Sanders v. United States, 503 U.S. 908 (1992).

discussed Cited "but see" State v. Schmidt

Wash. Ct. App. · 2000 · signal: but see · confidence high

See also Stanphill, 134 Wash.2d at 170 , 949 P.2d 365 ("the application of determinate sentencing to a pre-SRA offender" is "substantive" where it "alters the sentencing scheme"). [13] Weaver, 450 U.S. at 29 , 101 S.Ct. 960 ; Aho, 137 Wash.2d at 742 , 975 P.2d 512 ; Stanphill, 134 Wash.2d at 170 , 949 P.2d 365 ; Addleman, 107 Wash.2d at 506 , 730 P.2d 1327 ; Forster, 99 Wash.App. at 180 , 991 P.2d at 695 ; Randle, 47 Wash.App. at 240 , 734 P.2d 51 ; see also Calder, 3 U.S. (3 Dall.) at 390-92 . [14] Collins, 497 U.S. at 41 , 110 S.Ct. 2715 ("constitutional prohibition on ex post facto laws app…

discussed Cited "but see" State v. Schmidt

Wash. Ct. App. · 2000 · signal: but see · confidence high

App. at 181 ; State v. Tully, 198 Wash. 605, 607 , 89 P.2d 517 (1939); State v. Le Pitre, 54 Wash. 166, 168 , 103 P. 27 (1909); but see United States v. Davis, 936 F.2d 352, 356 (8th Cir. 1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 908 (1992).

discussed Cited "but see" Forster v. Pierce County

Wash. Ct. App. · 2000 · signal: but see · confidence high

App. 726, 732 , 887 P.2d 492 (1995). 30 Id. at 732 ; accord, State v. Tully, 198 Wash. 605, 607 , 89 P.2d 517 (1939); State v. Le Pitre, 54 Wash. 166, 168 , 103 P. 27 (1909); Huss, 7 F.3d 1444 ; Cases v. United States, 131 F.2d 916, 921 (1st Cir. 1942), cert. denied, *182 319 U.S. 770 (1943); but see United States v. Davis, 936 F.2d 352, 356 (8th Cir. 1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 908 (1992). 31 United States v. Karnes, 437 F.2d 284, 289-90 (9th Cir.) (firearms statute not ex post facto where Congress merely restricted future activities), cert. denied, 402 U.S. 1008 (1971); United States v. Su…

cited Cited "but see" United States v. Larry Caldwell

6th Cir. · 1999 · signal: but see · confidence high

But see United States v. Rigsby, 943 F.2d 631, 640 (6th Cir.1991) (criticizing this conclusion but following court precedent), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 908 , 112 S.Ct. 1269 , 117 L.Ed.2d 496 (1992).

discussed Cited "see" Hollins v. PREMIER FORD LINCOLN MERCURY, INC.

N.D. Miss. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high

See Guthrie v. Tifco Indus., 941 F.2d 374, 379 (5th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 908 , 112 S.Ct. 1267 , 117 L.Ed.2d 495 (1992) (statements made one year before demotion held too vague *751 and remote in time to establish discrimination); Tillman v. S. Wood Preserving of Hattiesburg, Inc., 377 Fed.Appx. 346, 349 (5th Cir.2010) (affirming district court’s dismissal of all claims based on events occurring more than 180 days prior to filing of EEOC charge); but see Hindman v. Transkrit Corp., 145 F.3d 986 , 993 n. 26 (8th Cir.1998) (three-year-old statements, even if not themselves actionab…

discussed Cited "see" Reynolds v. State

Ala. Crim. App. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high

See Henderson v. State, 583 So.2d 276, 287 (AIa.Crim.App.1990), aff'd, Ex parte Henderson, 583 So.2d 305 (Ala.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 908 , 112 S.Ct. 1268 , 117 L.Ed.2d 496 (1992)(finding no plain error in the prosecutor’s mentioning at the guilt phase “the importance of the case to the victim’s family, the suffering of the family, [and] that he represented the family....”).

