green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 6×
36.4 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 2018 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2018
2022
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Harmon
(2×)
also: Cited as authority (rule)
under article i, section 9, of the oregon constitution, before a police officer may stop a citizen for a traffic violation, the officer must have probable cause to believe that a viola- tion occurred.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Harmon
(2×)
also: Cited as authority (rule)
under article i, section 9, of the oregon constitution, before a police officer may stop a citizen for a traffic violation, the officer must have probable cause to believe that a viola- tion occurred.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Zimmer
f a victim has incurred economic damages, the court may order that any portion of the fine imposed be shared with the victim, even if there is no evidence of the specific amount of economic damages incurred.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Zimmer
f a victim has incurred economic damages, the court may order that any portion of the fine imposed be shared with the victim, even if there is no evidence of the specific amount of economic damages incurred.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Coast Village Prop. Owners v. Sharp Revocable Trust
in the absence of an explicit assignment of the bur- den of proof, we assume that the ordinary rule applies that the burden to establish the fact falls on the proponent of the fact
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Hughes
under article i, section 9, of the oregon constitution, before a police officer may stop a citizen for a traffic violation, the officer must have probable cause to believe that a violation occurred.
cited
Cited "see"
Dombrowsky and Beaumont
See Fenner v. Fenner, 288 Or App 540 , 546, 405 P3d 159 (2017), rev den, 362 Or 665 (2018).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mesch v. Unity Center for Behavioral Health
See State v. Husk, 288 Or App 737 , 739, 407 P3d 932 , rev den, 362 Or 665 (2017) (explaining that whether the facts establish probable cause for a traffic stop is a question of law reviewed for legal error).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Morrison
See State v. Kellison, 289 Or App 55 , 407 P3d 978 (2017), rev den, 362 Or 665 (2018) (plain error to impose compensatory fine in addi- tion to punitive fine).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Ketchem
See State v. Rivera-Ortiz, 288 Or App 284 , 293, 406 P3d 73 (2017), rev den, 362 Or 665 (2018) (officer’s training and experience supported the specific opinions provided).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Layton
See id. at 529, 533 (concluding that an officer had probable cause to stop the defendant for failing to maintain a lane where the vehicle’s passenger-side tires abruptly crossed into a bicycle lane for about two sec- onds and occupied about half of the lane); see also State v. Husk, 288 Or App 737 , 740-41, 407 P3d 932 (2017), rev den, 362 Or 665 (2018) (concluding that an officer had probable cause to stop the defendant for failing to maintain a lane where her vehicle “briefly” “straddled” the dividing line of two lanes).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Young v. Collins
See, e.g., State v. Rivera-Ortiz, 288 Or App 284 , 293, 406 P3d 73 (2017), rev den, 362 Or 665 (2018) (expert testimony regarding the “general movements of the vehicles after impact and that defendant’s car was Nonprecedential Memo Op: 337 Or App 772 (2025) 777 moving at a ‘higher rate of speed’ when the vehicles collided * * * based on the physical evidence” constituted expert opin- ion); see also Southard v. Belanger, 966 F Supp 2d 727, 734 (WD Ky 2013) (excluding expert testimony from an accident reconstructionist that “using a cell phone while driving reduces a driver’s situa…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Cowan
State v. Ehly, 317 Or 66, 75 , 854 P2d 421 (1993); see also State v. Husk, 288 Or App 737 , 739, 407 P3d 932 , rev den, 362 Or 665 (2018) (establishing that in conducting such review, we determine “[w]hether the facts establish[ed] probable cause to stop [the defendant] for a traffic violation”).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Lister
See, e.g., State v. Kellison, 289 Or App 55 , 57, 407 P3d 978 (2017), rev den, 362 Or 665 (2018); State v. Nichols, 281 Or App 658, 659-60 , 383 P3d 988 (2016).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Riekens
That is all that is required for the imposition of a compensatory fine. 301 Or App at 452 (noting “the amount of a compensatory fine does not have to tie to the amount of damages—if a victim incurred any economic damages, the court may order a por- tion of a fine imposed as a penalty to be shared with the victim”); see also State v. Kellison, 289 Or App 55 , 56-57, 407 P3d 978 (2017), rev den, 362 Or 665 (2018) (rejecting the state’s concession that “the record lacked sufficient evidence to establish that the victim had incurred pecuniary harm,” and that therefore the trial court e…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Arthur L. PARKER, DMD, Inc.
v.
TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CONNECTICUT
v.
TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CONNECTICUT
A163510(S065598).
Oregon Supreme Court.
Mar 22, 2018.
Published
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of Oregon (6)
Review Denied.