green
Positive treatment
8.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1990
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 30 distinct citers.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Miller
See United States v. Nesbitt, 852 F.2d 1502, 1512 (7th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1015 , 109 S.Ct. 808 , 102 L.Ed.2d 798 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Kenneth Allen v. Charles B. Miller
See United States v. Nesbitt, 852 F.2d 1502, 1515-16 (7th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1015 (1988) (explaining the tolling of the 180 day period when defendant caused delay).
discussed
Cited "see"
Robert Rothrock v. United States
See United States v. Nesbitt, 852 F.2d 1502, 1514-15 (7th Cir.1988) (applying "reasonable promptness" standard to district court resolution of pre-trial motions raising complex issues in the context of an 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (h)(1)(F) exclusion), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1015 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Diaz-Martinez
See ___ -17- 17 United States v. Buckley, 847 F.2d 991 , 993 n.1 (1st Cir. _____________ _______ 1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1015 (1989); United States v. ____________ ______________ Gordon, 634 F.2d 638, 638-39 (1st Cir. 1990) ("[I]n the ______ absence of extraordinary circumstances, the orderly administration of criminal justice precludes a district court from considering a 2255 motion while review of the direct appeal is still pending . . . ." (internal quotation marks and citations omitted)).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Diaz-Martinez
See United States v. Buckley, 847 F.2d 991 , 993 n. 1 (1st Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1015 , 109 S.Ct. 808 , 102 L.Ed.2d 798 (1989); United States v. Gordon, 634 F.2d 638, 638-39 (1st Cir.1980) (“[I]n the absence of extraordinary circumstances, the orderly administration of criminal justice precludes a district court from considering a § 2255 motion while review of the direct appeal is still pending_” (internal quotation marks and citations omitted)).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Martinez Molina
See United States v. Buckley, 847 F.2d 991 , 1000 n. 6 (1st Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1015 , 109 S.Ct. 808 , 102 L.Ed.2d 798 (1989); Daniels, 821 F.2d at 79-80 ; see also Caro, 997 F.2d at 660 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Martinez Molina
See United States v. Buckley, 847 F.2d 991 , ___ ______________ _______ 1000 n.6 (1st Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1015 (1989); ____________ Daniels, 821 F.2d at 79-80 ; see also Caro, 997 F.2d at 60. _______ ________ ____ Here, it is clear from the record that the district court was fully aware of the package nature of the defendants' plea agreements.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Luciano Mosquera
See United States v. Buckley, 847 F.2d 991 , 993 n. 1, 1000 n. 6 (1st Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1015 , 109 S.Ct. 808 , 102 L.Ed.2d 798 (1989); see also Rule 5, Rules Governing Proceedings in the United States District Courts Under Section 2255 of Title 28, United States Code, advisory committee note (1976). 10 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Pava Buelba
See United States v. Buckley, 847 F.2d 991 , 993 n.1, ___ ________________________ 1000 n.6 (1st Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1015 (1989); ____________ see also Rule 5, Rules Governing Proceedings in the United ________ States District Courts Under Section 2255 of Title 28, United States Code, advisory committee note (1976). -42- 42 There was no prejudice.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Devaney
See United ___ ______ States v. Buckley, 847 F.2d 991 , 993 n.1 (1st Cir. 1988) ______ _______ (allowing motion to consolidate a motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence with pending direct appeal), cert. ____ denied, 488 U.S. 1015 (1989); United States v. Connell, 6 ______ ______________ _______ F.3d 27, 29 (1st Cir. 1993) (despite jurisdictional doubts, appellate court entitled to affirm dismissal on the ground that no substantial question is presented on the merits).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Devaney
See United States v. Buckley, 847 F.2d 991 , 993 n.1 (1st Cir. 1988) (allowing motion to consolidate a motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence with pending direct appeal), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1015 (1989); United States v. Connell, 6 F.3d 27, 29 (1st Cir. 1993) (despite jurisdictional doubts, appellate court entitled to affirm dismissal on the ground that no substantial question is presented on the merits). 2 We have reviewed carefully the record in this case and the briefs of the parties.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Parrilla Tirado
See United States v. Buckley, 847 F.2d 991, 998 (1st Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1015 , 109 S.Ct. 808 , 102 L.Ed.2d 798 (1989); United States v. Kobrosky, 711 F.2d 449, 454 (1st Cir.1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Parrilla Tirado
See ___ United States v. Buckley, 847 F.2d 991, 998 (1st Cir. 1988), ______________ _______ cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1015 (1989); United States v. Kobrosky, _____ ______ ______________ ________ 711 F.2d 449, 454 (1st Cir. 1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jimmie Terrell v. Salvador A. Godinez, and Roland W. Burris
See United States v. Nesbitt, 852 F.2d 1502, 1522 (7th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1015 (1989); United States v. Ely, 719 F.2d 902, 907 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1037 (1984); United States ex rel.
