State Ex Rel Dep't of Human Servs. v. Smith, 80 P.3d 522 (Or. Ct. App. 2003). · Go Syfert
Search
State Ex Rel Dep't of Human Servs. v. Smith, 80 P.3d 522 (Or. Ct. App. 2003). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
13 citation events (13 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State ex rel. Department of Human Services v. Smith (or, 2005-02-17)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) State ex rel. Department of Human Services v. Smith
Or. · 2005 · confidence medium
Id., 191 Or App at 138.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of Jon Bow Robert Michael Lea Smith, a Minor Child. STATE ex rel DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent,
v.
Diana Marie SMITH, Appellant.
J020938 A121395.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Nov 26, 2003.
80 P.3d 522
Landau, Presiding Judge, and Armstrong and Brewer, Judges.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

Clayton C. Patrick, Dallas, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Devorah Signer-Hill, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General.

Before LANDAU, Presiding Judge, and ARMSTRONG and BREWER, Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. State ex rel Dept. of Human Services v. Smith, (A119798), 190 Or.App. 570, 79 P.3d 374 (2003).

LANDAU, P.J., concurs.

LANDAU, P.J., concurring.

I would conclude that the state failed to establish by clear and convincing evidence the requirements of the statute and would vote to reverse. However, this case is materially indistinguishable from State ex rel Dept. of Human Services v. Smith, (A119798), 190 Or.App. 570, 79 P.3d 374 (2003). In light of the court's decision in that[*523] case, I therefore concur in affirming the judgment in this case.

ARMSTRONG, J., joins in this concurring opinion.