green
Positive treatment
2.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 2003 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2003
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re CLC
See In re Clark, 151 N.C.App. 286, 289-90 , 565 S.E.2d 245, 247-48 , disc. rev. denied, 356 N.C. 302 , 570 S.E.2d 501 (2002) (termination of the respondent's parental rights reversed where the respondent was incarcerated and evidence was insufficient to find he was unable to care for his child).
discussed
Cited "see"
In re C.L.C.
See In re Clark, 151 N.C.App. 286 , 289-90, 565 S.E.2d 245 , 247-48, disc. rev. denied, 356 N.C. 302 , 570 S.E.2d 501 (2002) (termination of the respondent's parental rights reversed where the respondent was incarcerated and evidence was insufficient to find he was unable to care for his child).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re LH
See, e.g., In re Clark, 151 N.C.App. 286, 289-90 , 565 S.E.2d 245, 248 (holding that trial court erred in concluding that incarcerated father was incapable of providing for his daughter's care when father provided DSS with names of several close relatives who might be "willing and able" to care for his daughter until his release from prison, but DSS never contacted those individuals and instead placed child with maternal cousin), disc. review denied, 356 N.C. 302 , 570 S.E.2d 501 (2002).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
IN RE PINEAULT
No. 468P02.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Oct 3, 2002.
Cited by 6 opinions | Published
Petition by respondent (Pineault) for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 3 October 2002.