Laracuente v. Connecticut, 485 U.S. 1036 (1988). · Go Syfert
Search
Laracuente v. Connecticut, 485 U.S. 1036 (1988). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
193 citation events (91 in the last 25 years) across 12 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Streater (ncctapp, 2009-07-07)
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989 2007 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 17 distinct citers.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Streater
N.C. Ct. App. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Bagley, 321 N.C. 201, 213 , 362 S.E.2d 244, 251 (1987) (explaining that “plain error” is error “so fundamental as to amount to a miscarriage of justice or which probably resulted in the jury reaching a different verdict than it otherwise would have reached”), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 1036 , 99 L.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Maready (2×)
N.C. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Hammett, 361 N.C. 92, 98 , 637 S.E.2d 518, 522 (2006) (appellate court reviewing evidentiary admissions for plain error must ask "whether the jury would probably have reached a different verdict if [the challenged evidence] had not been admitted") (citing State v. Bagley, 321 N.C. 201, 213 , 362 S.E.2d 244, 251 (1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 1036 , 108 S.Ct. 1598 , 99 L.Ed.2d 912 (1988)).
cited Cited "see" Boileau v. Seagrave
N.C. Ct. App. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Bagley, 321 N.C. 201 , 362 S.E.2d 244 (1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 1036 , 99 L.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Ridgeway
N.C. Ct. App. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Bagley, 321 N.C. 201, 213 , 362 S.E.2d 244, 251 (1987) (explaining that “plain error” is error “so fundamental as to amount to a miscarriage of justice or which probably resulted in the jury reaching a different verdict than it otherwise would have reached”), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 1036 , 99 L.
discussed Cited "see" Woods v. Zeluff
Utah Ct. App. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Branch, 743 P.2d 1187, 1190 (Utah 1987) ("Rule 403 is not to be used to allow the trial judge to substitute his assessment of the credibility of testimony for that of the jury by excluding testimony simply because he does not find it credible."), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 1036 , 108 S.Ct. 1597 , 99 L.Ed.2d 911 (1988). 4 .
discussed Cited "see" State v. Hammett
N.C. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Bagley, 321 N.C. 201, 213 , 362 S.E.2d 244, 251 (1987) (explaining that “plain error” is error “so fundamental as to amount to a miscarriage of justice or which probably resulted in the jury reaching a different verdict than it otherwise would have reached”), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 1036 , 99 L.
cited Cited "see" State v. Riley
N.C. Ct. App. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Bagley, 321 N.C. 201 , 362 S.E.2d 244 [(1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 1036 , 99 L.
cited Cited "see" State v. Smith
Conn. App. Ct. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Laracuente, 205 Conn. 515, 521-23 , 534 A.2d 882 (1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 1036 , 108 S. Ct. 1598 , 99 L.
cited Cited "see" Guida v. Commissioner of Correction
Conn. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Laracuente, 205 Conn. 515, 520 , 534 A.2d 882 (1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 1036 , 108 S. Ct. 1598 , 99 L.
discussed Cited "see" State v. White
N.C. Ct. App. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Bagley, 321 N.C. 201 , 362 S.E.2d 244 (1987), cert. denied, Bagley v. North Carolina, 485 U.S. 1036 , 108 S. Ct. 1598 (1988) (evidence of subsequent offense not admissible to prove identity where identity is not at issue); State v. Thomas, 310 N.C. 369 , 312 S.E.2d 458 (1984) (identity put in issue, as required, where defendant relied upon alibi defense); State v. McKoy, 78 N.C.
cited Cited "see" In re John C.
Conn. App. Ct. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Laracuente, 205 Conn. 515, 521-22 , 534 A.2d 882 , cert. denied, 485 U.S. 1036 , 108 S. Ct. 1598 , 99 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Peluso
Conn. · 2022 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Laracuente, 205 Conn. 515, 519 , 534 A.2d 882 (1987) (‘‘[t]he state does not have a duty . . . to disclose infor- mation which the state does not have’’ (internal quota- tion marks omitted)), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 1036 , 108 S. Ct. 1598 , 99 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Williams (2×)
N.C. Ct. App. · 2017 · signal: see also · confidence low
State v. Coffey, 326 N.C. 268 , 278–79, 389 S.E.2d 48, 54 (1990); see also State v. White, 340 N.C. 264, 284 , 457 S.E.2d 841 , 852–53 (1995) (“The list of permissible purposes for admission of ‘other crimes’ evidence is not exclusive, and such evidence is admissible as long as it is relevant to any fact or issue other than the defendant’s propensity to commit the crime.” (citing State v. Bagley, 321 N.C. 201 , 362 S.E.2d 244 (1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 1036 (1988))).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Morgan
N.C. · 2004 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also State v. Bagley, 321 N.C. 201 , 206, 362 S.E.2d 244 , 247 (1987) (even though testimony was inadmissible to show identity of the perpetrator, it was admissible for other purposes provided in Rule 404(b)), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 1036 , 99 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Morgan
N.C. · 2004 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also State v. Bagley, *159 321 N.C. 201, 206 , 362 S.E.2d 244, 247 (1987) (even though testimony was inadmissible to show identity of the perpetrator, it was admissible for other purposes provided in Rule 404(b)), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 1036 , 99 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Hedgepeth
N.C. Ct. App. · 2004 · signal: see also · confidence low
State v. Weaver, 306 N.C. 629, 636-37 , 295 S.E.2d 375, 378-79 (1982), overruled on other grounds by State v. Collins, 334 N.C. 54 , 431 S.E.2d 188 (1993); see also State v. Bagley, 321 N.C. 201 , 362 S.E.2d 244 (1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 1036 , 99 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Barry G. Rattigan
6th Cir. · 1993 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Morris v. Doan, 829 F.2d 39 (Text in WESTLAW at 3) (6th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 1036 (1988). 17 Before this court, Rattigan makes no attempt to establish the elements of his prima facie case; instead, he argues that because there was only one black member out of 40-member panel, the burden shifted to the government to show that the district court's procedure for selecting jurors is constitutional.
Laracuente
v.
Connecticut
No. 87-6577.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 2, 1988.
485 U.S. 1036
Published

Sup. Ct. Conn. Certiorari denied.