party who unintentionally fails to make certain that all technical, non-substantive requirements of execution are satisfied).
discussed
Cited "see"
Aquatherm Industries, Inc. v. Florida Power & Light Co.
See Amey, Inc. v. Gulf Abstract & Title, Inc., 758 F.2d 1486, 1509 (11th Cir.1985) (finding that identity of thing sued for existed when plaintiff sued for $2,500 in damages in first suit and $35,000 in second suit), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1107 , 106 S.Ct. 1513 , 89 L.Ed.2d 912 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Chicago District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund v. Cotter
See Pfeil v. Rogers, 757 F.2d 850, 858-59 (7th Cir.1985) (holding court must accept an improperly notarized affidavit if the affiant makes his statement under penalty of perjury), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1107 , 106 S.Ct. 1513 , 89 L.Ed.2d 912 (1986). 10 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Harvey J. Sanner, Warren D. Jones, Also Known as Corky, H. Dean Adkins v. Board of Trade of the City of Chicago, Patrick H. Arbor, Donald G. Andrew
See Amey, Inc. v. Gulf Abstract & Title, Inc., 758 F.2d 1486, 1496 (11th Cir.1985) (plaintiff real estate investment company had standing to sue for alleged price fixing for legal opinions for real estate title insurance despite fact that plaintiff was not in business of procuring or providing legal title opinions or title insurance), ce rt. denied, 475 U.S. 1107 , 106 S.Ct. 1513 , 89 L.Ed.2d 912 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Grand Jury Proceedings No. 92-4: John Doe No. A93-155. United States of America v. Under Seal Under Seal
See In re Grand Jury Subpoena Served Upon Doe, 781 F.2d 238, 248 (2d Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1108 , 106 S.Ct. 1515 , 89 L.Ed.2d 914 (1986) (recognizing that “[f]ee information may be sought as evidence of unexplained wealth which may have been derived from criminal activity”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Stewart v. Ryan
(2×)
See Pfeil v. Rogers, 757 F.2d 850 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1107 , 106 S.Ct. 1513 , 89 L.Ed.2d 912 (1986); Ramsay v. Cooper, 553 F.2d 237 (1st Cir.1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 13,535 Nissim Meshulam v. General Motors Corporation
See Amey, Inc. v. Gulf Abstract & Title, Inc., 758 F.2d 1486, 1509 (11th Cir.1985) (federal courts apply the law of the state that rendered the first judgment to determine the res judicata effect of that judgment), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1107 , 106 S.Ct. 1513 , 89 L.Ed.2d 912 (1986). 3 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Michael J. Vingelli v. United States of America, (Drug Enforcement Agency)
See In re Grand Jury Subpoena Served Upon Doe, 781 F.2d 238, 247 (2d Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1108 , 106 S.Ct. 1515 , 89 L.Ed.2d 914 (1986); accord In re Shargel, 742 F.2d 61, 62 (2d Cir.1984); Colton v. United States, 306 F.2d 633, 637-38 (2d Cir.1962), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 951 , 83 S.Ct. 505 , 9 L.Ed.2d 499 (1963); United States v. Pape, 144 F.2d 778, 782-83 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 323 U.S. 752 , 65 S.Ct. 86 , 89 L.Ed. 602 (1944).
cited
Cited "see"
David Todd v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Incorporated
See Amey, Inc. v. Gulf Abstract & Title, Inc., 758 F.2d 1486, 1505-06 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1107 , 106 S.Ct. 1513 , 89 L.Ed.2d 912 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Duque
Enterprises, Inc., Ill S.Ct. at 726 (quotations and citation omitted); see In re Grand Jury Subpoena (Doe), 781 F.2d 238, 248-49 (2d Cir.1985) (en banc) (noting that “investigative powers of the grand jury necessarily are broad so that it may carry out adequately its task of determining the existence of criminal activity”), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1108 , 106 S.Ct. 1515 , 89 L.Ed.2d 914 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Todd v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
See Amey, Inc. v. Gulf Abstract & Title, Inc., 758 F.2d 1486, 1505-06 (11th Cir.1985), ce rt. denied, 475 U.S. 1107 , 106 S.Ct. 1513 , 89 L.Ed.2d 912 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Estate of Mendiola v. Mendiola
See Pfeil v. Rogers, 757 F.2d 850, 857-8 (7th Cir. 1985), cert. den. 475 U.S. 1107 , 106 S.Ct. 1513 , 89 L.Ed.2d 912 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Avirgan v. Hull
See Amey, Inc. v. Gulf Abstract and Title, Inc., 758 F.2d 1486, 1505 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1107 , 106 S.Ct. 1513 , 89 L.Ed.2d 912 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Goldberger & Dubin, P.C.
See In re Grand Jury Subpoena Served Upon John Doe, 781 F.2d 238, 250-51 (2d Cir.1985) (en banc), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1108 , 106 S.Ct. 1515 , 89 L.Ed.2d 914 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Goldberger & Dubin, P.C.
