green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.3 score
“fleet factors ii”
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 24 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Fleet Factors Corp.
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
fleet factors ii
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Oscarson
See State v. Swan, 114 Wash.2d 613 , 790 P.2d 610, 620 (1990) (en banc) (collecting cases) (accurate description by three-year-old children of fellatio, intercourse, and ejaculation demonstrated precocious sexual knowledge and is corroborative of sexual abuse), cert. denied, Swan v. Washington, 498 U.S. 1046 , 111 S.Ct. 752 , 112 L.Ed.2d 772 (1991); State v. McCafferty, 356 N.W.2d 159, 164 (S.D.1984) (collecting cases) ("A young child is unlikely to fabricate a graphic account of sexual activity because such activity is beyond the realm of his or her experience."). *350 ¶ 39.
discussed
Cited "see"
ca8 1997
See State v. Swan, 114 Wash.2d 613 , 790 P.2d 610, 632 (1990) (en banc), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1046 , 111 S.Ct. 752 , 112 L.Ed.2d 772 (1991); State v. Erickson, 454 N.W.2d 624, 627-29 (Minn.App.1990) 12 When the first child witness (the nine-year-old male cousin) froze on the stand in open court, the district court, consistent with numerous Eighth Circuit cases, ruled that leading questions could be asked of reticent child witnesses.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Desmond Rouse
See State v. Swan, 114 Wash.2d 613 , 790 P.2d 610, 632 (1990) (en banc), cert. denied, 49§ U.S. 1046, 111 S.Ct. 752 , 112 L.Ed.2d 772 (1991); State v. Erickson, 454 N.W.2d 624, 627-29 (Minn.App.1990). .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Desmond Rouse
See State v. Swan, 114 Wash.2d 613 , 790 P.2d 610, 632 (1990) (en banc), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1046 , 111 S.Ct. 752 , 112 L.Ed.2d 772 (1991); State v. Erickson, 454 N.W.2d 624, 627-29 (Minn.App.1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. MacOn
See State v. Swan, 114 Wash.2d 613 , 790 P.2d 610 (1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1046 , 111 S.Ct. 752 , 112 L.Ed.2d 772 (1991), and denial of habeus corpus aff'd, 6 F.3d 1373 (9th Cir.1993), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 115 S.Ct. 479 , 130 L.Ed.2d 393 (1994). [8] RPIV at 36-37.
discussed
Cited "see"
Bancamerica Commercial Corp. v. Trinity Industries, Inc.
See United States v. Fleet Factors Corp., 901 F.2d 1550, 1556 (11th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1046 , 111 S.Ct. 752 , 112 L.Ed.2d 772 (1991); United States v. Maryland Bank & Trust Co., 632 F.Supp. 573, 578 (D.Md.1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Redwing Carriers, Inc. v. Saraland Apartments, Ltd.
THE STATUTE CERCLA authorizes suit against: (1) the owner and operator of a vessel or a facility, - (2) any person who at the time of disposal of any hazardous substance owned or operated any facility at which such hazardous substances were disposed of, (3) any person who by contract, agreement, or otherwise arranged for disposal or treatment, or arranged with a transporter for transport for disposal or treatment, of hazardous substances owned or possessed by such person, by any other party or entity, at any facility or incineration vessel owned or operated by another party or entity and conta…
discussed
Cited "see"
Kemp Industries, Inc. v. Safety Light Corp.
See United States v. Fleet Factors Corp., 901 F.2d 1550, 1556 (11th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1046 , 111 S.Ct. 752 , 112 L.Ed.2d 772 (1991); United States v. Maryland Bank & Trust Co., 632 F.Supp. 573, 578 (D.Md.1986); see also United States v. First City National Bank of Houston, 386 U.S. 361, 366 , 87 S.Ct. 1088, 1092 , 18 L.Ed.2d 151 (1967) (“That is the general rule where one claims the benefits of an exception to the prohibition of a statute.”).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Fleet Factors Corp.
See United States v. Fleet Factors Corp., 724 F.Supp. 955 (S.D.Ga.1988) (granting summary judgment against Horowitz and Newton as to liability), aff'd and aff'd on other grounds, 901 F.2d 1550 (11th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1046 , 111 S.Ct. 752 , 112 L.Ed.2d 772 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Amtreco, Inc.
See United States v. Fleet Factors Corp., 901 F.2d 1550, 1553 (11th Cir.1990), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 111 S.Ct. 752 , 112 L.Ed.2d 772 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Adkinson v. International Harvester Co.
See United States v. Fleet Factors Corp., 901 F.2d 1550 , 1554 n. 2 (11th Cir.1990), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 752 , 112 L.Ed.2d 772 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation v. Catellus Development Corporation
See United States v. Fleet Factors Corp., 901 F.2d 1550, 1554 (11th Cir.1990) (liability under section 9607(a)(1) only attaches to the present owner or operator of a facility), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 111 S.Ct. 752 , 112 L.Ed.2d 772 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. v. Catellus Development Corp.
See United States v. Fleet Factors Corp., 901 F.2d 1550, 1554 (11th Cir.1990) (liability under section 9607(a)(1) only attaches to the present owner or operator of a facility), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 752 , 112 L.Ed.2d 772 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mathis v. Velsicol Chemical Corp.