discussed Cited "see" Johnson v. State

Ala. Crim. App. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high

See Henderson v. State, 583 So.2d 276, 287 (Ala.Cr.App.1990), affirmed, 583 So.2d 305 (Ala.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 908 , 112 S.Ct. 1268 , 117 L.Ed.2d 496 (1992). “ ‘The emotional manifestations present rise nowhere near the level presented in Collum v. State, 21 Ala.App. 220, 221 , 107 So. 35, 35-36 (1926) (new trial required where in a prosecution for seduction, the prosecutrix fainted in the witness chair, and mother came to her aid weeping and crying, “Nobody knows how much we have suffered over this trouble.

discussed Cited "see" Smith v. State

Ala. Crim. App. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high

See Henderson v. State, 583 So.2d 276 (Ala.Cr.App.1990), aff'd, 583 So.2d 305 (Ala.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 908 , 112 S.Ct. 1268 , 117 L.Ed.2d 496 (1992)." Taylor v. State, 808 So.2d 1148, 1200 (Ala. Crim.App.2000).

cited Cited "see" Doherty v. Center for Assisted Reproduction, P.A.

N.D. Tex. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high

See Guthrie v. Tifco Indus., 941 F.2d 374, 376 (5th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 908 , 112 S.Ct. 1267 , 117 L.Ed.2d 495 (1992).

discussed Cited "see" Taylor v. State (2×) also: Cited "see, e.g."

Ala. Crim. App. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high

See Henderson v. State, 583 So.2d 276 (Ala.Cr.App.1990), aff'd, 583 So.2d 305 (Ala.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 908 , 112 S.Ct. 1268 , 117 L.Ed.2d 496 (1992).

discussed Cited "see" Frazier v. State

Ala. Crim. App. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high

See Henderson v. State, 583 So.2d 276 , 287 (Ala.Cr.App. 1990), affirmed, 583 So.2d 305 (Ala. 1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 908 , 112 S.Ct. 1268 , 117 L.Ed.2d 496 (1992). "`The emotional manifestations present rise nowhere near the level presented in Collum v. State, 21 Ala. App. 220 , 221 , 107 So. 35 , 35-36 (1926) (new trial required where in a prosecution for seduction, the prosecutrix fainted in the witness chair, and mother came to her aid weeping and crying, "Nobody knows how much we have suffered over this trouble.

discussed Cited "see" Pressley v. State

Ala. Crim. App. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high

See Henderson v. State, 583 So.2d 276 , 287 (Ala.Cr.App. 1990), aff'd 583 So.2d 305 (Ala. 1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 908 , 112 S.Ct. 1268 , 117 L.Ed.2d 496 (1992). "`The emotional manifestations present rise nowhere near the level presented in Collum v. State, 21 Ala. App. 220 , 221 , 107 So. 35 , 35-36 (1926) (new trial required where in a prosecution for seduction, the prosecutrix fainted in the witness chair, and mother came to her aid weeping and crying, "Nobody knows how much we have suffered over this trouble.

discussed Cited "see" Dunaway v. State

Ala. Crim. App. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high

See Henderson v. State , 583 So.2d 276 , 304 (Ala.Cr.App. 1990), aff'd, 583 So.2d 305 (Ala. 1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 908 , 112 S.Ct. 1268 , 117 L.Ed.2d 496 (1992); Ex parte Kyzer , 399 So.2d 330 (Ala. 1981).

cited Cited "see" United States v. Alberto Calderon

11th Cir. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high

See United States v. Stowell, 947 F.2d 1251 (5th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 908 , 112 S.Ct. 1269 , 117 L.Ed.2d 497 .

cited Cited "see" United States v. Calderon

11th Cir. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high

See United States v. Stowell, 947 F.2d 1251 (5th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 908 , 112 S.Ct. 1269 , 117 L.Ed.2d 497 .

discussed Cited "see" State v. Timoteo (2×)

Haw. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high

See. e.g., United States v. Arky, 938 F.2d 579 (5th Cir.1991) (failing to raise), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 908 , 112 S.Ct. 1268 , 117 L.Ed.2d 496 (1992); United States v. DeTar, 832 F.2d 1110 (9th Cir.1987) (requesting an included offense instruction); United States v. Karlin, 785 F.2d 90 (3d Cir.1986) (failing to raise), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 907 , 107 S.Ct. 1351 , 94 L.Ed.2d 522 (1987); United States v. Williams, 684 F.2d 296 (4th Cir.1982) (requesting an included offense instruction), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1110 , 103 S.Ct. 739 , 74 L.Ed.2d 961 (1983); People v. Speller, 46 Ill.App.3d 208 , …

discussed Cited "see" Smith v. State (2×)