discussed
Cited "see"
David Williams v. United States
See United States v. Buckley, 847 F.2d 991, 999 (1st Cir. 1988)("The district court's adherence to Rule 11 does not, to be sure, insulate from review its conclusion that the plea was valid."), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1015 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Williams v. United States of
See United States v. Buckley, 847 F.2d 991, 999 (1st Cir. ___ ______________ _______ 1988)("The district court's adherence to Rule 11 does not, to be sure, insulate from review its conclusion that the plea was valid."), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1015 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sadowski v. McCormick
See, United States v. Nesbitt, 852 F.2d 1502, 1520-21 (7th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1015 , 109 S.Ct. 808 , 102 L.Ed.2d 798 (1989); Miller, 868 F.2d 1120 -21. 3 In his direct appeal, Sadowski alleged the decision of the investigating law enforcement officers not to gather and fingerprint the various tools in the immediate proximity of the shooting was a conscious decision.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Christian Lopez
See United States v. Perez-Franco, 873 F.2d 455, 460 (1st Cir.1989). 1 A plea agreement entailing lenity to a third party “imposes a special responsibility on the district court to ascertain [the] plea’s voluntariness,” United States v. Buckley, 847 F.2d 991 , 1000 n. 6 (1st Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1015 , 109 S.Ct. 808 , 102 L.Ed.2d 798 (1989); see also United States v. Daniels, 821 F.2d 76, 80 (1st Cir.1987), due to its coercive potential.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Shields
See United States v. Nesbitt, 852 F.2d 1502, 1509 (7th Cir.1988) (conspiracy may be proven by circumstantial evidence, including the relationship of the parties), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1015 , 109 S.Ct. 808 , 102 L.Ed.2d 798 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Lechuga
See United States v. Nesbitt, 852 F.2d 1502, 1509 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1015 , 109 S.Ct. 808 , 102 L.Ed.2d 798 (1988); United States v. Pritchard, 745 F.2d 1112, 1122 (7th Cir.1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Engelmann
(2×)
See also, U.S. v. Buckley, 847 F.2d 991 (1st Cir.1988)(cannot withdraw Alford pleas willy-nilly), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1015 , 109 S.Ct. 808 , 102 L.Ed.2d 798 (1989).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Raineri
See, e.g., United States v. Buckley, 847 F.2d 991, 998 (1st Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1015 , 109 S.Ct. 808 , 102 L.Ed.2d 798 (1989).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Raineri
See, e.g., United States v. Buckley, 847 ___ ____ _____________ _______ F.2d 991, 998 (1st Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1015 ____________ (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Piper
See, e.g., United States v. Buckley, 847 F.2d 991, 999 (1st Cir.1988) (explaining need for court to respond appropriately to defendant’s questions at ehange-of-plea hearing), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1015 , 109 S.Ct. 808 , 102 L.Ed.2d 798 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Piper
See, e.g., United States v. Buckley, 847 F.2d 991 , ___ ____ _____________ _______ 999 (1st Cir. 1988) (explaining need for court to respond appropriately to defendant's questions at change-of-plea hearing), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1015 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Frank O. Becker
“We are unwilling to impute to Congress a purpose, nowhere stated or even hinted at by it, to require a judge to decide a collection of pretrial motions within 30 days, no matter how many there are.” United States v. Tibboel, 753 F.2d 608, 612 (7th Cir.1985); see also United States v. Nesbitt, 852 F.2d 1502, 1514 (7th Cir.1988), certiorari denied, 488 U.S. 1015 , 109 S.Ct. 808 , 102 L.Ed.2d 798 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. William Scott Blythe
See also United States v. Nesbitt, 852 F.2d 1502, 1521 (7th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1015 , 109 S.Ct. 808 , 102 L.Ed.2d 798 (1989).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Sarette
Saft, supra at 1083 ; see also United States v. Buckley, 847 F.2d 991 , 998 n.5 (1st Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1015 (1989); United States v. Ramos, 810 F.2d at 313 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Rodriguez
See also United States v. Buckley, 847 F.2d 991 (1st Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1015 , 109 S.Ct. 808 , 102 L.Ed.2d 798 (1989); United States v. Read, 778 F.2d 1437 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 835 , 107 S.Ct. 131 , 93 L.Ed.2d 75 (1986); and United States v. Kobrosky, 711 F.2d 449 (1st Cir.1983).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Pollard
See also United States v. *807 Buckley, 847 F.2d 991, 1003 (1st Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1015 , 109 S.Ct. 808 , 102 L.Ed.2d 798 (1989).
Lightsey
v.
Kastner, Warden
v.
Kastner, Warden
No. 88-5862.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 9, 1989.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.