See United States v. Fleet Factors Corp., 901 F.2d 1550, 1553-54 (11th Cir.1990), cert. denied, — U.S.-, *974 111 S.Ct. 752 , 112 L.Ed.2d 772 (1991); Kelley v. Thomas Solvent Co., 790 F.Supp. 710 (W.D.Mich.1990); United States v. Parsons, 723 F.Supp. 757, 760 (N.D.Ga.1989) (Murphy, J.).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Easyriders Freedom F.I.G.H.T. v. Hannigan
Where a law at issue “does not implicate First Amendment rights, it may be challenged for vagueness only as applied,” id., unless the enactment is “impermissibly vague in all of its applica tions.” Schwartzmiller v. Gardner, 752 F.2d 1341, 1348 (9th Cir.1984) (quoting Village of Hoffman Estates v. The Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc., 455 U.S. 489, 495, 102 S.Ct. 1186, 1191 , 71 L.Ed.2d 362 (1982)); see also United States v. Doremus, 888 F.2d 630, 634 (9th Cir.1989) (statute facially vague if it specifies “no standard of conduct at all”), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1046 , 111 S.Ct. 752 …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
ca9 1996
Where a law at issue "does not implicate First Amendment rights, it may be challenged for vagueness only as applied," id., unless the enactment is "impermissibly vague in all of its applications." Schwartzmiller v. Gardner, 752 F.2d 1341, 1348 (9th Cir.1984) (quoting Village of Hoffman Estates v. The Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc., 455 U.S. 489, 495 , 102 S.Ct. 1186, 1191 , 71 L.Ed.2d 362 (1982)); see also United States v. Doremus, 888 F.2d 630, 634 (9th Cir.1989) (statute facially vague if it specifies "no standard of conduct at all"), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1046 , 111 S.Ct. 752 , 112 L.Ed.2…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
City of Toledo v. Beazer Materials & Services, Inc.
See also, United States v. Fleet Factors Corp., 901 F.2d 1550 , 1554 n. 3 (11th Cir.1990) (“Although the ‘owner and operator’ language of § 9607(a)(1) is in the conjunctive, we construe this language in the disjunctive in accordance with the legislative history of CERCLA and the persuasive interpretations of other federal courts.”), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1046 [ 111 S.Ct. 752 , 112 L.Ed.2d 772 ] (1991); ...
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
E S Robbins Corp. v. Eastman Chemical Co.
See, e.g., United States v. Fleet Factors Corp., 901 F.2d 1550, 1554 (11th Cir.1990) (holding that § 9607(a)(1) imposes strict liability), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1046 , 111 S.Ct. 752 , 112 L.Ed.2d 772 (1991); Chatham Steel Corp. v. Brown, 858 F.Supp. 1130, 1138-39 (N.D.Fla.1994) (holding that § 9607(a)(3) does not include intent requirement).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Reichhold Chemicals, Inc. v. Textron, Inc.
See, e.g., United States v. Fleet Factors Corp., 901 F.2d 1550, 1554 (11th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1046 , 111 S.Ct. 752 , 112 L.Ed.2d 772 (1991); In re Bell Petroleum Services, Inc., 3 F.3d 889, 897 (5th Cir.1993); New York v. Shore Realty Corp., 759 F.2d 1032, 1044 (2nd Cir.1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Chatham Steel Corp. v. Brown
See, e.g., United States v. Fleet Factors Corp., 901 F.2d 1550, 1554 (11th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1046 , 111 S.Ct. 752 , 112 L.Ed.2d 772 (1991); In re Bell Petroleum Services, Inc., 3 F.3d 889, 897 (5th Cir.1993); Dedham Water Co., *1139 889 F.2d at 1150 (1st Cir.); United States v. Aceto Agricultural Chems.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Wedzeb Enterprises, Inc.
See, e.g., U.S. v. Fleet Factors Corp., 901 F.2d 1550 , 1554 n. 3 (11th Cir.1990), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 111 S.Ct. 752 , 112 L.Ed.2d 772 (1991); United States v. Maryland Bank & Trust Co., 632 F.Supp. 573, 577-78 (D.Md.1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 13,294 Willis A. White, Linda White v. David Edmond, Irene Edmond, Vnac
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Fleet Factors Corp., 901 F.2d 1550, 1553 (11th Cir.1990), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 111 S.Ct. 752 , 112 L.Ed.2d 772 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Polmar Realty, Inc.
See, e.g., United States v. Fleet Factors Corp., 901 F.2d 1550 (11th Cir.1990), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 752 , 112 L.Ed.2d 772 (1991): “[A] secured creditor will be liable if its involvement with the management of the facility is sufficiently broad to support the inference that it could affect hazardous waste disposal decisions if it so chose.” Fleet Factors, 901 F.2d at 1558 .
FLEET FACTORS CORP.
v.
UNITED STATES
v.
UNITED STATES
No. 90-504.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 14, 1991.
111 S. Ct. 752
Published
Citer courts: S.D. Georgia (1)
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
Denied.