green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
9.4 score
“defendant suggests, without citing a basis in the record, that the issue may have been raised 'off the record.' this court, however, will not look outside the record to find objections.”
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Owen v. City of Portland
under the oregon constitution, circuit courts have subject matter jurisdiction over all actions unless a statute or rule of law divests them of jurisdiction.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Sugiyama v. Arnold
defendant suggests, without citing a basis in the record, that the issue may have been raised 'off the record.' this court, however, will not look outside the record to find objections.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Davis
article i, section 12, of the oregon constitution, requires police questioning to cease only when a defendant is in custody, i.e., not free to leave.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Bittle
See State v. Terry, 333 Or 163, 180 , 37 P3d 157 (2001), cert den, 536 US 910 (2002) (Plain error exists when (1) the error is an error of law; (2) the point is obvious, i.e., not reasonably in dispute; and (3) and the court is not required to go outside the record or select among competing inferences.).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Sparks
See State v. Terry, 333 Or 163 , 182-83 n 12, 37 P3d 157 (2001), cert den, 536 US 910 (2002) (question set out in ORS 163.150(l)(b)(C) not submitted to jury).
cited
Cited "see"
McCoy v. State
See Farina v. State, 801 So.2d 44, 54 (Fla.2001), cert. denied, 536 U.S. 910 , 122 S.Ct. 2369 , 153 L.Ed.2d 189 (2002); Bell v. State, 699 So.2d 674, 677 (Fla.1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Castille v. Compliance Solutions Occupational Trainers, Inc.
See Castille v. Compliance Solutions, 29 Fed.Appx. 559 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 536 U.S. 910 , 122 S.Ct. 2370 , 153 L.Ed.2d 190 , pet. for reh’g denied, 536 U.S. 983 , 123 S.Ct. 21 , 153 L.Ed.2d 884 (2002). 2 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Sayles
Ed. 2d 772 (1984); see also State v. Mordowanec, 259 Conn. 94, 107 , 788 A.2d 48 , cert. denied, 536 U.S. 910 , 122 S. Ct. 2369 , 153 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Sayles
Ed. 2d 772 (1984); see also State v. Mordowanec, 259 Conn. 94, 107 , 788 A.2d 48 , cert. denied, 536 U.S. 910 , 122 S. Ct. 2369 , 153 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Veatch
(2×)
The Bowen court, citing State v. Smith, 310 Or 1, 26 , 791 P2d 836 (1990), affirmed the denial of the defendant’s motion for a mistrial, reasoning that “jurors are assumed to have followed their instructions, absent an overwhelming probability that they would be unable to do so.” 340 Or at 511 ; see also State v. Terry, 333 Or 163, 177 , 37 P3d 157 (2001), cert den, 536 US 910 (2002) (a curative instruction was sufficient to “neutralize the possibility of prejudice” of evidentiary inference that the defendant failed a polygraph examination).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Dunlap
Id. at 142-43 ; see also State v. Terry, 333 Or 163, 171 , 37 P3d 157 (2001), cert den, 536 US 910 (2002).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Acremant
See, e.g., State v. Terry, 333 Or 163 , 182-83 n 12, 37 P3d 157 (2001), cert den, 536 US 910 (2002) (question set out in ORS 163.150(1)(b)(C) not submitted to jury).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Fanus
See, e.g., State v. Terry, 333 Or 163 , 182-83 n 12, 37 P3d 157 (2001), cert den, 536 US 910 (2002) (question set out in ORS 163.150(1)(b)(C) not submitted to jury).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Walczyk
See, e.g., State v. Mordowanec, 259 Conn. 94, 109-10 , 788 A.2d 48 (search warrant), cert. denied, 536 U.S. 910 , 122 S. Ct. 2369 , 153 L.
Reneau
v.
Cockrell, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division
v.
Cockrell, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division
01-9612.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 10, 2002.
Published
Citer courts: Oregon Supreme Court (2) · Court of Appeals of Oregon (1)
RENEAU
v.
COCKRELL, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION.
No. 01-9612.
Supreme Court of the United States.
June 10, 2002.
1
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 31 Fed. Appx. 151.