State v. Mavrogianis, 294 S.E.2d 227 (N.C. 1982). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Mavrogianis, 294 S.E.2d 227 (N.C. 1982). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 5× by 5 distinct cases · …he defendant in this case has not demonstrated any prejudice to him by his absence from a part of the hearing. the evidence elicited was not disputed and there has been no showing that it would have been different had the defendant been present
14 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Revis v. State (alacrimapp, 2011-01-13)
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Revis v. State
Ala. Crim. App. · 2011 · signal: see also · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
he defendant in this case has not demonstrated any prejudice to him by his absence from a part of the hearing. the evidence elicited was not disputed and there has been no showing that it would have been different had the defendant been present
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Hall v. State
Ala. Crim. App. · 2007 · signal: see also · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
he defendant in this case has not demonstrated any prejudice to him by his absence from a part of the hearing. the evidence elicited was not disputed and there has been no showing that it would have been different had the defendant been present
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Borden v. State
Ala. Crim. App. · 1998 · signal: see also · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
he defendant in this case has not demonstrated any prejudice to him by his absence from a part of the hearing. the evidence elicited was not disputed and there has been no showing that it would have been different had the defendant been present
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Ponder v. State
Ala. Crim. App. · 1996 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
he defendant in this case has not demonstrated any prejudice to him by his absence from a part of the hearing. the evidence elicited was not disputed and there has been no showing that it would have been different had the defendant been present
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Harris v. State
Ala. Crim. App. · 1992 · signal: see also · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
he defendant in this case has not demonstrated any prejudice to him by his absence from a part of the hearing. the evidence elicited was not disputed and there has been no showing that it would have been different had the defendant been present
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Gamble v. State
Ala. Crim. App. · 2000 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also State v. Piland, 58 N.C.App. 95 , 293 S.E.2d 278 (1982), appeal dismissed, 306 N.C. 562 , 294 S.E.2d 374 (1982) (`[t]he [capital] defendant in this case has not demonstrated any prejudice to him by his absence from a part of the hearing.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Hall v. State
Ala. Crim. App. · 1999 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also State v. Piland, 58 N.C.App. 95 , 293 S.E.2d 278 (1982), appeal dismissed, 306 N.C. 562 , 294 S.E.2d 374 (1982) (`[t]he [capital] defendant in this case has not demonstrated any prejudice to him by his absence from a part of the hearing.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Melson v. State
Ala. Crim. App. · 1999 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also State v. Piland, 58 N.C.App. 95 , 293 S.E.2d 278 (1982), appeal dismissed, 306 N.C. 562 , 294 S.E.2d 374 (1982) (`[t]he capital defendant in this case has not demonstrated any prejudice to him by his absence from a part of the hearing.
STATE
v.
MAVROGIANIS
No. 275P82.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Aug 3, 1982.
294 S.E.2d 227
Published
1 passages pin-cited by 5 cases
Pinpoint authority: #30,657 of 633,719
Citer courts: Court of Criminal Appeals of A… (5)

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 3 August 1982.