green
Positive treatment
10.4 score
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
HUBBARD (CORY) VS. STATE
In Wallin v. State, this court held that prior bad act evidence was admissible where the defense placed intent at issue, but the case involved a prosecution for battery, a SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 7A 8 general intent crime. 93 Nev. 10, 11, 558 P.2d 1143, 1143-44 (1977); see NRS 200.481 (defining battery).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
HUBBARD (CORY) VS. STATE
In Wallin v. State, this court held that prior bad act evidence was admissible where the defense placed intent at issue, but the case involved a prosecution for battery, a SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 7A 8 general intent crime. 93 Nev. 10, 11, 558 P.2d 1143, 1143-44 (1977); see NRS 200.481 (defining battery).
cited
Cited "see"
Gonzales (Yadhir) v. State
See Wallin v. State, 93 Nev. 10, 11 , 558 P.2d 1143, 1144 (1977).
WARDEN, NEVADA STATE PRISON
v.
ERNEST M. MERCADO
v.
ERNEST M. MERCADO
No. 9402.
Nevada Supreme Court.
Jan 19, 1977.
Robert List, Attorney General, and David B. Small, Deputy Attorney General, Carson City, for Appellant., Horace R. Goff, State Public Defender, and David Mathews, Deputy Public Defender, Carson City, for Respondent.
Published
OPINION
On the authority of, and for the same reasons stated in, State v. Wright, 92 Nev. 734, 558 P.2d 1139 (1976), we, sua sponte, reverse the district court’s order which granted respondent’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus.