Mickel v. State, 429 N.E.2d 423 (NY 1981). · Go Syfert
Search
Mickel v. State, 429 N.E.2d 423 (NY 1981). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
9 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Emma A. Mickel, Appellant,
v.
State of New York Et Al., Respondents
Claim 60670.
New York Court of Appeals.
Oct 13, 1981.
429 N.E.2d 423
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL, Dennis H. Cleary for appellant., Robert Abrams, Attorney-General (Stanley Fishman and Shirley Adelson Siegel of counsel), for respondents.
Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer Concur.
Cited by 6 opinions  |  Published

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum opinion of that court (77 AD2d 794). We note that claimant’s application for permission to file a late claim stating a cause of action for trespass arising out of the same transactions was denied. The issues presented on that application were not before the Appellate Division and are not now before us, and appellant now presses only a claim grounded in the theory of de facto appropriation. Accordingly, we do not reach the trespass issues.

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.