green
Positive treatment
6.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1999
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Johnson, Eugene
See United States v. McClinton, 135 F.3d 1178, 1193 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 524 U.S. 921 and 525 U.S. 885 (1998).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Eugene Johnson, Also Known as Geno
See United States v. McClinton, 135 F.3d 1178, 1193 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 524 U.S. 921 , 118 S.Ct. 2308 , 141 L.Ed.2d 167 and 525 U.S. 885 , 119 S.Ct. 197 , 142 L.Ed.2d 161 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Cashman, Donald V.
See United States v. McClinton, 135 F.3d 1178, 1993 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 524 U.S. 921 , 118 S. Ct. 2308 , and cert. denied, 525 U.S. 885 , 119 S. Ct. 197 (1998); United States v. Wetwattana, 94 F.3d 280, 284 (7th Cir. 1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Donald v. Cashman, and Scott D. Fedderly
See United States v. McClinton, 135 F.3d 1178, 1193 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 524 U.S. 921 , 118 S.Ct. 2308 , 141 L.Ed.2d 167 , and cert. denied, 525 U.S. 885 , 119 S.Ct. 197 , 142 L.Ed.2d 161 (1998); United States v. Wetwattana, 94 F.3d 280, 284 (7th Cir.1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Chandra D. Sharma, United States of America v. Subodh C. Sharma, United States of America v. Sushil C. Sharma, United States of America v. Vinod C. Vasisth
See United States v. Nolan, 136 F.3d 265, 273 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 118 S. Ct. 2307 (1998); United States v. Gilberg, 75 F.3d 15, 19 (1st Cir. 1996); United States v. Allender, 62 F.3d 909, 917 (7th Cir. 1995); United States v. Henderson, 19 F.3d 917, 928-29 (5th Cir. 1994); United States v. Lowder, 5 F.3d 467, 471 (10th Cir. 1993); cf. United States v. Allen, 88 F.3d 765, 771 (9th Cir. 1996) (implying interest can be included in calculation of loss).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Sharma
See United States v. Nolan, 136 F.3d 265, 273 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 2307 , 141 L.Ed.2d 165 (1998); United States v. Gilberg, 75 F.3d 15, 19 (1st Cir.1996); United States v. Allender, 62 F.3d 909, 917 (7th Cir.1995); United States v. Henderson, 19 F.3d 917, 928-29 (5th Cir.1994); United States v. Lowder, 5 F.3d 467, 471 (10th Cir.1993); cf. United States v. Allen, 88 F.3d 765, 771 (9th Cir.1996) (implying interest can be included in calculation of loss).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Mett
See Andreen, 628 F.2d at 1242 ( 29 U.S.C. § 501 (c) and 18 U.S.C. § 664 use similar language and should be given similar inter pretations); accord United States v. Nolan, 136 F.3d 265, 269 (2d Cir.) (same), cert. denied, — U.S. --, 118 S.Ct. 2307 , 141 L.Ed.2d 165 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lnc Investments, Inc. v. First Fidelity Bank
See United States v. Nolan, 136 F.3d 265, 271 (2d Cir.) ("[M]atter[s] of statutory interpretation and legal definition [are] properly decided by the court, which is the 'final author[ity] on issues of statutory construction.' ") (quoting Federal Election Com'n v. Democratic Senatorial Campaign Comm., 454 U.S. 27, 32 , 102 S.Ct. 38 , 70 L.Ed.2d 23 (1981)) (last alteration in original), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 118 S.Ct. 2307 , 141 L.Ed.2d 165 (1998). 14 Because the superpriority instruction required the jury to decide this legal question in order to resolve the causation issue, it failed "a…
discussed
Cited "see"
LNC Investments, Inc. v. First Fidelity Bank, N.A. New Jersey
See United States v. Nolan, 136 F.3d 265, 271 (2d Cir.) (“[M]atter[s] of statutory interpretation and legal definition [are] properly decided by the court, which is the ‘final authority] on issues of statutory construction.’ ”) (quoting Federal Election Com’n v. Democratic Senatorial Campaign Comm., 454 U.S. 27, 32 , 102 S.Ct. 38 , 70 L.Ed.2d 23 (1981)) (last alteration in original), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 2307 , 141 L.Ed.2d 165 (1998). 14 Because the superpriority instruction required the jury to decide this legal question in order to resolve the causation issue, it fai…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Dora Garcia Cisneros
See, e.g., United States v. Thompson, 130 F.3d 676 , (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 524 U.S. 920 , 118 S.Ct. 2307 , 141 L.Ed.2d 166 (1998)(using beyond reasonable doubt standard).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Cisneros
See, e.g., United States v. Thompson, 130 F.3d 676 , (5th Cir.1997), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 2307 , 141 L.Ed.2d 166 (1998) (using beyond reasonable doubt standard); United States v. Thompson, 130 F.3d 676, 688 (5th Cir.1997)(same).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Branch
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 97-8989.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 8, 1998.
Published
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.