green
Positive treatment
8.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Lazar v. City of New York
Ctr., 449 N.E.2d 406, 408 (N.Y. 1983)). “[T]he court cannot recognize a duty based entirely on the foreseeability of the harm at issue . . . .” In re NYC Asbestos Litig., 59 N.E.3d at 469 .
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Abdulaziz v. McKinsey & Company, Inc.
Ctr., 449 N.E.2d 406, 408 (N.Y. 1983)). “[T]he court cannot recognize a duty based entirely on the foreseeability of the harm at issue.” In re New York City Asbestos Litig., 59 N.E.3d at 469 .
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
North Pacific Insurance v. Stucky
(2×)
Co., 295 A.2d 862, 863 (N.J. 1972); DeAngelis, 449 N.E.2d at 407; Vaughn v. Clarkson, 376 S.E.2d 236, 238 (N.C. 1989); Butz v. World Wide, Inc., 492 N.W.2d 88, 93 (N.D. 1992); Norwest v. Presbyterian Intercommunity Hosp., 652 P.2d 318, 319 (Ore. 1982); Steiner v. Bell Tel.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Robinson v. Hartzell Propeller Inc.
Ctr., 58 N.Y.2d 1053 , 462 N.Y.S.2d 626 , 449 N.E.2d 406, 407 (1983).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Hamilton v. Accu-Tek
In De Angelis v. Lutheran Medical Ctr., 58 N.Y.2d 1053, 1055 , 462 N.Y.S.2d 626 , 627, 449 N.E.2d 406, 407 (1983), it declared: “In fixing the bounds of ... duty, not only logic and science, but policy play an important role.” The question of handgun manufacturers’ duty to market and distribute their product responsibly arises at the intersection of two types of cases—those concerning liability for the acts of third parties and those concerning the duties of manufacturers under the law of negligence and strict liability.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Sheldon v. Phh Corporation
Ctr., 58 N.Y.2d 1053, 1055 , 462 N.Y.S.2d 626 , 627, 449 N.E.2d 406, 407 (1983).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Sheldon v. PHH Corp.
Ctr., 58 N.Y.2d 1053, 1055 , 462 N.Y.S.2d 626 , 627, 449 N.E.2d 406, 407 (1983).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Andrulonis v. United States
The delineation of the bounds of the public duty of an individual who exposes another to the risk of harm is dependent on social policy as much as "logic and science." DeAngelis v. Lutheran Medical Center, 58 N.Y.2d 1053, 1055 , 462 N.Y.S.2d 626 , 627, 449 N.E.2d 406, 407 (1983).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Sound of Market Street, Inc. v. Continental Bank International
In determining whether to impose tort liability, "policy play[sJ an important role." De Angelis v. Lutheran Medical Center, 58 N.Y.2d 1053 , 462 N.Y.S.2d 626 , 627, 449 N.E.2d 406, 407 (1983); accord Sinn v. Burd, 486 Pa. 146 , 404 A.2d 672, 681 (1979); Bradshaw v. Rawlings, 612 F.2d at 138 .
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Siciliano v. Capitol City Shows, Inc.
See Corso v. Merrill, 119 N.H. 647, 654 , 406 A.2d 300, 304-05 (1979); see also Baxter v. Superior Court of Los Angeles Cty., 138 Cal. Rptr. 315 , 317, 19 Cal. 3d 461, 464 , 563 P.2d 871, 873 (1977); DeAngelis v. Lutheran Medical Center, 58 N.Y.2d 1053, 1055 , 462 N.Y.S.2d 626 , 627-28, 449 N.E.2d 406, 407-08 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Thompson v. Love
(2×)
Concerns of the defendants in allowing the Court, instead of the legislature, to decide this issue include: (1) the possibility of increased litigation and multiple claims; See DeAngelis v. Lutheran Medical Center, 58 N.Y.2d 1053, 1055 , 449 N.E.2d 406, 407 , 462 N.Y.S.2d 626 (1983); Gray v. Suggs, 292 Ark. 19, 20 , 728 S.W.2d 148 (1987); Borer v. American Airlines, Inc., 19 Cal.3d 441 , 138 Cal. Rptr. 302 , 563 P.2d 858, 860, 862 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Fontaine v. Ryan
(2×)
See De Angelis v. Lutheran Medical Center, 58 N.Y.2d 1053 , 462 N.Y.S.2d 626 , 627, 449 N.E.2d 406, 407 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Eleanor M. Stagl v. Delta Airlines, Inc.
(2×)
Corp., 83 N.Y.2d 579, 585 , 611 N.Y.S.2d 817, 820 , 634 N.E.2d 189, 192 (1994); see also De Angelis v. Lutheran Medical Center, 58 N.Y.2d 1053, 1055 , 462 N.Y.S.2d 626 , 627-28, 449 N.E.2d 406, 407-08 (1983), we also note that New York courts do not exercise this authority on an ad hoc basis.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of Michael J. Golden
v.
James H. Tully, Jr., Constituting the New York State Tax Commission
v.
James H. Tully, Jr., Constituting the New York State Tax Commission
New York Court of Appeals.
Mar 29, 1983.
449 N.E.2d 406
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL, Robert Abrams, Attorney-General (Francis V. Dow and Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for appellants., Michael J. Golden and Carol A. Golden, respondents pro se.
Cited by 7 opinions | Published
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The judgment of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
[*1049] In response to the taxpayers’ demand for a bill of particulars, it was admitted that petitioners’ nonresidence in “New York State was determinative of the disallowance of said moving expenses.” No other rationale was then proffered to justify the discrepancy in treating residents and nonresidents. Consequently, it must be concluded that, in the present matter, respondent’s determination unconstitutionally discriminated against the nonresident taxpayers (see US Const, art IV, § 2, cl 1).
Chief Judge Cooke and. Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg, Meyer and Simons concur.
Judgment affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.