green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
6.3 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 19 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "but see"
Borough of Lansdale v. PP & L, INC.
Co-Op. Inc., 838 F.2d 268, 278-79 (8th Cir.1988) (adopting a Copperweld-in-spired rule that the Robinson-Patman Act did not apply to sales between the electricity utility company and retail distribution electric cooperatives, where the cooperatives jointly owned the utility); but see Zoslaw v. MCA Distributing Corp., 693 F.2d 870 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1085 , 103 S.Ct. 1777 , 76 L.Ed.2d 349 (1983) (in a case decided prior to Copper-weld, finding that transactions between parents and subsidiaries are not immune to Robinson-Patman Act claims).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Gilberto Valle
this court by all means eschews petitio 16 principii
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Monahan's Marine, Inc. v. Boston Whaler, Inc.
in the absence of a horizontal conspiracy to charge different prices or a vertical agreement to exclude 382 competitors, price discrimination does not support a claim under section 1 of the sherman act
discussed
Cited "see"
Luzerne & Lackawanna Supply Co. v. Peerless Industries, Inc.
See Zoslaw v. MCA Distributing Corp., 693 F.2d 870, 878 (9th Cir.1982) 1 , c ert. denied, 460 U.S. 1085 , 103 S.Ct. 1777 , 76 L.Ed.2d 349 (1983); Taggart v. Rutledge, 657 F.Supp. 1420, 1439 (D.Mont.1987), aff'd 852 F.2d 1290 (9th Cir.1988) (distributor with independent pricing, marketing decisions breaks flow of commerce).
discussed
Cited "see"
School District No. 1J, Multnomah County v. ACandS, Inc.
See Zoslaw v. MCA Distributing Corp., 693 F.2d 870, 883 (9th Cir.1982) (“A party may not prevail in opposing a motion for summary judgment by simply overwhelming the district court with a miscellany of unorganized documentation.”), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1085 , 103 S.Ct. 1777 , 76 L.Ed.2d 349 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Dr. Donald J. Barry and Dr. Bert Hassler v. Blue Cross of California
See Zoslaw v. MCA Distributing Corp., 693 F.2d 870, 884 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1085 , 103 S.Ct. 1777 , 76 L.Ed.2d 349 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Richards v. Nielsen Freight Lines
See Zoslaw v. MCA Distributing Corp., 693 F.2d 870, 884 (9th Cir.1982) (quoting ALW, Inc. v. United Air Lines, Inc., 510 F.2d 52, 55 (9th Cir.1975)), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1085 , 103 S.Ct. 1777 , 76 L.Ed.2d 349 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
International Union of Bricklayers & Allied Craftsman Local Union No. 20 v. Martin Jaska, Inc.
See Zoslaw v. MCA Distributing Corp., 693 F.2d 870, 883 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1085 , 103 S.Ct. 1777 , 76 L.Ed.2d 349 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
International Union Of Bricklayers & Allied Craftsman Local Union No. 20, Afl-Cio v. Martin Jaska, Inc.
See Zoslaw v. MCA Distributing Corp., 693 F.2d 870, 883 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1085 , 103 S.Ct. 1777 , 76 L.Ed.2d 349 (1983). 23 Nowhere in the Proposed Pre-Trial Order, in appellants' brief below, or in the course of oral argument, did appellants seek to introduce extrinsic evidence 6 or raise the issue of ambiguity addressed to this court.
discussed
Cited "see"
Airweld, Inc. v. Airco, Inc.
This can be done if the evidence shows “that the defendant sacrificed greater profits or incurred greater losses than necessary in order to eliminate the plaintiff.” Id.; see Zoslaw v. MCA Distributing Corp., 693 F.2d 870, 888 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1085 , 103 S.Ct. 1777 , 76 L.Ed.2d 349 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Zoslaw v. MCA Distributing Corp.
