Muhammad, AKA Mease v. Close, 539 U.S. 925 (2003). · Go Syfert
Search
Muhammad, AKA Mease v. Close, 539 U.S. 925 (2003). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
23 citation events (23 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Zoeller v. United States (uscfc, 2005-05-12)
Treatment trajectory · 2003 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2003 2014 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
discussed Cited "see" Zoeller v. United States
Fed. Cl. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Castle v. United States, 301 F.3d 1328, 1341-1342 (Fed.Cir.2002), reh’g and reh’g en banc denied, 64 Fed.Appx. 227 (Fed.Cir.2003), cert. denied, 539 U.S. 925 , 123 S.Ct. 2572 , 156 L.Ed.2d 602 (2003).
discussed Cited "see" Abney v. Alameida
S.D. Cal. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See Castle v. United States, 301 F.3d 1328, 1342 (Fed.Cir.2002) (holding that enactment of a regulatory scheme did not constitute an unconstitutional taking because the plaintiffs “retained the full range of remedies associated with any contractual property right they possessed.”), cert. denied, 539 U.S. 925 , 123 S.Ct. 2572 , 156 L.Ed.2d 602 (2003).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Wells Fargo Bank Northwest, N.A. v. Yett (In Re Yett)
9th Cir. BAP · 2004 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also In re Till, 301 F.3d 583 (7th Cir.2002), cert. granted, Till v. SCS Credit Corp., 539 U.S. 925 , 123 S.Ct. 2572 , 156 L.Ed.2d 601 (Mem.) (2003) (No. 02-1016) (Chapter 11, 12, and 13 cramdown provisions analogous; collecting cases on determination of cram-down rates).
Muhammad, AKA Mease
v.
Close
02-9065.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 16, 2003.
539 U.S. 925
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

C. A. 6th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed informa pauperis granted, and certiorari granted limited to the following questions: “1. Whether a plaintiff who wishes to bring a § 1983 suit challenging only the conditions, rather than the fact or duration, of his confinement, must satisfy the favorable termination requirement of Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U. S. 477 (1994). 2. Whether a prison inmate who has been, but is no longer, in administrative segregation may bring, a § 1983 suit challenging the conditions of his confinement (i. e., his prior placement in administrative segregation) without first satisfying the favorable termination requirement of Heck v. Humphrey.” Corinne Beckwith, Esq., of Washington, D. C., is appointed to serve as counsel for petitioner in this case.