See In re Grand Jury Subpoena Served Upon John Doe, 781 F.2d 238, 250-51 (2d Cir.1985) (en banc), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1108 , 106 S.Ct. 1515 , 89 L.Ed.2d 914 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Alex Simmons
See In re Grand Jury Subpoena Served Upon Doe, 781 F.2d 238, 251 (2d Cir.1985) (en banc), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1108 , 106 S.Ct. 1515 , 89 L.Ed.2d 914 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Simmons
See In re Grand Jury Subpoena Served Upon Doe, 781 F.2d 238, 251 (2d Cir.1985) (en banc), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1108 , 106 S.Ct. 1515 , 89 L.Ed.2d 914 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
AGS Genasys Corp. v. Nixon
See Basch v. Westinghouse, 777 F.2d 165 , 174 (4th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1108 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Eastern Air Lines, Inc. v. International Ass'n of MacHinists & Aerospace Workers (In Re Ionosphere Clubs, Inc.)
See, Marine Transport Lines, Inc. v. Int’l Org. of Masters, Mates & Pilots, 770 F.2d 1526 , 1530 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1108 , 106 S.Ct. 1514 , 89 L.Ed.2d 913 (1986) (may enjoin unlawful acts threatened or committed); Scott v. Moore, 680 F.2d 979, 986 (5th Cir.1982), rev’d on other grounds sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see"
Lara, Inc. v. South Whitehall Township
(2×)
See Zeleznik v. United States, 770 F.2d 20, 22-23 (3d Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1108 , 106 S.Ct. 1513 , 89 L.Ed.2d 913 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Consolidated Gas Company of Florida, Inc. v. City Gas Company of Florida, a Florida Corporation
See Amey, Inc. v. Gulf Abstract and Title, Inc., 758 F.2d 1486, 1496-97 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1107 , 106 S.Ct. 1513 , 89 L.Ed.2d 912 (1986); Midwestern Waffles, Inc. v. Waffle House, Inc., 734 F.2d 705 (11th Cir.1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Duttle v. Bandler & Kass
See In re Grand Jury Subpoena Served Upon Doe, 781 F.2d 238, 247-48 (2d Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1108 , 106 S.Ct. 1515 , 89 L.Ed.2d 914 (1986); In re Shargel, 742 F.2d 61, 62-63 (2d Cir.1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States Ex Rel. Hollow Metal Warehouse, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
See Pfeil v. Rogers, 757 F.2d 850, 860-63 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1107 , 106 S.Ct. 1513 , 89 L.Ed.2d 912 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
James L. Powell, Jr. v. Department of the Treasury
See Lisiecki v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 769 F.2d 1558, 1562 (Fed.Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1108 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ronald Zepik v. Tidewater Midwest, Inc.
See Pfeil v. Rogers, 757 F.2d 850, 866 (7th Cir.1985) (summary judgment may be affirmed on grounds not relied upon by the district court), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1107 , 106 S.Ct. 1513 , 89 L.Ed.2d 912 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Outlet Communications, Inc. v. King World Productions, Inc.
“A tying arrangement is ‘an agreement by a party to sell one product [the “tying” product] but only on the condition that the buyer also purchases a different (or “tied”) product.’ ” Tic-X-Press, 815 F.2d at 1414 (quoting Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United States, 356 U.S. 1, 5-6 , 78 S.Ct. 514, 518-19 , 2 L.Ed.2d 545 (1958)); see Amey, Inc. v. Gulf Abstract & Title, Inc., 758 F.2d 1486, 1502 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1153 , 106 S.Ct. 1513 , 89 L.Ed.2d 912 (1986); Midwestern Waffles, Inc. v. Waffle House, Inc., 734 F.2d 705, 711 (11th Cir.1984) (per curiam); O…
discussed
Cited "see"
Stephen Tornay, Galene Tornay v. United States of America A.R. Demeter, Special Agent, Internal Revenue Service
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
Accord United States v. (Under Seal), 774 F.2d 624, 627 (4th Cir.1985) (grand jury subpoena to attorney for fee information), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1108 , 106 S.Ct. 1514 , 89 L.Ed.2d 913 (1986); In re Grand Jury Subpoena Served Upon Doe, 781 F.2d 238 (2d Cir.1985) (en banc) (subpoena to attorney), ce rt. denied, 475 U.S. 1108 , 106 S.Ct. 1515 , 89 L.Ed.2d 914 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Smith v. Mobil Oil Corp.
