green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
7.6 score
“there can be no doubt the sentencing judge may consider . . . whether the defendant is contrite”
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 28 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Commonwealth v. Jones
there can be no doubt the sentencing judge may consider . . . whether the defendant is contrite
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gray
See United States v. Vaccaro, 816 F.2d 443 (9th Cir.1987), ce rt. denied, 484 U.S. 928 , 108 S.Ct. 295 , 98 L.Ed.2d 255 (1987), abrogated on other grounds, Huddleston v. United States, 485 U.S. 681 , 108 S.Ct. 1496 , 99 L.Ed.2d 771 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Denise Sanders, Yolanda Whatley, and Wanda Walker v. Venture Stores, Inc.
See In the Matter of Energy Cooperative, Inc., 814 F.2d 1226, 1230-31 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 928 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Diana Hernandez
See United States v. Vaccaro, 816 F.2d 443, 452 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 914 , and cert. denied, 484 U.S. 928 (1987); Brulay v. United States, 383 F.2d 345, 347 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 986 (1967).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Richard Heuer, United States of America v. Eugene Holderness
(2×)
See United States v. Vacarro, 816 F.2d 443, 449-50 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 928 , 108 S.Ct. 295 , 98 L.Ed.2d 255 (1987). 39 Heuer failed to renew his motion for severance after it became clear that a substantial portion of the evidence at trial was directed at Holderness.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Carlos Quintanilla and Leticia Gutierrez
See United States v. Lennon, 814 F.2d 185, 190 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 928 , 108 5.
cited
Cited "see"
Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. Plymouth Concrete, Inc.
See In re Energy Coop., Inc., 814 F.2d 1226, 1230-31 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 928 , 108 S.Ct. 294 , 98 L.Ed.2d 254 (1987); Car Carriers, 789 F.2d at 593 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Damaso Vasquez, A/K/A Tiny, Julio Abreu, A/K/A Blackie, Carlos Arroyo, and Hardy Rivera, A/K/A Billy, A/K/A Ariel Rivera
See United States v. Sato, 814 F.2d 449, 452 (7th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 928 , 108 S.Ct. 294 , 98 L.Ed.2d 254 (1987); United States v. Marquardt, 786 F.2d 771, 781 (7th Cir.1986).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Vasquez
See United States v. Sato, 814 F.2d 449, 452 (7th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 928 , 108 S.Ct. 294 , 98 L.Ed.2d 254 (1987); United States v. Marquardt, 786 F.2d 771, 781 (7th Cir.1986).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jerry P. Ramusack
See United States v. Sato, 814 F.2d 449, 452 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 928 , 108 S.Ct. 294 , 98 L.Ed.2d 254 (1987) (upholding $20,000 fine for tax fraud).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Oscar Smith, Regina Smith and Gary King, Julia Thom
United States v. Johnson, 713 F.2d 633, 640 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1081 , 104 S.Ct. 1447 , 79 L.Ed.2d 766 (1984); see United States v. LaChance, 817 F.2d 1491, 1497 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 928 , 108 S.Ct. 295 , 98 L.Ed.2d 255 (1987) (A defendant complaining that he was disadvantaged by a joint trial specifically “must show compelling prejudice caused by the alleged evidentiary spillover, which effectively precluded the jury’s ability to make the necessary individualized determination.”).
discussed
Cited "see"
La Preferida, Inc., an Illinois Corporation v. Cerveceria Modelo, S.A. De C v. a Mexican Corporation
When “the prior action was brought in federal court, federal rules of res judicata apply.” Barnett v. Stern, 909 F.2d 973, 977 (7th Cir.1990); see Matter of Energy Coop., Inc., 814 F.2d 1226, 1230 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 928 , 108 S.Ct. 294 , 98 L.Ed.2d 254 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. George Humberto Bosch, Sr.
See United States v. Vaccaro, 816 F.2d 443, 455 (9th Cir.) (failure to challenge search of defendant’s house was not ineffective assistance of counsel where defendant failed to show that the evidence gained thereby would have been suppressed, or that there was a reasonable probability that he would have been acquitted had this evidence been excluded), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 928 , 108 S.Ct. 295 , 98 L.Ed.2d 255 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Virgil Winters
See United States v. Sato, 814 F.2d 449, 451 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 928 (1987). 4 At the sentencing hearing, Winters challenged the probation officer's calculation in the presentence report regarding the offender characteristic level.
cited
Cited "see"
Caputo v. National Ass'n of Letter Carriers
See Smegal v. Gateway Foods of Minneapolis, 763 F.2d 354 , 360 (8th Cir.1985), cert denied, 484 U.S. 928 , 108 S.Ct. 293 , 98 L.Ed.2d 253 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Com. v. Alston, R.
