People ex rel. Arroyo v. New York State Bd. of Parole, 727 N.E.2d 1252 (NY 2000). · Go Syfert
Search
People ex rel. Arroyo v. New York State Bd. of Parole, 727 N.E.2d 1252 (NY 2000). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
10 citation events (10 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Lennon v. Charney (nysupct, 2005-06-14)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Lennon v. Charney
N.Y. Sup. Ct. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
The lawful passage of the New York City Domestic Partnerships Law (Administrative Code of City of NY § 3-240 et seq.; see, Slattery v City of New York, 266 AD2d 24 [1st Dept 1999], appeal dismissed 94 NY2d 897 [2000], lv dismissed in part and denied in part 95 NY2d 823 [2000]) does not compel a different result.
discussed Cited "see" Heinsma v. City of Vancouver
Wash. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See Slattery v. City of New York, 266 A.D.2d 24, 25 , 697 N.Y.S.2d 603, 605 (1999) (concluding that extending benefits to domestic partners did not transform the relationship into a common law marriage and that substantial differences exist between marriage and domestic partnership), appeal dismissed, 94 N.Y.2d 897 , 706 N.Y.S.2d 699 (2000).
discussed Cited "see" Heinsma v. City of Vancouver
Wash. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See Slattery v. City of New York, 266 A.D.2d 24, 25 , 697 N.Y.S.2d 603 (1999) (concluding that extending benefits to domestic partners did not transform the relationship into a common law marriage and that substantial differences exist between marriage and domestic partnership), appeal dismissed, 94 N.Y.2d 897 , 706 N.Y.S.2d 699 , 727 N.E.2d 1253 (2000).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
The People of the State of New York ex rel. Scott R. Arroyo
v.
New York State Board of Parole
New York Court of Appeals.
Feb 29, 2000.
727 N.E.2d 1252
Published

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that relator has been released from custody and, therefore, his liberty is no longer restrained to such a degree as to entitle him to the extraordinary writ of habeas corpus (see, People ex rel. Wilder v Markley, 26 NY2d 648).