green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
9.6 score
“prison officials who actually knew of a substantial risk to inmate health or safety may be found free from liability if they responded reasonably to the risk, even if the harm ultimately was not averted.”
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 23 distinct citers.
examined
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
Birkley v. Joseph
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
prison officials who actually knew of a substantial risk to inmate health or safety may be found free from liability if they responded reasonably to the risk, even if the harm ultimately was not averted.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Montiel 321211 v. Johnson
Farmer described that civil standard as follows: “[t]he civil law generally calls a person reckless who acts or (if the person has a duty to act) fails to act in the face of an unjustifiably high risk of harm that is either known or so obvious that it should be known.” Farmer, 522 U.S. at 836; see also Howell v. NaphCare, Inc., 67 F.4th 302 , 311 (6th Cir. 2023) (explaining that “[a]pplying Kingsley’s reasoning, Brawner held that a pretrial detainee must make a showing . . . that each defendant acted deliberately [and] also recklessly in the face of an unjustifiably high risk of harm t…
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Lyons v. Barry County Jail
Farmer described that civil standard as follows: “[t]he civil law generally calls a person reckless who acts or (if the person has a duty to act) fails to act in the face of an unjustifiably high risk of harm that is either known or so obvious that it should be known.” Farmer, 522 U.S. at 836; see also Howell v. NaphCare, Inc., 67 F.4th 302 , 311 (6th Cir. 2023) (explaining that “[a]pplying Kingsley’s reasoning, Brawner held that a pretrial detainee must make a showing . . . that each defendant acted deliberately [and] also recklessly in the face of an unjustifiably high risk of harm t…
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Estelle v. Schmidt
Farmer described that civil standard as follows: “[t]he civil law generally calls a person reckless who acts or (if the person has a duty to act) fails to act in the face of an unjustifiably high risk of harm that is either known or so obvious that it should be known.” Farmer, 522 U.S. at 836; see also Howell v. NaphCare, Inc., 67 F.4th 302 , 311 (6th Cir. 2023) (explaining that “[a]pplying Kingsley’s reasoning, Brawner held that a pretrial detainee must make a showing . . . that each defendant acted deliberately [and] also recklessly in the face of an unjustifiably high risk of harm t…
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Bonham v. Family Outreach Center Inc.
Farmer described that civil standard as follows: “[t]he civil law generally calls a person reckless who acts or (if the person has a duty to act) fails to act in the face of an unjustifiably high risk of harm that is either known or so obvious that it should be known.” Farmer, 522 U.S. at 836; see also Howell v. NaphCare, Inc., 67 F.4th 302 , 311 (6th Cir. 2023) (explaining that “[a]pplying Kingsley’s reasoning, Brawner held that a pretrial detainee must make a showing . . . that each defendant acted deliberately [and] also recklessly in the face of an unjustifiably high risk of harm t…
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Wilson-Angeles
See State v. Geddie , 345 N.C. 73 , 95, 478 S.E.2d 146 , 157 (1996), cert. denied , 522 U.S. 825 , 118 S.Ct. 86 , 139 L.Ed.2d 43 (1997) (concluding that "[e]vidence tending to show only that defendant drank some unknown quantity of alcohol over an indefinite period of time before the [crime] does not satisfy the defendant's burden of production" necessitating a voluntary intoxication instruction).
discussed
Cited "see"
Raymond Charles White v. State
See Janecka v. State, 937 S.W.2d 456, 466 (Tex.Crim.App.1996), cer t. denied, 522 U.S. 825 , 118 S.Ct. 86 , 139 L.Ed.2d 43 (1997); see also Herrera v. State, 194 S.W.3d 656, 660 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2006, pet. ref d) (holding officer’s statement that he would “talk to the District Attorney and would get an offer” was not specific enough to influence an untruthful confession).
discussed
Cited "see"
Williams v. State
(2×)
See Janecka v. State, 937 S.W.2d 456, 468 (Tex.Crim.App.1996), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 825 , 118 S.Ct. 86 , 139 L.Ed.2d 43 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
Opinion No.