(2×)
See Zoslaw v. Columbia Broadcasting System, 533 F.Supp. 540, 556 (N.D.Cal.1980), aff’d in part and rev’d in part, 693 F.2d 870 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1085 , 103 S.Ct. 1777 , 76 L.Ed.2d 349 (1983); Zoslaw v. MCA Distributing Corp., 693 F.2d 870, 875-76 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1085 , 103 S.Ct. 1777 , 76 L.Ed.2d 349 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Valle
This flawed analysis commits the fallacy of petitio principii (circular reasoning) because “what is to be proved is implicitly presumed as true in the premise.” Black’s Law Dictionary 1329 (10th ed.2014); see also Adams v. Gould, Inc., 687 F.2d 27, 30 (3d Cir.1982) (explaining that “the fallacy of petitio prin-cipii” occurs when one “assum[es] the conclusion”), cer t. denied, 460 U.S. 1085 , 103 S.Ct. 1777 , 76 L.Ed.2d 348 (1983); Nico v. Comm’r of Internal Revenue, 565 F.2d 1234, 1238 (2d Cir.1977) (“this court by all means eschews petitio principii”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wilcox v. First Interstate Bank of Oregon
See also Zoslaw v. MCA Distributing Corp., 693 F.2d 870, 885 (9th Cir.1982) (in absence of agreement, evidence of industry meetings is not sufficient to prove a conspiracy), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1085 , 103 S.Ct. 1777 , 76 L.Ed.2d 349 (1983). 18 We conclude from our review of the record that the bank fully rebutted each plus factor offered by the borrowers.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wilcox v. First Interstate Bank of Oregon, N.A.
See also Zoslaw v. MCA Distributing Corp., 693 F.2d 870, 885 (9th Cir.1982) (in absence of agreement, evidence of industry meetings is not sufficient to prove a conspiracy), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1085 , 103 S.Ct. 1777 , 76 L.Ed.2d 349 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. H. David Miller, United States of America v. Continental Fuel Co., Inc., United States of America v. Don A. Bliesner
See also Zoslaw v. MCA Distributing Corp., 693 F.2d 870, 885 (9th Cir.1982) (evidence of meetings is not sufficient to prove a conspiracy, absent an agreement), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1085 , 103 S.Ct. 1777 , 76 L.Ed.2d 349 (1983).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
ca3 1985
See also Adams v. Gould, Inc., 687 F.2d 27 (3d Cir.1982), cert. denied 460 U.S. 1085 , 103 S.Ct. 1777 , 76 L.Ed.2d 348 (1983).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Delgrosso v. Spang & Co.
See also Adams v. Gould, Inc., 687 F.2d 27 (3d Cir.1982), cert. denied 460 U.S. 1085 , 103 S.Ct. 1777 , 76 L.Ed.2d 348 (1983).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Ralph C. Wilson Industries, Inc. v. American Broadcasting Companies, Inc.
See, e.g., Zoslaw v. MCA Distributing Corp., 693 F.2d 870 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1085 , 103 S.Ct. 1777 , 76 L.Ed.2d 349 (1983); c.f., Ron Tonkin v. Fiat Distrib., 637 F.2d at 1387 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Donald W. Kreuzer, D.M.D. v. American Academy of Periodontology
See, e.g., Zoslaw v. MCA Distributing Corp., 693 F.2d 870 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1085 , 103 S.Ct. 1777 , 76 L.Ed.2d 349 (1983); Bogosian v. Gulf Oil Corp., 561 F.2d 434 (3d Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1086 , 98 S.Ct. 1280 , 55 L.Ed.2d 791 (1978); Venzie Corp. v. United States Mineral Products Co., Inc., 521 F.2d 1309 (3d Cir.1975).
Kondrat
v.
Martinet
v.
Martinet
No. 82-1411.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 18, 1983.
Published
Citer courts: Second Circuit (1) · D. Massachusetts (1)
Ct. App. Ohio, Lake County. Certiorari denied.