green
Positive treatment
7.1 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
20250221_C369042_75_369042.Opn.Pdf
However, our Supreme Court denied Ashen’s application for leave to appeal in that case, Ashen v Assink, 501 Mich 952 , 952 (2018), and it also denied his motion for reconsideration, Ashen v Assink, 501 Mich 1064, 1064 (2018).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Tracey Bennett v. City of Detroit
See, also, Brown v City of Sault St Marie, 501 Mich 1064 ; 910 NW2d 300 (2018) (notice that the plaintiff suffered “severe and permanent injuries” was insufficient on its face to comply with the notice requirement of the highway exception to governmental immunity because it failed to specify the injury that plaintiff sustained in accordance with MCL 691.1404(1)).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
David ASHEN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant-Appellant
v.
Scott ASSINK and Stacy Assink, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs-Appellees.
v.
Scott ASSINK and Stacy Assink, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs-Appellees.
SC: 156265; COA: 331811.
Michigan Supreme Court.
May 1, 2018.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court's January 3, 2018 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.