See Pondexter v. State , 942 S.W.2d 577 , 580 (Tex.Crim.App. 1996), cert. denied , 522 U.S. 825 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Canales v. State
See Janecka v. State, 937 S.W.2d 456, 468 (Tex.Cr.App.1996), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 825 , 118 S.Ct. 86 , 139 L.Ed.2d 43 (1997) (defendant’s assertion on appeal that “he was unable to adequately prepare his defense” did not establish specific prejudice from trial court’s failure to grant his motion for continuance).
cited
Cited "see"
Turner v. State
See Pondexter v. State, 942 S.W.2d 577, 586 (Tex.Cr.App.1996), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 825 , 118 S.Ct. 85 , 139 L.Ed.2d 42 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
Bordman v. State
See Janecka v. State, 937 S.W.2d 456, 466 (Tex.Crim.App.1996), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 825 , 118 S.Ct. 86 , 139 L.Ed.2d 43 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
Hai Hung Dang v. State
See Pondexter v. State , 942 S.W.2d 577, 584 (Tex.Crim.App.1996), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 825 , 118 S.Ct. 85 , 139 L.Ed.2d 421 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Alphonso Soto Chafino v. State
See Janeka v. State, 937 S.W.2d 456 (Tex.Cr.App. 1996), cert. denied , 522 U.S. 825 , 118 S.Ct. 86 , 139 L.Ed.2d 43 (1997), citing Franklin v. State, 693 S.W.2d 420, 431 (Tex.Cr.App. 1985), cert. denied , 475 U.S. 1031 , 106 S.Ct. 1238 , 89 L.Ed.2d 346 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Smith v. State
(2×)
See Pondexter v. State, 942 S.W.2d 577, 583-584 (Tex.Crim.App.1996), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 825 , 118 S.Ct. 85 , 139 L.Ed.2d 42 (1997) (same transaction contextual evidence is admissible only “when the offense would make little or no sense without also bringing in the same transaction evidence”).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Garcell
See, e.g., State v. Geddie, 345 N.C. 73, 101 , 478 S.E.2d 146, 160 (1996), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 825 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bell v. State
Fuller v. State, 829 S.W.2d 191, 202 (Tex.Crim.App.1992), ce rt. denied, 508 U.S. 941 , 113 S.Ct. 2418 , 124 L.Ed.2d 640 (1993); see also Janecka v. State, 739 S.W.2d 813, 830 (Tex.Crim.App.1987) (holding that defendant has no standing to complain of an illegal search of another’s residence), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 825 , 118 S.Ct. 86 , 139 L.Ed.2d 43 (1997); McArthur v. State, 1 S.W.3d 323, 329 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 1999, pet. ref'd) (holding that defendant has no standing to complain of the seizure of phone records that belong to defendant’s employer), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 873 , 121 S.Ct…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ross v. State
See id. (defendant must show actual prejudice from denial of motion for continuance); see also Janecka v. State, 937 S.W.2d 456, 468 (Tex.Cr.App.1996), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 825 , 118 S.Ct. 86 , 139 L.Ed.2d 43 (1997) (defendant must show actual prejudice from the denial of a motion for continuance).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bell v. State
See Morra v. State, 742 So.2d 815, 816 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999) (holding that evidence showing that defendant charged with sexual activity with child had been violent toward victim and victim’s mother relevant to show why victim had not reported sexual abuse earlier); Smith v. State, 538 So.2d 66, 67 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989) (affirming trial court’s decision to allow child victim to testify about father’s physical abuse of mother and fear of father as being relevant to show why victim did not report her sexual abuse); see also Hartley v. State, 686 So.2d 1316, 1321 (Fla.1996) (holding that prosecu…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Barnes v. State
Harmelin v. Michigan, 501 U.S. 957, 994-95 , 111 S.Ct. 2680, 2701 , 115 L.Ed.2d 836 (1991); Prater, 903 S.W.2d at 60 ; see also Pondexter v. State, 942 S.W.2d 577, 587 (Tex.Crim.App.1996), cer t. denied, 522 U.S. 825 , 118 S.Ct. 85 , 139 L.Ed.2d 42 (1997).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Cummings
Thomas, 350 N.C. at 361 , 514 S.E.2d at 514 ; see also State v. Geddie, 345 N.C. 73, 100 , 478 S.E.2d 146, 160 (1996), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 825 , 139 L.
Walker
v.
Texas
v.
Texas
No. 96-8548.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 6, 1997.
Published
Ct. Crim. App. Tex. Certiorari denied.