State v. Ingram, 592 S.E.2d 687 (N.C. 2004). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Ingram, 592 S.E.2d 687 (N.C. 2004). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
39 citation events (39 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: In re L.I. (ncctapp, 2010-07-06)
Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2004 2015 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
cited Cited as authority (rule) In re L.I.
N.C. Ct. App. · 2010 · confidence medium
On review, the Supreme Court reversed per curiam the majority’s decision “[f]or the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion[.]” Phelps, 358 N.C. at 142 , 592 S.E.2d at 687-88.
cited Cited as authority (rule) In Re Li
N.C. Ct. App. · 2010 · confidence medium
On review, the Supreme Court reversed per curiam the majority's decision "[f]or the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion[.]" Phelps, 358 N.C. at 142 , 592 S.E.2d at 687-88.
STATE of North Carolina
v.
Jay Efram INGRAM.
545A03.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Mar 5, 2004.
592 S.E.2d 687
Per Curiam.
Published

Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by W. Wallace Finlator, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Duncan B. McCormick, Lillington, for defendant-appellant.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.