green
Positive treatment
2.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Rouse v. Duke University
(2×)
See Briggs v. Rosenthal, 73 N.C.App. 672, 677 , 327 S.E.2d 308, 311 , cert. denied, 314 N.C. 114 , 332 S.E.2d 479 (1985) (explaining that to be extreme and outrageous, conduct must “go beyond all possible bounds of decency, and ... be regarded as atrocious, and utterly intolerable in a civilized community” (citing Restatement (Second) of Torts § 46, cmt. d)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Cater v. Barker
(2×)
See Boyd v. Watts, 73 N.C.App. 566, 570 , 327 S.E.2d 46, 49 (a party asserting breach of contract must have first performed his promise or offered to do so in order to preserve his rights under the contract (citations omitted)), disc. rev. allowed, 314 N.C. 114 , 332 S.E.2d 479 (1985), rev'd on other grounds, 316 N.C. 622 , 342 S.E.2d 840 (1986).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Warren BRIGGS and wife, Gloria Briggs
v.
John ROSENTHAL and the Sun Publishing Co., Inc.
v.
John ROSENTHAL and the Sun Publishing Co., Inc.
271P85.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Jul 3, 1985.
Cited by 41 opinions | Published
Alexander & Associates, Chapel Hill, for plaintiffs.
Smith, Patterson, Follin, Curtis, James & Harkavy, Greensboro, and Northern & Little, Chapel Hill, for defendants.
Plaintiffs' petition for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals. Denied.