Beasley v. United States, 534 U.S. 1052 (2001). · Go Syfert
Search
Beasley v. United States, 534 U.S. 1052 (2001). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
48 citation events (48 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Peterson (connappct, 2014-10-07)
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002 2014 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Peterson
Conn. App. Ct. · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Revelo, 256 Conn. 494, 503 , 775 A.2d 260 (‘‘in the absence of a showing of good cause, an appellate court should decline to review an issue that has not been raised in accordance with the provisions of § 54-94a [and] . . . such good cause is likely to be established only infrequently’’), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1052 , 122 S. Ct. 639 , 151 L.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Elson (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Revelo, 256 Conn. 494, 502-504 , 775 A.2d 260 , cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1052 , 122 S. Ct. 639 , 151 L.
cited Cited "see" State v. Munoz
Conn. App. Ct. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Revelo, 256 Conn. 494 , 502 n.16, 775 A.2d 260 , cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1052 , 122 S. Ct. 639 , 151 L.
cited Cited "see" State v. McGinnis
Conn. App. Ct. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Revelo, 256 Conn. 494 , 502 n.16, 775 A.2d 260 , cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1052 , 122 S. Ct. 639 , 151 L.
cited Cited "see" State v. D'Antonio
Conn. App. Ct. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Revelo, 256 Conn. 494, 505-506 , 775 A.2d 260 , cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1052 , 122 S. Ct. 639 , 151 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Sinchak
Conn. App. Ct. · 2021 · signal: see also · confidence low
Principles of due process, however, forbid a court from retaliating against a defen- dant by increasing his sentence merely because of the exercise of such a right.’’ (Citations omitted.) Id., ; see also State v. Revelo, 256 Conn. 494, 513 , 775 A.2d 260 (‘‘[a]lthough a court may deny leniency to an accused who . . . elects to exercise a statutory or con- stitutional right, a court may not penalize an accused for exercising such a right by increasing his or her sentence solely because of that election’’), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1052 , 122 S. Ct. 639 , 151 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Fuller
Conn. App. Ct. · 2015 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare State v. Revelo, 256 Conn. 494 , 502–504, 775 A.2d 260 (after concluding that ‘‘case presents one of the rare exceptions to the general rule of unreviewability’’ court exercises supervisory authority to review waived claim), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1052 , 122 S. Ct. 639 , 151 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Christensen
Conn. App. Ct. · 2015 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Revelo, 256 Conn. 494, 503 , 775 A.2d 260 , cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1052 , 122 S. Ct. 639 , 151 L.
Beasley
v.
United States
No. 01-7002.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 26, 2001.
534 U.S. 1052
Published

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.