green
Positive treatment
4.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
ABKCO Music, Inc. v. Westminster Music, Ltd.
See Rooney v. Columbia Pictures Ind’s, 538 F.Supp. 211, 226-28 (S.D.N.Y.), affd without opinion, 714 F.2d 117 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1084 , 103 S.Ct. 1774 , 76 L.Ed.2d 346 (1983) (holding that expansive language in series of contracts granting general ■ license to exhibit films encompassed right to distribute films by means of later- *156 developed video technology); Filmvideo Releasing Corp. v. Hastings, 446 F.Supp. 725 (S.D.N.Y.1978) (holding that the author’s explicit retention of “all” television rights to licensed books, in 1935 grant of motion picture rights, inc…
discussed
Cited "see"
ca9 1993
See Rooney v. Columbia Pictures Indus., Inc., 538 F.Supp. 211 (S.D.N.Y.) aff'd without opinion, 714 F.2d 117 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1084 (1983); Platinum Record Co. v. Lucasfilm, Ltd., 566 F.Supp. 226, 228 (D.N.J.1983).
cited
Cited "see"
William H. Hernstadt v. Federal Communications Comm'n
See Central Florida Enterprises, Inc. v. FCC, 683 F.2d 503 (D.C.Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1084 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Shurberg Broadcasting of Hartford, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Astroline Communications Co., Intervenor
(2×)
See Central Florida Enterprises v. FCC, 683 F.2d 503 , 506-07 (D.C.Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1084 , 103 S.Ct. 1774 , 76 L.Ed.2d 346 (1983). 22 Shurberg's only alternatives would be to purchase a station in the open market, assuming one is available, or hope that a new station is licensed in Hartford--something the Commission has indicated no intention of doing. 23 To label, as does the dissent, Shurberg's lost opportunity for a license as a mere potential "windfall" is to belittle the hardship that he suffers in losing that unique opportunity solely because of his race. 58 The dissent …
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Marra
See State v. Carrione, 188 Conn. 681, 685-86 , 453 A.2d 1137 (1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1084 , 103 S. Ct. 1775 , 76 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Tatem
It must be pointed out that the legislature, in enacting the “no unfavorable inferences” statute embodied in § 54-84 (b), “ ‘has chosen specific means to effectuate a fundamental right . . . .’ ” State v. Carter, supra, 581 ; State v. Burke, 182 Conn. 330, 331-32 , 438 A.2d 93 (1980); see State v. Carrione, 188 Conn. 681 , 685 n.3, 453 A.2d 1137 (1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1084 , 103 S. Ct. 1775 , 76 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Blue Creek Coal, Inc. v. Commissioner
See Zack v. Commissioner, 692 F.2d 28 (6th Cir. 1982) , affg. a Memorandum Opinion of this Court, cert. denied 460 U.S. 1084 (1983) .
cited
Cited "see"
George W. Lukovsky and Elizabeth L. Lukovsky v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
See Lukovsky v. Commissioner, 692 F.2d 527 (8th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1084 , 103 S.Ct. 1776 , 76 L.Ed.2d 347 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
John Bloom and Jim Atkinson v. Hearst Entertainment, Inc.
See also, Rooney v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc., 538 F.Supp. 211 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd, 714 F.2d 117 (2nd Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1084 , 103 S.Ct. 1774 , 76 L.Ed.2d 346 (1983); Brown v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp., 799 F.Supp. 166 (D.D.C.1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Evergreen v. Six Consignments
Compare Goodpasture, Inc. v. M/V Pollux, 602 F.2d 84 , 87 _______ _________________ __________ (5th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1084 (1983) (identifying _____ ______ elements of conversion claim in admiralty), with, e.g., Joseph R. ____ ____ Nolan & Laurie J.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Evergreen Marine Corp. v. Six Consignments of Frozen Scallops
Compare Goodpasture, Inc. v. M/V Pollux, 602 F.2d 84 , 87 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1084 , 103 S.Ct. 1775 , 76 L.Ed.2d 347 (1983) (identifying elements of conversion claim in admiralty), with, e.g., Joseph R.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Lizzi
We have held that in “a prosecution for embezzlement such as this, the range of relevant evidence is wide, especially as it bears on the essential element of an intent to defraud, which involves a state of mind and can generally be proved only by circumstantial evidence.” State v. Harris, supra, 601 ; see also State v. Carrione, 188 Conn. 681, 692 , 453 A.2d 1137 (1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1084 , 103 S. Ct. 1775 , 76 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Reliance Insurance v. Market Motors, Inc.
Although the appropriate measure of damages in a case such as this is the fair market value of the property at the time the party is deprived of its use, see, e.g., Savoy Construction Co. v. Atchison & Keller, Inc., 388 A.2d 1221 (D.C. 1978), “the market that determines the measure of recovery ... is that to which [the party] would have to resort in order to replace the subject matter." RESTATEMENT (SECOND) OF TORTS § 911 comment d (1977); see, eg., Goodpasture, Inc. v. M/V Pollux, 688 F.2d 1003, 1006 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1084 , 103 S.Ct. 1775 , 76 L.Ed.2d 347 (1983).
Freeman
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 82-1376.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 18, 1983.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.