green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
7.1 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 18 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Stanberry v. State
police may seek the voluntary cooperation of citizens in law enforcement activities without implicating the fourth amendment.
discussed
Cited "see"
Leidel v. AMERIPRIDE SERVICES, INC.
See United States v. Bedonie, 913 F.2d 782 , *1251 801-802 (10th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1253 , 111 S.Ct. 2895 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1059 (1991) (Rule 608(a) is subject to the Rule 403 balancing test). 36 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ricky Carter
See United States v. Bedonie, 913 F.2d 782, 794 (10th Cir.1990) 25 ("Section 1867(e) 26 'provides the exclusive means for a party charged with a 27 federal crime to challenge a jury.' ") (quoting United States v. Cooper, 733 F.2d 1360, 1366 (10th Cir.) 28 , cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1255 , 104 S.Ct. 3543 , 82 L.Ed.2d 847 (1984) 29 ), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1253 (1991). 30 In criminal cases, § 1867 requires a party challenging the jury selection process to make his challenge by motion "before the voir dire examination begins, or within seven days after the defendant discovered or could have disco…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Carter
See United States v. Bedonie, 913 F.2d 782, 794 (10th Cir.1990) (“Section 1867(e) ‘provides the exclusive means for a party charged with a federal crime to challenge a jury.’”) (quoting United States v. Cooper, 733 F.2d 1360, 1366 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1255 (1984)), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1253 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ortiz
See United States v. Bedonie, 913 F.2d 782, 794 (10th Cir. 1990) (“Section 1867(e) ‘provides the exclusive means for a party charged with a federal crime to challenge a jury.’”) (quoting United States v. Cooper, 733 F.2d 1360, 1366 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1255 (1984)), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1253 -5- (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Daniel L. Ortiz
See United States v. Bedonie, 913 F.2d 782, 794 (10th Cir.1990) ("Section 1867(e) 'provides the exclusive means for a party charged with a federal crime to challenge a jury.' ") (quoting United States v. Cooper, 733 F.2d 1360, 1366 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1255 (1984)), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1253 (1991). 16 Section 1867(a) requires a party challenging the jury selection process to make his challenge by motion "before the voir dire examination begins, or within seven days after the defendant discovered or could have discovered, by the exercise of diligence, the grounds therefor, whi…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Carlos Tyrone Henderson
See United States v. Flowers, 912 F.2d 707, 712 (4th Cir.1990) (seizure cannot occur in the absence of threats, offensive contact, or similar circumstances), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1253 (1991). 13 In addition, Piner's retention of Henderson's license did not amount to a seizure.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Henderson
See United States v. Flowers, 912 F.2d 707, 712 (4th Cir. 1990) (seizure cannot occur in the absence of threats, offensive contact, or similar circum- stances), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1253 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ulysses Tines (94-5920), Glynn Bridgeforth (94-5923), and Belinda Marshall (94-5926)
See Sawyers, 902 F.2d at 1220 (holding court within its discretion to give Allen charge when jury announced a deadlock after three hours of deliberation), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1253 , 111 S.Ct. 2895 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1059 (1991); United States v. Clark, 988 F.2d 1459, 1469 (6th Cir.) (holding Allen charge appropriate when given 50 minutes after jury announced a deadlock two days into deliberations), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 105 , 126 L.Ed.2d 71 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
Robert TURNER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Charles D. MARSHALL, Warden, Respondent-Appellee
See Pitts v. Lockhart, 911 F.2d 109, 112 (8th Cir.1990) (holding that a case in which the death penalty was sought but not imposed is a noncapital case), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1253 , 111 S.Ct. 2896 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1060 (1991); Rembert v. Dugger, 842 F.2d 301, 303 (11th Cir.) (holding that Beck applies when the defendant faces the possibility of the death penalty), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 969 , 109 S.Ct. 500 , 102 L.Ed.2d 536 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Vachon
See United States v. Bedonie, 913 F.2d 782, 802 (10th Cir. 1990), cert. denied,, 501 U.S. 1253 (1991); State v. Mazerolle, 614 A.2d 68, 73 (Me. 1992); State v. Land, 851 P.2d 678, 681 (Wash. 1993); see generally Kelly, 312 A.2d at 908 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jasmine Phillips, United States of America v. Derek Warren Shaw
See United States v. Flowers, 912 F.2d 707 (4th Cir.1990) (bus encounter involving similar circumstances held valid), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1253 (1991).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Bowles v. Berge
See, e.g., Pitts v. Lockhart, 911 F.2d 109 (8th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1253 , 111 S.Ct. 2896 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1060 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Terrance Drake v. Superintendent, Trumbull Correctional Institution
See, e.g., Pitts v. Lockhart, 911 F.2d 109 (8th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1253 (1991); Trujillo v. Sullivan, 815 F.2d 597 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 929 (1987); Rembert v. Dugger, 842 F.2d 301 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 969 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Edmonds
Bostick, 501 U.S. at 434 , 111 S.Ct. at 2386 (quoting California v. Hodari, 499 U.S. 621, 625 , 111 S.Ct. 1547, 1550 , 113 L.Ed.2d 690 (1991)); see also United States v. Flowers, 912 F.2d 707, 712 (4th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1253 , 111 S.Ct. 2895 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1060 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hanson v. Putnam County Com'n
Abel v. United States, 362 U.S. 217, 241 (1960); see also United States v. Flowers, 912 F.2d 707, 711 (4th Cir.1990) (explaining no rights violated by officer's search of bag where defendant expressly denied ownership), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1253 (1991); United States v. Jackson, 544 F.2d 407, 409 (9th Cir.1976) (noting voluntary abandonment deprives individual of standing to challenge subsequent search and seizure).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hanson v. Putnam County Commis
Abel v. United States, 362 U.S. 217, 241 (1960); see also United States v. Flowers, 912 F.2d 707, 711 (4th Cir. 1990) (explain- ing no rights violated by officer's search of bag where defendant expressly denied ownership), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1253 (1991); United States v. Jackson, 544 F.2d 407, 409 (9th Cir. 1976) (noting voluntary abandonment deprives individual of standing to challenge subsequent search and seizure).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Percy Lewis and Maswep Enterprises, Inc. v. McDonald Corporation
B. 17 Next, the plaintiffs argue that the district court abused its discretion in denying their motion for a continuance of the trial date. 18 "A trial judge enjoys great discretion in ruling on a motion for a continuance," and a court of appeals reviews the district court's decision only to determine "whether the judge 'clearly abused' his discretion." United States v. Poston, 902 F.2d 90, 96 (D.C.Cir.1990) (citation omitted); see also United States v. Sawyers, 902 F.2d 1217, 1219 (6th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1253 (1991).
Allen
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 90-7204.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 28, 1991.
501 U.S. 1253
Published
Citer courts: Court of Special Appeals of Ma… (1)
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.