green
Positive treatment
5.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 18 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael Anthony Bell
See United States v. McCaskill, 676 F.2d 995, 997 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1018 (1982) 4 See In re Winship, 397 U.S. 358 (1970) (holding that the government must prove beyond a reasonable doubt every element of a charged offense)
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Gregory Payne, United States of America v. Albrane Bruce
See United States v. McCaskill, 676 F.2d 995, 1002 (4th Cir.), cert. denied 459 U.S. 1018 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Kevin James Gibbs, United States of America v. Michael Victor Whatley
See United States v. McCaskill, 676 F.2d 995, 998 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1018 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Leung Tak Lun, Chico Wong, and Andrew Wong
See, United States v. Curtis, 683 F.2d 769 (3rd Cir.1982) (the appellate court held no intent to provoke mistrial, in part because there was no evidence the government feared acquittal), ce rt. denied, 459 U.S. 1018 , 103 S.Ct. 379 , 74 L.Ed.2d 512 (1982).
examined
Cited "see"
United States Ex Rel. Beringer v. O'Grady
(3×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See United States v. Curtis, 683 F.2d 769, 771-72 (3rd Cir.) (finding that an order of remand does not automatically preclude a subsequent finding of double jeopardy), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1018 , 103 S.Ct. 379 , 74 L.Ed.2d 512 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Furst, Sidney D.
See United States v. Curtis, 644 F.2d 263, 267-69 (3d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1018 , 103 S.Ct. 379 , 74 L.Ed.2d 512 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Stanley Friedman, Michael Lazar, Lester Shafran, and Marvin Kaplan, Defendants
See United States v. McCaskill, 676 F.2d 995 , 997 n. 3 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1018 , 103 S.Ct. 381 , 74 L.Ed.2d 513 (1982); cf. United States v. Barash, 412 F.2d 26, 33 (2d Cir.) (failure to object to trial court’s omission of agreed-upon compromise instruction did not preserve claim), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 832 , 90 S.Ct. 86 , 24 L.Ed.2d 82 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jeffrey Grubczak
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
Although our court never has been squarely presented with this precise question, dictum in United States v. Wardy, 777 F.2d 101, 106 (2d Cir.1985), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 1280 , 89 L.Ed.2d 587 (1986), suggests acceptance of the prevailing view that in a prosecution for aiding and abetting armed bank robbery, the government must establish not only that the defendant knew that a bank was to be robbed and became associated and participated in that crime, but also that the defendant " ‘knew that [the principal] was armed and intended to use the weapon, and intended to aid him in that …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. McNair
App. P. 10(b)(1), “when no objection or exception to evidence presented and admitted was made at trial.” State v. Gardner, 315 N.C. 444, 449 , 340 S.E.2d 701, 706 (1986); see also United States v. McCaskill, 676 F.2d 995 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1018 , 74 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Joseph Russell Mikalajunas, Jr.
Rule 52(b) states: 17 Plain errors or defects affecting substantial rights may be noticed although they were not brought to the attention of the court. 18 The rule codified the standard of review previously set forth by the Supreme Court: "In exceptional circumstances, especially in criminal cases, appellate courts, in the public interest, may, of their own motion, notice errors to which no exception has been taken, if the errors are obvious, or if they otherwise seriously affect the fairness, integrity or public reputation of judicial proceedings." United States v. Atkinson, 297 U.S. 157, 160…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Coreas v. United States
See, e.g., United States v. Curtis, 683 F.2d 769, 774 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1018 , 103 S.Ct. 379 , 74 L.Ed.2d 512 (1982); cf. Robinson v. Wade, 686 F.2d 298, 307-09 (5th Cir.1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rogers v. United States
See, e.g., United States v. Curtis, 644 F.2d 263 (3d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1018 , 103 S.Ct. 379 , 74 L.Ed.2d 512 (1982), cited in Wein-stein & Berger, supra, 405-15: [A]n opinion witness can be cross-examined only on matters bearing on his own opinion, while a reputation witness can only be examined on matters reasonably proximate to the time of the alleged offense and likely to have been known to the relevant community at that time. .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Apostle
See also United States v. Curtis, 644 F.2d 263, 268 (3d Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1018 , 103 S. Ct. 379 , 74 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Anthony J. Peters, Lawrence Peters, and Jacek Odoner
See also United States v. Cavale, 688 F.2d 1098, 1107 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1018 , 103 S.Ct. 380 , 75 L.Ed.2d 441 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Samuel M. Chaimson
(2×)
See also United States v. Cavale, 688 F.2d 1098, 1112 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1018 , 103 S.Ct. 380 , 74 L.Ed.2d 513 (1982).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Hyman v. Aiken
See also, United States v. McCaskill, 676 F.2d 995, 999, 1002 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1018 , 103 S.Ct. 381 , 74 L.Ed.2d 513 (1982).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
James Dyral Briley v. Gary L. Bass, Warden
See also United States v. McCaskill, 676 F.2d 995, 1002 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1018 , 103 S.Ct. 381 , 74 L.Ed.2d 513 (1982).
Dean
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 82-625.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 15, 1982.
Cited by 103 opinions | Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.