Sommer v. Gen. Bronze Corp., 238 N.E.2d 317 (NY 1968). · Go Syfert
Search
Sommer v. Gen. Bronze Corp., 238 N.E.2d 317 (NY 1968). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for cluster 5676688.
Sigmund Sommer, Appellant-Respondent
v.
General Bronze Corporation, , Respondents Hays, Algase, Feuer, Porter & Spanier v. Sigmund Sommer, Appellant-Respondent, and General Bronze Corporation
New York Court of Appeals.
Apr 11, 1968.
238 N.E.2d 317
Published

Motion to amend remittitur denied. Since cross appeals are here involved, neither party is entitled to costs. With respect to interest, there is no need for any amendment since, as we read the Appellate Division opinion, the proceeds of the letter of credit, to which defendant-respondent-appellant is entitled, include interest (as sought by said party) upon the escrow deposit of $400,000. [See 21 N Y 2d 775.]