Ala. Crim. App. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high

See Henderson v. State , 583 So.2d 276 (Ala.Cr.App. 1990), aff'd, 583 So.2d 305 (Ala. 1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 908 , 112 S.Ct. 1268 , 117 L.Ed.2d 496 (1992).

cited Cited "see" Rose Marie RAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TANDEM COMPUTERS, INC., Defendant-Appellee

5th Cir. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high

See Guthrie v. Tifco Industries, 941 F.2d 374 (5th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 908 , 112 S.Ct. 1267 , 117 L.Ed.2d 495 (1992).

discussed Cited "see" Weaver v. State (2×) also: Cited "see, e.g."

Ala. Crim. App. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high

See Henderson v. State , 583 So.2d 276 , 287 (Ala.Cr.App. 1990), affirmed, 583 So.2d 305 (Ala. 1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 908 , 112 S.Ct. 1268 , 117 L.Ed.2d 496 (1992). " 'The emotional manifestations present rise nowhere near the level presented in Collum v. State , 21 Ala. App. 220 , 221 , 107 So. 35 , 35-36 (1926) (new trial required where in a prosecution for seduction, the prosecutrix fainted in the witness chair, and mother came to her aid weeping and crying, "Nobody knows how much we have suffered over this trouble.

cited Cited "see" Bell v. Specialty Packaging Products

W.D. Tex. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high

See Guthrie v. Tifco Industries, 941 F.2d 374 (5th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 908 , 112 S.Ct. 1267 , 117 L.Ed.2d 495 (1992); Robertson v. Bell Helicopter Textron, 32 F.3d 948 (5th Cir.1994).

examined Cited "see" DeBruce v. State (4×) also: Cited "see, e.g."

Ala. Crim. App. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high

See Henderson v. State , 583 So.2d 276 , 287 (Ala.Cr.App. 1990), affirmed, 583 So.2d 305 (Ala. 1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 908 , 112 S.Ct. 1268 , 117 L.Ed.2d 496 (1992).

discussed Cited "see" McNair v. State (2×)

Ala. Crim. App. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high

See Henderson v. State , 583 So.2d 276 , 287 (Ala.Cr.App. 1990), affirmed, 583 So.2d 305 (Ala. 1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 908 , 112 S.Ct. 1268 , 117 L.Ed.2d 496 (1992).

discussed Cited "see, e.g." Moody v. Thomas

N.D. Ala. · 2015 · signal: see also · confidence low

See also Henderson v. State, 583 So.2d 276, 304 (Ala.Crim.App.1990), aff'd, 583 So.2d 305 (Ala.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 908 , 112 S.Ct. 1268 , 117 L.Ed.2d 496 (1992). ‘In judging a prosecutor’s closing argument, the standard is whether the argument “so infected the trial with unfairness as to make the resulting conviction a denial of due process.” ’ Bankhead, 585 So.2d at 107, quoting Darden v. Wainwight, 477 U.S. 168, 181 , 106 S.Ct. 2464, 2471 , 91 L.Ed.2d 144 (1986) (quoting Donnelly v. DeChristoforo, 416 U.S. 637 , 94 S.Ct. 1868 , 40 L.Ed.2d 431 (1974)). ‘A prosecutor’s …

discussed Cited "see, e.g." Johnson v. State

Ala. Crim. App. · 2014 · signal: see also · confidence low

See also Henderson v. State , 583 So.2d 276 , 304 (Ala.Crim.App.1990), aff'd, 583 So.2d 305 (Ala.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 908 , 112 S.Ct. 1268 , 117 L.Ed.2d 496 (1992). 'In judging a prosecutor's closing argument, the standard is whether the argument "so infected the trial with unfairness as to make the resulting conviction a denial of due process." ' Bankhead , 585 So.2d at 107 , quoting Darden v. Wainwright , 477 U.S. 168 , 181, 106 S.Ct. 2464 , 2471, 91 L.Ed.2d 144 (1986) (quoting Donnelly v. DeChristoforo , 416 U.S. 637 , 94 S.Ct. 1868 , 40 L.Ed.2d 431 (1974) ). 'A prosecutor's statem…

discussed Cited "see, e.g." Riley v. State

Ala. Crim. App. · 2013 · signal: see also · confidence low

See also Henderson v. State, 583 So.2d 276, 283 (Ala.Cr.App.1990), affirmed, 583 So.2d 305 (Ala.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 908 , 112 S.Ct. 1268 , 117 L.Ed.2d 496 (1992).” Taylor v. State, 666 So.2d 36, 66 (Ala.Crim.App.1994).

