green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
8.7 score
“the law does not ordinarily impose upon a defrauded person the duty of investigating fraudulent claims . . . . even negligence in ascertaining the true facts has been held not to bar the right of recovery”
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,262 Samuel Mallis and Franklyn Kupferman v. Bankers Trust Co., and Third Party v. Jerome B. Kates, Third Party and Jack J. Arnold, Third Party
the law does not ordinarily impose upon a defrauded person the duty of investigating fraudulent claims . . . . even negligence in ascertaining the true facts has been held not to bar the right of recovery
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Mallis v. Bankers Trust Co.
the law does not ordinarily impose upon a defrauded person the duty of investigating fraudulent claims even negligence in ascertaining the true facts has been held not to bar the right of recovery
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ruth H. Gottesman, as Administratrix D. B. N. of the Estate of Max Hellman
v.
Phyl Realty Corporation
v.
Phyl Realty Corporation
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Feb 7, 1956.
Published
Citer courts: Second Circuit (2)
Orders unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondents. No opinion. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Bastow, Botein, Rabin and Bergen, JJ.