In the Matter of Est. of Pope, 673 S.E.2d 129 (N.C. 2009). · Go Syfert
Search
In the Matter of Est. of Pope, 673 S.E.2d 129 (N.C. 2009). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
10 citation events (10 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Krueger v. CRIM. JUST. ED. STANDARDS COM'N (ncctapp, 2009-08-04)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Krueger v. CRIM. JUST. ED. STANDARDS COM'N
N.C. Ct. App. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Estate of Pope, ___ N.C.App. ___, ___, 666 S.E.2d 140, 147 (2008) ("While it is true that a trial court may not, on summary judgment, make findings of fact resolving disputed issues of fact, when— as here—the material facts are undisputed, an order may include a recitation of those undisputed facts."), disc. review denied, 363 N.C. 126 , 673 S.E.2d 129 (2009).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of the ESTATE OF John W. POPE, Jr., Jane Forbes Pope
v.
Thomas J. Rollins, of the Estate of John W. Pope, Jr., Amanda Joyce Pope and James Arthur Pope, in their capacities as co-Trustees of the Pope Family Trust for the benefit of John W. Pope, Jr., and The John William Pope Foundation
No. 462P08..
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Feb 5, 2009.
673 S.E.2d 129
Alexander C. Dale, Wilmington, Stuart B. Dorsett, Raleigh, for Jane Pope., *130Johnny M. Loper, Jean T. Adams, Elizabeth Arias, Winston-Salem, Sarah L. Buthe, for Rollins, et al.
Published

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 6th day of October 2008 by Petitioner (Jane Pope) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th day of February 2009."