See Amey v. Gulf Abstract & Title, Inc., 758 F.2d 1486 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 1513 , 89 L.Ed.2d 912 (1986) (requiring "evidence of actual coercion by the seller that in fact forced the buyer to [purchase] the tied item,” as part of a plaintiffs prima facie showing).
discussed
Cited "see"
ca11 1987
Times-Picayune Publishing Co. v. United States, 345 U.S. 594, 608-10 , 73 S.Ct. 872, 880-81 , 97 L.Ed. 1277 (1953); International Salt Co. v. United States, 332 U.S. 392, 396 , 68 S.Ct. 12, 15 , 92 L.Ed. 20 (1947); see also Jefferson Parish Hospital District No. 2 v. Hyde, 466 U.S. 2, 9-10 , 104 S.Ct. 1551, 1556-57 , 80 L.Ed.2d 2 (1984). 17 A tying arrangement is "an agreement by a party to sell one product [the "tying" product] but only on the condition that the buyer also purchases a different (or "tied") product." Northern Pacific Railway Co., supra, 356 U.S. at 5-6 , 78 S.Ct. at 518 ; see …
discussed
Cited "see"
Tic-X-Press, Inc. v. Omni Promotions Co. of Georgia
A tying arrangement is “an agreement by a party to sell one product [the “tying” product] but only on the condition that the buyer also purchases a different (or “tied”) product.” Northern Pacific Railway Co., supra, 356 U.S. at 5-6 , 78 S.Ct. at 518 ; see Amey, Inc. v. Gulf Abstract & Title, Inc., 758 F.2d 1486, 1502 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 106 S.Ct. 1513 , 89 L.Ed.2d 912 (1986); Midwestern Waffles, Inc. v. Waffle House, Inc., 734 F.2d 705, 711 (11th Cir.1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
New York Citizens Committee on Cable TV v. Manhattan Cable TV, Inc.
See Amey, Inc. v. Gulf Abstract & Title, Inc., 758 F.2d 1486, 1498-99 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 1513 , 89 L.Ed.2d 912 (1986) (plaintiff’s injury as a consumer in the bank-mortgages market was both a foreseeable and necessary step in furthering the anticompetitive conspiracy in the bank-law firm title services market).
cited
Cited "see"
Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc. v. Newspaper & Magazine Employees Union
See Altermose Construction Co. v. Building & Construction Trades Council, 751 F.2d 653 (3d Cir.1985), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 1513 , 89 L.Ed.2d 912 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Reazin v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Kansas, Inc.
See generally Amey, Inc. v. Gulf Abstract & Title, Inc., 758 F.2d 1486, 1495 (11th Cir.1985), ce rt. denied — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 1513 , 89 L.Ed.2d 912 (1986) (survey of various circuits).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Peeples v. Lampert
See Tyler v. Hartford Insurance Group, 307 Or. 603 , 771 P.2d 274 (1989) (requiring findings by Court of Appeals in cases under ORS 20.105(1)); see also Amey, Inc. v. Gulf Abstract & Title, Inc., 758 F.2d 1486, 1508 (11th Cir. 1985), cert. den. 475 U.S. 1107 , 106 S.Ct. 1513 , 89 L.Ed.2d 912 (1986) (under Florida law, the trial court `must make a specific finding of "complete absence of justiciable issue of either law or fact" or face reversal or remand on the award of attorneys fees.').
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Stuart Cay Marina v. M/V SPECIAL DELIVERY
Clemons v. Dougherty County, 684 F.2d 1365, 1368-69 (11th Cir.1982); see also Amey, Inc. v. Gulf Abstract & Title, Inc., 758 F.2d 1486 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1107 , 106 S.Ct. 1513 , 89 L.Ed.2d 912 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Florida Outdoor Advert., LLC v. City of Boca Raton, Fl
Clemons v. Dougherty County, 684 F.2d 1365, 1368-69 (11th Cir.1982); see also Amey, Inc. v. Gulf Abstract & Title, Inc., 758 F.2d 1486 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1107 , 106 S.Ct. 1513 , 89 L.Ed.2d 912 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gibbs v. Republic Tobacco, L.P.
Id. (citing Albrecht v. State, 444 So.2d 8, 12 (Fla.1984)); see also Fields v. Sarasota Manatee Airport Authority, 953 F.2d 1299, 1307-08 (11th Cir.1992) (citing Amey, Inc. v. Gulf Abstract & Title, Inc., 758 F.2d 1486, 1509 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1107 , 106 S.Ct. 1513 , 89 L.Ed.2d 912 (1986)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Phyllis Jaskey Jones v. Chemetron Corporation
United States v. Kubrick, 444 U.S. 111, 118, 122 (1979) (addressing accrual of claim under Federal Tort Claims Act); see also Zeleznik v. United States, 770 F.2d 20, 22-23 (3d Cir. 1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1108 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jones v. Chemetron Corp.
(2×)
United States v. Kubrick, 444 U.S. 111, 118, 122 , 100 S.Ct. 352 , 62 L.Ed.2d 259 (1979) (addressing accrual of claim under Federal Tort Claims Act); see also Zeleznik v. United States, 770 F.2d 20, 22-23 (3d Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1108 , 106 S.Ct. 1513 , 89 L.Ed.2d 913 (1986).
Zeleznik, Administrator of the Estate of Zeleznik
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 85-885.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 7, 1986.
Published
Citer courts: Third Circuit (2) · W.D. Pennsylvania (1)
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.