See also Commonwealth v. Wallace, 522 Pa. 297, 315 , 561 A.2d 719, 728 (1989) (citing Commonwealth v. Nelson, . 514 Pa. 262, 271, n. 3 , 523 A.2d 728, 733, n. 3 (1987), . cert. denied, 484 US 928 , 108 S.Ct. 293 , 98 L.Ed.2d 253 (1987) (under ordinary circumstances, an appellate tribunal should not entertain a challenge to the weight of the evidence since their examination is confined to the "cold record")).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pearson v. Ly
See also, Commonwealth v. Wallace, 522 Pa. 297, 315 , 561 A.2d 719, 728 (1989) citing Commonwealth v. Nelson, 514 Pa. 262 , 271 n.3, 523 A.2d 728 , 733 n.3 (1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 928 , 108 S.Ct. 293 , 98 L.Ed.2d 253 (1987) (under ordinary circumstances, an appellate tribunal should not entertain a challenge to the weight of the evidence since their examination is confined to the “cold record”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Marathon Ashland Petroleum, LLC v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters
Id. at 264 ; see also Smegal v. Gateway Foods of Minneapolis, Inc., 819 F.2d 191, 193 (8th Cir.) (“major test for a successor employer is whether there is substantial continuity between the new operation and the old, particularly with regard to the employees”), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 928 , 108 S.Ct. 293 , 98 L.Ed.2d 253 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Marathon Ashland Petroleum, Llc. v. International Brotherhood Of Teamsters
Id. at 264 ; see also Smegal v. Gateway Foods of Minneapolis, Inc., 819 F.2d 191, 193 (8th Cir.) ("major test for a successor employer is whether there is substantial continuity between the new operation and the old, particularly with regard to the employees"), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 928 , 108 S.Ct. 293 , 98 L.Ed.2d 253 (1987). 11 After reviewing the relevant Supreme Court cases on successorship liability, Fall River Dyeing & Finishing Corp. v. NLRB, 482 U.S. 27 , 107 S.Ct. 2225 , 96 L.Ed.2d 22 (1987); Howard Johnson, 417 U.S. at 249 ; NLRB v. Burns Int'l Sec.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Gribble
Commonwealth v. Marshall, 534 Pa. 488 , 633 A.2d 1100 (1993) (hammer blows to body of young girl were sufficient to demonstrate specific intent to kill); Commonwealth v. Goins, 508 Pa. 270 , 495 A.2d 527 (1985) (approximately twenty-five hammer blows to the head supported finding of specific intent to kill); see also Commonwealth v. Nelson, 514 Pa. 262 , 523 A.2d 728 , cert. denied, 484 U.S. 928 , 108 S.Ct. 293 , 98 L.Ed.2d 253 (1987) (striking the head with a hammer, stabbing the chest with a chisel, and strangling the neck with an electric cord showed specific intent to kill).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Young
See also Commonwealth v. Wallace, 522 Pa. 297, 315 , 561 A.2d 719, 728 (1989) (citing Commonwealth v. Nelson, 514 Pa. 262, 271, n. 3 , 523 A.2d 728, 733, n. 3 (1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 928 , 108 S.Ct. 293 , 98 L.Ed.2d 253 (1987)(under ordinary circumstances, an appellate tribunal should not entertain a challenge to the weight of the evidence since their examination is confined to the “cold record”)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Griffin
See also Commonwealth v. Wallace, 522 Pa. 297, 315 , 561 A.2d 719, 728 (1989) (citing Commonwealth v. Nelson, 514 Pa. 262, 271, n. 3 , 523 A.2d 728, 733, n. 3 (1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 928 , 108 S.Ct. 293 , 98 L.Ed.2d 253 (1987) (under ordinary circumstances, an appellate tribunal should not entertain a challenge to the weight of the evidence since their examination is confined to the “cold record”)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Molino v. DuBois
See, e.g., United States v. LaChance, 817 F.2d 1491, 1498 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 928 , 108 S.Ct. 295 , 98 L.Ed.2d 255 (1987); Locks v. Sumner, 703 F.2d 403, 407-08 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 933 , 104 S.Ct 338 , 78 L.Ed.2d 307 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Weatherspoon
(2×)
State v. Scott, 493 N.W.2d 546, 549 (Minn.1992); see also United States v. Vaccaro, 816 F.2d 443, 457 (9th Cir.1987) (prospective juror's brother's robbery conviction sufficiently race-neutral), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 928 , 108 S.Ct. 295 , 98 L.Ed.2d 255 (1987); People v. Hooper, 133 Ill.2d 469 , 142 Ill.Dec. 93, 109 , 552 N.E.2d 684, 700 (Ill.1989) (same), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 911 , 111 S.Ct. 284 , 112 L.Ed.2d 239 (1990).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Jane Doe v. Allied-Signal, Inc.
See, e.g., Matter of Energy Co-op., Inc., 814 F.2d 1226 , 1231 n. 6 (7th Cir.1987), certiorari denied, 484 U.S. 928 , 108 S.Ct. 294 , 98 L.Ed.2d 254 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
McCray v. State
See also United States v. Vaccaro , 816 F.2d 443 (9th Cir.), cert. denied , 484 U.S. 928 , 108 S.Ct. 295 , 98 L.Ed.2d 255 (1987) (juror had poor attitude when answering voir dire questioning); McGahee v. State , 554 So.2d 454 (Ala.Crim.App.), aff'd , 554 So.2d 473 (Ala. 1989). (juror's statement that she did not want to serve on jury was a legitimate, non-discriminatory reason for jury strike). "[A] prosecutor may use peremptory challenges when he cannot formulate and sustain a legal objection to a juror, and yet has reason to question the impartiality of the juror due to his habits and associ…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Rochon
See also Commonwealth v. Wallace, 522 Pa. 297, 315 , 561 A.2d 719, 728 (1989) (citing Commonwealth v. Nelson, 514 Pa. 262, 271, n. 3 , 523 A.2d 728, 733, n. 3 (1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 928 , 108 S.Ct. 293 , 98 L.Ed.2d 253 (1987) (under ordinary circumstances, an appellate tribunal should not entertain a challenge to the weight of the evidence since their examination is confined to the “cold record”)).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Gonzalez v. State
See also United States v. Vaccaro, 816 F.2d 443 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 928 , 108 S.Ct. 295 , 98 L.Ed.2d 255 (1987).
LaChance
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 87-528.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 2, 1987.
484 U.S. 928
Published
Citer courts: Massachusetts Appeals Court (1)
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.