discussed Cited "see, e.g." Mashburn v. State

Ala. Crim. App. · 2013 · signal: see also · confidence low

See also Henderson v. State, 583 So.2d 276, 304 (Ala.Crim.App.1990), aff’d, 583 So.2d 305 (Ala.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 908 , 112 S.Ct. 1268 , 117 L.Ed.2d 496 (1992). ‘In judging a prosecutor’s closing argument, the standard is whether the argument “so infected the trial with unfairness as to make the resulting conviction a denial of due process.” ’ Bankhead, 585 So.2d at 107, quoting Darden v. Wainwright, 477 U.S. 168, 181 , 106 S.Ct. 2464, 2471 , 91 L.Ed.2d 144 (1986) (quoting Donnelly v. DeChristoforo, 416 U.S. 637 , 94 S.Ct. 1868 , 40 L.Ed.2d 431 (1974)). ‘A prosecutor�…

discussed Cited "see, e.g." Petric v. State

Ala. Crim. App. · 2013 · signal: see also · confidence low

See also Henderson v. State, 583 So.2d 276, 304 (Ala.Crim.App.1990), aff'd, 583 So.2d 305 (Ala.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 908 , 112 S.Ct. 1268 , 117 L.Ed.2d 496 (1992). ‘In judging a prosecutor’s closing argument, the standard is whether the argument “so infected the trial with unfairness as to make the resulting conviction a denial of due process.” ’ Bankhead, 585 So.2d at 107, quoting Darden v. Wainwright, 477 U.S. 168, 181 , 106 S.Ct. 2464, 2471 , 91 L.Ed.2d 144 (1986) (quoting Donnelly v. DeChristoforo, 416 U.S. 637 , 94 S.Ct. 1868 , 40 L.Ed.2d 431 (1974)). ‘A prosecutor’s…

discussed Cited "see, e.g." Lam Luong v. State

Ala. Crim. App. · 2013 · signal: see also · confidence low

See also Henderson v. State, 583 So.2d 276, 283 (Ala.Cr.App.1990), affirmed, 583 So.2d 305 (Ala.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 908 , 112 S.Ct. 1268 , 117 L.Ed.2d 496 (1992).” Taylor v. State, 666 So.2d 36, 66 (Ala.Crim.App.1994).

discussed Cited "see, e.g." Moody v. State

Ala. Crim. App. · 2011 · signal: see also · confidence low

See also Henderson v. State, 583 So.2d 276, 304 (Ala.Crim.App.1990), affd, 583 So.2d 305 (Ala.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 908 , 112 S.Ct. 1268 , 117 L.Ed.2d 496 (1992). ‘In judging a prosecutor’s closing argument, the standard is whether the argument “so infected the trial with unfairness as to make the resulting con viction a denial of due process.” ’ Bank-head, 585 So.2d at 107, quoting Darden v. Waimoright, All U.S. 168, 181, 106 S.Ct. 2464, 2471 , 91 L.Ed.2d 144 (1986) (quoting Donnelly v. DeChristoforo, 416 U.S. 637 , 94 S.Ct. 1868 , 40 L.Ed.2d 431 (1974)). ‘A prosecutor’s…

cited Cited "see, e.g." Demetrius Avery Jackson, Jr. v. State of Alabama.

