Wechsler v. Bowman, 35 N.E.2d 930 (NY 1941). · Go Syfert
Search
Wechsler v. Bowman, 35 N.E.2d 930 (NY 1941). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
20 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Whitney v. Citibank (ca2, 1986-01-23)
Treatment trajectory · 1958 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1958 1992 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Whitney v. Citibank (2×)
2d Cir. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See Wechsler v. Bowman, 285 N.Y. 284, 291 , 34 N.E.2d 322 , modified, 286 N.Y. 582 , 35 N.E.2d 930 (1941); 5 Scott on Trusts Sec. 506 (3rd Ed.1967)." The claim was early recognized by New York state courts.
discussed Cited "see" Whitney v. Citibank, N.A. (2×)
2d Cir. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See Wechsler v. Bowman, 285 N.Y. 284, 291 , 34 N.E.2d 322 , modified, 286 N.Y. 582 , 35 N.E.2d 930 (1941); 5 Scott on Trusts § 506 (3rd Ed.1967).” The claim was early recognized by New York state courts.
discussed Cited "see" In re Persky
N.Y. App. Div. · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See Wechsler v. Bowman, 285 N.Y. 284 , 291 * * * modified, 286 N.Y. 582 *** (1941); 5 Scott on Trusts, § 506 (3rd Ed. 1967).” The Circuit Court focused on the role of respondent Persky in the wrongdoing (Newburger, Loeb & Co. v Gross, supra, p 1080): “We also reject Finley, Rumble’s argument that it cannot be held liable for the acts of the Partnership and the Corporation.
discussed Cited "see" Newburger, Loeb & Co. v. Gross (2×)
2d Cir. · 1977 · signal: see · confidence high
See Wechsler v. Bowman, 285 N.Y. 284, 291 , 34 N.E.2d 322 , modified, 286 N.Y. 582 , 35 N.E.2d 930 (1941); 5 Scott on Trusts, § 506 (3rd Ed. 1967).
discussed Cited "see" Newburger, Loeb & Co. v. Gross (2×)
2d Cir. · 1977 · signal: see · confidence high
See Wechsler v. Bowman, 285 N.Y. 284, 291 , 34 N.E.2d 322 , modified, 286 N.Y. 582 , 35 N.E.2d 930 (1941); 5 Scott on Trusts, § 506 (3rd Ed. 1967). 77 Turning first to the claims of Donoghue and Bleich, we agree with Judges Ward and Owen that the transfer of the Partnership assets without the consent of Donoghue and Bleich was a violation of section 98 of New York Partnership Law.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Stella Wechsler Et Al., as Executors of Sigmund Wechsler, Deceased, Appellants,
v.
Abraham M. Bowman Et Al., Formerly Copartners Under the Firm Name of Byrne & Bowman Et Al., Respondents
New York Court of Appeals.
Jun 12, 1941.
35 N.E.2d 930
Cited by 13 opinions  |  Published

Motion for reargument denied. Motions to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and and when returned it will be amended to read as follows:

“ Judgments reversed and judgment directed against the defendants William J. Byrne, as administrator of the goods, chattels and credits of John Byrne, deceased, Abraham M. Bowman and Byrne & Bowman, Inc., for the sum of $8,700 with interest from March 3, 1928, and with costs in all courts.
“ Judgments as to Stewart Forshay and Jacob Applebaum, as administrator of the goods, chattels and credits of Nathan Applebaum, deceased, affirmed without costs.” (See 285 N. Y. 284.)