State v. Lobo, 226 P.3d 709 (Or. 2010). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Lobo, 226 P.3d 709 (Or. 2010). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“whether a trial court erred in imposing a compensatory fine is a question of law.”
20 citation events (20 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Haines (orctapp, 2010-11-03)
Treatment trajectory · 2010 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2010 2018 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) State v. Haines
Or. Ct. App. · 2010 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
whether a trial court erred in imposing a compensatory fine is a question of law.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE
v.
LOBO.
S058221.
Oregon Supreme Court.
Feb 16, 2010.
226 P.3d 709
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 71%
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of Oregon (1)

Miscellaneou Supreme Court Disposition.

Certified Questions, Certified Appeals, Mandamus Proceedings, and other Matter.

Alternative writ of mandamus issued.