State v. Stanley, 311 S.E.2d 296 (N.C. 1984). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Stanley, 311 S.E.2d 296 (N.C. 1984). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
25 citation events (6 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Simpson v. Specialty Retail Concepts, Inc. (ncmd, 1995-12-01)
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985 2005 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Simpson v. Specialty Retail Concepts, Inc. (2×)
M.D.N.C. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Tar Landing Villas Owners’ Ass’n v. Town of Atlantic Beach, 64 N.C.App. 239, 243 , 307 S.E.2d 181, 184-85 (1983), disc. rev. denied, 310 N.C. 156 , 311 S.E.2d 296 (1984) (“While we recognize these exceptions [regarding mutuality and offensive application] and approve of the expanded doctrine as a way to end vexatious litigation, we, nevertheless, find that it would be inequitable to allow petitioners, even those with privity, to assert the doctrine in this ease.”).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE
v.
STANLEY
No. 562P83.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Jan 10, 1984.
311 S.E.2d 296
Published

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 10 January 1984.