green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
3.5 score
“designation "manager" implies general power and permits a reasonable inference that he was vested with the general conduct and control of defendant's business . . ., and his acts are, when committed in the line of his duty and in the scope of his employment, those of the company”
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Marlow v. NC EMPLOYMENT SEC. COM'N
designation "manager" implies general power and permits a reasonable inference that he was vested with the general conduct and control of defendant's business..., and his acts are, when committed in the line of his duty and in the scope of his employment, those of the company
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Marlow v. North Carolina Employment Security Commission
designation "manager" implies general power and permits a reasonable inference that he was vested with the general conduct and control of defendant's business . . ., and his acts are, when committed in the line of his duty and in the scope of his employment, those of the company
discussed
Cited "see"
Riley v. Debaer
(2×)
See Hogan v. Forsyth Country Club Co., 79 N.C.App. 483 , 340 S.E.2d 116 , rev. denied by 317 N.C. 334 , 346 S.E.2d 140 (1986) (holding that the exclusivity provisions of the Workers' Compensation Act did not bar a claim of IIED against the employer based on the allegation of sexual harassment); Brown v. Burlington Industries, Inc., 93 N.C.App. 431 , 378 S.E.2d 232 , rev. allowed by 325 N.C. 270 , 384 S.E.2d 513 , cert. allowed by 325 N.C. 704 , 387 S.E.2d 55 (1989), and rev. dismissed as improvidently granted by 326 N.C. 356 , 388 S.E.2d 769 (1990) (holding that the exclusivity provisions of t…
discussed
Cited "see"
Waddle v. Sparks
(2×)
See Hogan v. Forsyth Country Club Co., 79 N.C.App. 483 , 340 S.E.2d 116 , disc. review denied, 317 N.C. 334 , 346 S.E.2d 140 (1986). *688 In summary, we hold that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment against plaintiff Waddle and did not err in granting summary judgment against plaintiff Simpson and remand to the trial court for action consistent with this opinion.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
English v. General Electric Co.
(2×)
See, e.g., Hogan v. Forsyth Country Club Co., 79 N.C.App. 483 , 340 S.E.2d 116 , disc. rev. denied, 317 N.C. 334 , 346 S.E.2d 140 (1986); Woodruff v. Miller, 64 N.C.App. 364 , 307 S.E.2d 176 (1983).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Marlene HOGAN, April Cornatzer, and Sonya Mitchell
v.
FORSYTH COUNTRY CLUB COMPANY.
v.
FORSYTH COUNTRY CLUB COMPANY.
227P86.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Jul 2, 1986.
Published
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of North Caro… (2)
Kennedy, Kennedy, Kennedy & Kennedy, Winston-Salem, for plaintiffs.
Womble, Carlyle, Sandridge & Rice, Winston-Salem, for defendant
ORDER
Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiffs in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. § 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 2nd day of July 1986."