Ala. Crim. App. · 2010 · signal: see also · confidence low

See also Henderson v. State, 583 So.2d 276, 304 (Ala.Crim.App.1990), aff’d, 583 So.2d 305 (Ala.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 908 , 112 S.Ct. 1268 , 117 L.Ed.2d 496 (1992).

cited Cited "see, e.g." Phillips v. State

Ala. Crim. App. · 2010 · signal: see also · confidence low

See also Henderson v. State, 588 So.2d 305 (Ala.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 908 , 112 S.Ct. 1268 , 117 L.Ed.2d 496 (1992).

cited Cited "see, e.g." Saunders v. State

Ala. Crim. App. · 2007 · signal: see also · confidence low

See also Henderson v. State, 583 So.2d 276, 304 (Ala.Crim.App.1990), aff'd, 583 So.2d 305 (Ala.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 908 (1992).

discussed Cited "see, e.g." Brooks v. State

Ala. Crim. App. · 2007 · signal: see also · confidence low

See also Henderson v. State, 583 So.2d 276, 304 (Ala.Crim.App.1990), aff'd, 583 So.2d 305 (Ala.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 908 , 112 S.Ct. 1268 , 117 L.Ed.2d 496 (1992). `In judging a prosecutor's closing argument, the standard is whether the argument "so infected the trial with unfairness as to make the resulting conviction a denial of due process."` Bankhead, 585 So.2d at 107, quoting Darden v. Wainwright, 477 U.S. 168, 181 , 106 S.Ct. 2464, 2471 , 91 L.Ed.2d 144 (1986) (quoting Donnelly v. DeChristoforo, 416 U.S. 637 , 94 S.Ct. 1868 , 40 L.Ed.2d 431 (1974)). `A prosecutor's statement must…

discussed Cited "see, e.g." Robitaille v. State

Ala. Crim. App. · 2005 · signal: see also · confidence low

See also Henderson v. State , 583 So.2d 305 (Ala. 1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 908 , 112 S.Ct. 1268 , 117 L.Ed.2d 496 (1992). `In judging a prosecutor's closing argument, the standard is whether the argument "so infected the trial with unfairness as to make the resulting conviction a denial of due process."' Bankhead , 585 So.2d at 107 , quoting Darden v. Wainwright , 477 U.S. 168 , 181 , 106 S.Ct. 2464 , 2471 , 91 L.Ed.2d 144 (1986) (quoting Donnelly v. DeChristoforo , 416 U.S. 637 , 94 S.Ct. 1868 , 40 L.Ed.2d 431 (1974)). `A prosecutor's statement must be viewed in the context of all of the…

discussed Cited "see, e.g." McGowan v. State

Ala. Crim. App. · 2005 · signal: see also · confidence low

See also Henderson v. State, 583 So.2d 276, 283 (Ala.Cr.App.1990), affirmed, 583 So.2d 305 (Ala.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 908 , 112 S.Ct. 1268 , 117 L.Ed.2d 496 (1992).'" Ferguson v. State, 814 So.2d 925 , 937-38 (Ala.Crim.App.2000) (quoting Taylor v. State, 666 So.2d 36, 66 (Ala.Crim.App. 1994), aff'd, 666 So.2d 73 (Ala.1995)), aff'd 814 So.2d 970 (Ala.2001).

discussed Cited "see, e.g." Minor v. State

Ala. Crim. App. · 2004 · signal: see also · confidence low

See also Henderson v. State, 583 So.2d 276, 304 (Ala.Crim.App.1990), aff'd, 583 So.2d 305 (Ala.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 908 , 112 S.Ct. 1268 , 117 L.Ed.2d 496 (1992). `In judging a prosecutor's closing argument, the standard is whether the argument "so infected the trial with unfairness as to make the resulting conviction a denial of due process."' Bankhead, 585 So.2d at 107, quoting Darden v. Wainwright, 477 U.S. 168, 181 , 106 S.Ct. 2464, 2471 , 91 L.Ed.2d 144 (1986) (quoting Donnelly v. DeChristoforo, 416 U.S. 637 , 94 S.Ct. 1868 , 40 L.Ed.2d 431 (1974)). `A prosecutor's statement must…

cited Cited "see, e.g." Deardorff v. State

Ala. Crim. App. · 2004 · signal: see also · confidence low

See also Henderson v. State, 583 So.2d 276, 304 (Ala.Crim.App.1990), aff'd, 583 So.2d 305 (Ala.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 908 , 112 S.Ct. 1268 , 117 L.Ed.2d 496 (1992).

