Dolbow v. Holland Indus., Inc., 312 S.E.2d 651 (N.C. 1984). · Go Syfert
Search
Dolbow v. Holland Indus., Inc., 312 S.E.2d 651 (N.C. 1984). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
115 citation events (43 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: KONRADY, EMPLOYEE v. US Airways, Inc. (ncctapp, 2004-08-03)
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984 2005 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) KONRADY, EMPLOYEE v. US Airways, Inc.
N.C. Ct. App. · 2004 · confidence medium
App. 695 , 308 S.E.2d 335 (1983), disc. review denied, 310 N.C. 308 , 312 S.E.2d 651 (1984), the Commission found that the plaintiff was engaging in his job of unloading rods from a truck at a job site “when he stepped into a depression, injuring his knee.” Id. at 697, 308 S.E.2d at 336 .
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Boles v. U.S. Air, Inc.
N.C. Ct. App. · 2002 · confidence medium
App. 695, 697 , 308 S.E.2d 335, 336 (1983) (quoting Anderson v. Lincoln Construction Co., 265 N.C. 431, 434 , 144 S.E.2d 272, 274 (1965)), disc. review denied, 310 N.C. 308 , 312 S.E.2d 651 (1984). *499 “Thus, the Commission may assign more weight and credibility to certain testimony than other.” Id. at 697, 308 S.E.2d at 336 .
cited Cited as authority (rule) Forrest v. Pitt County Board of Education
N.C. Ct. App. · 1990 · confidence medium
Id. at 697, 308 S.E.2d at 336 (citation omitted).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Watkins v. City of Asheville
N.C. Ct. App. · 1990 · confidence medium
Id. at 697, 308 S.E.2d at 336 (citations omitted).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Vandiford v. Stewart Equipment Co. (2×)
N.C. Ct. App. · 1990 · confidence medium
Id. at 696, 308 S.E.2d 336 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Brooks v. Capstar Corp. (2×)
N.C. Ct. App. · 2005 · signal: see also · confidence low
See id. at 710-11 , 599 S.E.2d at 515 ; see also Dolbow v. Holland Industrial, 64 N.C.App. 695, 696 , 308 S.E.2d 335, 336 (1983), disc. review denied, 310 N.C. 308 , 312 S.E.2d 651 (1984) (citation omitted) (review of the Commission's order is two-fold: "(1) whether there was any competent evidence before the Commission to support its findings of fact; and (2) whether ... the findings of fact of the Commission justify its legal conclusions and decisions.") The Commission found that: (1) the Cracker Barrel job was not suitable for plaintiff pursuant to Dr. Carlton's restrictions (despite such r…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kenneth DOLBOW, Employee, Plaintiff,
v.
HOLLAND INDUSTRIAL, INC., Employer, and Commercial Union Insurance Companies, Carrier, Defendants.
592P83.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Feb 2, 1984.
312 S.E.2d 651
Published

Smith, Moore, Smith, Schell & Hunter, Greensboro, for defendants.

Kenneth Dolbow, plaintiff, pro se.

Case below: 64 N.C.App. 695, 308 S.E.2d 335.

Defendants' petition for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 Denied.