discussed Cited "see, e.g." Wilson v. State

Ala. Crim. App. · 2003 · signal: see also · confidence low

See also Henderson v. State , 583 So.2d 305 (Ala. 1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 908 , 112 S.Ct. 1268 , 117 L.Ed.2d 496 (1992). `In judging a prosecutor's closing argument, the standard is whether the argument "so infected the trial with unfairness as to make the resulting conviction a denial of due process." Bankhead , 585 So.2d at 107, quoting Darden v. Wainwright , 477 U.S. 168 , 181 , 106 S.Ct. 2464 , 2471 , 91 L.Ed.2d 144 (1986) (quoting Donnelly v. DeChristoforo , 416 U.S. 637 , 94 S.Ct. 1868 , 40 L.Ed.2d 431 (1974)). `A prosecutor's statement must be viewed in the context of all of the e…

discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Martin, Unpublished Decision (7-31-2003)

Ohio Ct. App. · 2003 · signal: see also · confidence low

See, also, United States v. Rigsby (C.A. 6, 1991), 943 F.2d 631 , 637 , certiorari denied (1992), 503 U.S. 908 , 112 S.Ct. 1269 ; United States v. Akrawi (1990), (C.A. 6, 1990), 920 F.2d 418 . {¶ 12} In Buie , supra, the Supreme Court did not determine whether the "protective sweep" in that case met the test articulated by the Court, but remanded the case for a determination by the Maryland state court.

cited Cited "see, e.g." Clark v. State

Ala. Crim. App. · 2003 · signal: see also · confidence low

See also Henderson v. State, 583 So.2d 276, 304 (Ala.Crim.App.1990), aff'd, 583 So.2d 305 (Ala.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 908 , 112 S.Ct. 1268 , 117 L.Ed.2d 496 (1992).

discussed Cited "see, e.g." Lewis v. State

Ala. Crim. App. · 2003 · signal: see also · confidence low

See also Henderson v. State, 583 So.2d 276, 304 (Ala.Crim.App.1990), aff'd, 583 So.2d 305 (Ala.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 908 , 112 S.Ct. 1268 , 117 L.Ed.2d 496 (1992). `In judging a prosecutor's closing argument, the standard is whether the argument "so infected the trial with unfairness as to make the resulting conviction a denial of due process."' Bankhead, 585 So.2d at 107, quoting Darden *653 v. Wainwright, 477 U.S. 168, 181 , 106 S.Ct. 2464, 2471 , 91 L.Ed.2d 144 (1986) (quoting Donnelly v. DeChristoforo, 416 U.S. 637 , 94 S.Ct. 1868 , 40 L.Ed.2d 431 (1974)). `A prosecutor's statement…

cited Cited "see, e.g." McNabb v. State

Ala. Crim. App. · 2003 · signal: see also · confidence low

See also Henderson v. State, 583 So.2d 305 (Ala.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 908 , 112 S.Ct. 1268 , 117 L.Ed.2d 496 (1992).

discussed Cited "see, e.g." Stallworth v. State

Ala. Crim. App. · 2003 · signal: see also · confidence low

See also Henderson v. State, 583 So.2d 276, 283 (Ala.Cr.App.1990), affirmed, 583 So.2d 305 (Ala.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 908 , 112 S.Ct. 1268 , 117 L.Ed.2d 496 (1992).'" Quoting Taylor v. State, 666 So.2d 36, 66 (Ala.Crim.App.1994), aff'd, 666 So.2d 73 (Ala.1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1120 , 116 S.Ct. 928 , 133 L.Ed.2d 856 (1996).

discussed Cited "see, e.g." Johnson v. State

Ala. Crim. App. · 2001 · signal: see also · confidence low

See also Henderson v. State, 583 So.2d 276, 304 (Ala.Crim.App.1990), aff'd, 583 So.2d 305 (Ala.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 908 , 112 S.Ct. 1268 , 117 L.Ed.2d 496 (1992). `In judging a prosecutor's closing argument, the standard is whether the argument "so infected the trial with unfairness as to make the resulting conviction a denial of due process."` Bankhead, 585 So.2d at 107, quoting Darden v. Wainwright, 477 U.S. 168, 181 , 106 S.Ct. 2464, 2471 , 91 L.Ed.2d 144 (1986) (quoting Donnelly v. DeChristoforo, 416 U.S. 637 , 94 S.Ct. 1868 , 40 L.Ed.2d 431 (1974)). `A prosecutor's statement must…

cited Cited "see, e.g." Reeves v. State